提升过程和C. [英] Boost process and C
问题描述
是否有任何以C ++ Boost小组的方式工作的组，这对于C语言的演变是什么？或者是否有任何组执行
等效功能？
谢谢，
-vs
ex *** ***********@gmail.com 写道：是否有任何以C ++ Boost小组的方式工作的小组
进化C语言？或者是否有任何组执行
等效功能？
我对C ++ Boost组一无所知，但其余的<没有这些信息，问题似乎很清楚。
ISO委员会，JTC1 / SC22 / WG14，控制C语言标准。
其网页是< http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/> ;.
讨论C标准（与讨论不同）由C标准定义的
语言）通常在
comp.std.c中进行。 （与任何新闻组一样，我建议在发布之前浏览档案
和/或潜伏一段时间。）
-
Keith Thompson（The_Other_Keith） ks***@mib.org < http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> ;
圣地亚哥超级计算机中心< *> < http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
我们必须做点什么。这是事情。因此，我们必须这样做。
ex**************@gmail.com écrit：
是否有任何组C ++ Boost小组的工作方式是否适用于C语言的演变？或者是否有任何组执行
等效功能？
谢谢，
-vs
我想要这样的一个团体存在但是...我从来没有找到过一个。
很可惜。例如，在这个论坛中的大多数人，我认为这将是一个群体，拒绝讨论任何进化论，并且似乎怀念某些神话般的过去：他们支持C89
标准（17年前完整）并且如果提出任何改进，将开始变得非常不安
。他们中的大多数人都认为，就像其中一个人说的那样：
C ++是未来，我们只是在等待C程序员消亡。
这当然排除任何讨论演变的态度
的语言
jacob
jacob naviaaécrit：他们中的大多数人认为，其中一个人说：
" C ++是未来，我们只是在等待C程序员消亡。
参考文献是:(那个人说的）
83
De：E。Robert Tisdale
日期：2005年3月15日18:29
电子邮件：E。 Robert Tisdale < E.Robert.Tisd ... @ jpl.nasa.gov>
Groupes：comp.lang.c，comp.sources.d
Masood写道：我知道这个话题可能会激怒C语言Taleban
但是有没有什么前景可以将C ++的一些简洁功能整合到C中？
不，我是没有说出OO的东西。
我说的是非OO的东西，与C相比，似乎在C ++中处理起来更优雅。
例如，consts，声明使用前的变量，
已经被C99采用。
new&删除，引用等。
表示构造函数和析构函数（OO的东西）。
我问这个问题是既得利益。
我我真的很想在我的C程序中使用这些功能。
只需使用这些C ++功能就可以使C更好了
并使用一个C ++编译器。
这意味着你应该注意确保你编写的每个C程序都是一个有效的C ++程序
。
C存在的唯一原因是：b
使得C程序员可以维护遗留代码。
C程序员不希望C进化或成长。
他们对C99中引入的新功能不感兴趣
并且编译器开发人员还没有完全实现它们[还]
所以我不认为在添加你提到的C ++功能时会有很多兴趣
。
我很惊讶有人可以这样的事情没有
有任何人会反驳他，我于2004年11月1日开始了一个新线程
来讨论......
Hi,
Is there any group in the manner of the C++ Boost group that works on
the evolution of the C language? Or is there any group that performs an
equivalent function?
Thanks,
-vs
ex**************@gmail.com writes:Is there any group in the manner of the C++ Boost group that works on
the evolution of the C language? Or is there any group that performs an
equivalent function?
I don''t know anything about the C++ Boost group, but the rest of your
question seems clear enough without that information.
The ISO committee, JTC1/SC22/WG14, controls the C language standard.
Its web page is <http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/>.
Discussion of the C standard (as distinct from discussion of the
language defined by the C standard) generally takes place in
comp.std.c. (As with any newsgroup, I recommend browsing the archives
and/or lurking for a while before posting.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
ex**************@gmail.com a écrit :Hi,
Is there any group in the manner of the C++ Boost group that works on
the evolution of the C language? Or is there any group that performs an
equivalent function?
Thanks,
-vs
I would like that such a group existed but... I have never found one.
It is a pity. Most people in this forum, for instance, that I thought
it would be suchg a group, refuse to discuss about any evolution
and seem nostalgic of some mythical past: they endorse the C89
standard (full 17 years ago) and will start getting VERY upset
if any improvement is proposed. Most of them think, as one of them
said:
"C++ is the future, we are just waiting that C programmers die out."
This precludes of course any attitude that would discuss the evolution
of the language
jacob
jacob navia a écrit :Most of them think, as one of them
said:
"C++ is the future, we are just waiting that C programmers die out."
The reference is: (the guy that said that)
83
De : E. Robert Tisdale
Date : Mar 15 fév 2005 18:29
E-mail : "E. Robert Tisdale" <E.Robert.Tisd...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Groupes : comp.lang.c, comp.sources.d
Masood wrote: I know that this topic may inflame the "C language Taleban"
but is there any prospect
of some of the neat features of C++ getting incorporated in C?
No I am not talking out the OO stuff.
I am talking about the non-OO stuff
that seems to be handled much more elegantly in C++, as compared to C.
For example, consts, declaring variables just before use,
Already adopted by C99.
new & delete, references, etc.
Implies constructors and destructors (OO stuff).
I am asking this question with a vested interest.
I would really like to use these features in my C programs.
You can make C better by simply using these C++ features
and compiling with a C++ compiler.
This means that you should take care to ensure that
every C program that you write is also a valid C++ program.
The only reason that C exists
is so that C programmers can maintain legacy codes.
C programmers don''t want C to evolve or grow.
They aren''t enthusiastic about the new features introduced in C99
and compiler developers haven''t fully implemented them [yet]
so I don''t think that there will be much interest
in adding the C++ features that you have mentioned.
I was quite surprised that somebody can say something like that without
having anyone that would contradict him, that I started a new thread
the 1 Nov 2004 to discuss that...
这篇关于提升过程和C.的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
