为什么函数用括号括起来? [英] Why is the function with in parenthesis?
问题描述
问题:
为什么函数包含在括号中?我已经从括号中取出了这个代码,它没有任何问题。
Why is the function wrapped in a parenthesis? I have taken this code out of parenthesis and it works with no trouble.
将代码放入(function(){...这里的代码...})();喜欢它在以下示例中?
What is the benefit of having the code in a (function() { ...Code Here...})(); like it is in the following example?
代码:
(function() {
"use strict";
// Doesn't work because strict mode
// enforces the fact that the second example shouldn't work
if (true) {
function fn1() {
// This won't run
console.log("doesn't work -- have a great Die Hard Day XIII");
};
fn1();
}
})();
代码这里:将JQuery字作为参数发送给这个命名空间的是什么。我知道函数包含在(...)中的原因是创建一个命名空间。我想一个更好的问题是为什么一个人会传入一个变量,但我想这将是另一个命名空间需要变量的情况。
Code Here: What would sending the JQuery word as a parameter do for this namespace. I know that the reason that the function is enclosed in (...) is to create a namespace. I guess a better question would be as to why one would pass in a variable, but I would imagine that would be in case another namespace needed the variable.
( function( $ ) {
// Init Skrollr
var s = skrollr.init({
render: function(data) {
//Debugging - Log the current scroll position.
//console.log(data.curTop);
}
});
} )( jQuery );
推荐答案
我采取了这个括号内的代码,没有问题。
I have taken this code out of parenthesis and it works with no trouble.
这不正确;它本身无法运行(甚至无法解析)。 JavaScript在函数声明所在的位置看到函数
并假设它是函数声明。括号用于强制上下文成为表达式。如果它明确地是一个函数文字 - 例如,在变量声明中 - 但许多人发现它更具可读性,那么这种做法是多余的。例如,有一个 jsHint选项来强制执行。
That’s not correct; it can’t run (or even be parsed) by itself. JavaScript sees function
in a place where a function declaration can be and assumes it’s a function declaration. Parentheses are used to force the context to be an expression. The practice is redundant if it’s unambiguously a function literal – say, in a variable declaration – but many find it more readable. There’s a jsHint option to enforce it, for example.
这篇关于为什么函数用括号括起来?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!