Verdana字体。为什么不？ [英] Verdana font. Why not?

问题描述

我对此有点好奇。


与我合作的平面设计人员说这是他们首选的字体

网页。原因在于它是更友善的。无论是形状还是大小，都可以看到

。


HTMLhardcore elititst我认为它是一种无用的字体，因为它比其他字体要大得多。


我个人并不关心这种或那种方式，但我一般信任

图形设计师比程序员和规则律师更多的是纯粹的设计
。


在我看来反对使用Verdana的唯一论据是，大量的浏览器不支持它，因此它会导致他们的

页面使用非常小的字体进行渲染。


任何人都可以诚实地说他们没有安装Verdana字体吗？

I am a bit curious about this.

The graphic design people I work with say it is their preferred font for
web pages. The reason being that it is "kinder" to the eye both in terms
of shape and size.

The HTML "hardcore elititst" profess that it is a useless font because
it is too big compared to other fonts.

Personally I do not care one way or the other, but I generally trust
graphic designers more than programmers and rules lawyers when it comes
to pure design.

It seems to me that the only argument against using Verdana is that a
large number of browsers do not support it and therefore it causes their
pages to render with a very small font.

Can anyone honestly say they do not have the Verdana font installed?

推荐答案

曾几何时* St？ le S？b？e *写道：

Once upon a time *St?le S?b?e* wrote:

我对此有点好奇。

我工作的图形设计人员说这是他们首选的字体
网页。原因在于它是更友善的。从形状和大小的角度来看，

HTML硬核精英我认为它是一种无用的字体，因为它与其他字体相比太大了。

我个人并不关心这种或那种方式，但我一般都相信
平面设计师对于纯粹的设计来说，不仅仅是程序员和规则律师。

在我看来，反对使用Verdana的唯一理由就是大量的浏览器不支持因此它会导致他们的页面以非常小的字体呈现。

任何人都可以诚实地说他们没有安装Verdana字体吗？

I am a bit curious about this.

The graphic design people I work with say it is their preferred font for
web pages. The reason being that it is "kinder" to the eye both in terms
of shape and size.

The HTML "hardcore elititst" profess that it is a useless font because
it is too big compared to other fonts.

Personally I do not care one way or the other, but I generally trust
graphic designers more than programmers and rules lawyers when it comes
to pure design.

It seems to me that the only argument against using Verdana is that a
large number of browsers do not support it and therefore it causes their
pages to render with a very small font.

Can anyone honestly say they do not have the Verdana font installed?

我猜大多数Windows系统也有Verdana，关于其他系统

（比如Mac和Linux）我不确定。你不应该使用像素（或

点）作为字体大小，并留给用户看看

首选（默认）大小的字体。在sutch的情况下，我猜它可能会使用Verdana，即使它不是首选字体。


-

/ Arne


Mozilla Suite的骄傲用户。在此获取免费副本：

*英语* http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/

* Svenska * http://www.mozilla.se/mozilla.shtml

St？le S？b？ e< ot ***** @ tdz.no>写道：

St?le S?b?e <ot*****@tdz.no> wrote:

我对此有点好奇。

我工作的图形设计人员说这是他们网页的首选字体。原因在于它是更友善的。从形状和大小的角度来看。


他们建议使用的尺寸是多少？如果Verdana在浏览器上

默认大小是它们之后的样子那么就去吧。


如果他们建议它用于更小的字体然后他们

实际上同意...

HTMLhardcore elititst他们认为这是一种无用的字体，因为它与其他字体相比太大了。


使用Verdana，设置一个使Verdana看起来正确的字体大小。现在

从你的系统中删除Verdana（或者只是在你的

样式表中注释掉它）。使用你的后备字体文本是否仍然正确？

我个人并不关心这种或那种方式，但我普遍相信图形设计师比程序员和规则律师更多<纯粹的设计。


啊但是你相信可访问性和可用性方面的问题？

在我看来，反对使用Verdana的唯一论据是
大量浏览器不支持它，因此它会使用非常小的字体呈现它们的页面。


不是大数，只是一个数字。

任何人都可以诚实地说他们没有安装Verdana字体吗？

I am a bit curious about this.

The graphic design people I work with say it is their preferred font for
web pages. The reason being that it is "kinder" to the eye both in terms
of shape and size.
What size are they suggesting it be used at? If Verdana at the browser
default size is the look they are after then go for it.

If they''re suggesting that it be used at a smaller font size then they
are in fact agreeing with...
The HTML "hardcore elititst" profess that it is a useless font because
it is too big compared to other fonts.
Use Verdana, set a font-size that makes Verdana look right to you. Now
delete Verdana from your system (or just comment it out in your
stylesheet). Does the text still look right with your fallback font?
Personally I do not care one way or the other, but I generally trust
graphic designers more than programmers and rules lawyers when it comes
to pure design.
Ah but who do you trust on matters of accessibility and usability?
It seems to me that the only argument against using Verdana is that a
large number of browsers do not support it and therefore it causes their
pages to render with a very small font.
Not "a large number", just "a number".
Can anyone honestly say they do not have the Verdana font installed?

根据 http： //www.visibone.com/font/FontResults.html 98％的

用户安装了Verdana。


Steve


-

我的理论给你起见，我的异端邪说你，

我从不回信，你不喜欢我的领带"。 - 医生


Steve Pugh< st *** @ pugh.net> < http://steve.pugh.net/>

According to http://www.visibone.com/font/FontResults.html 98% of
users have Verdana installed.

Steve

--
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you,
I never answer letters and you don''t like my tie." - The Doctor

Steve Pugh <st***@pugh.net> <http://steve.pugh.net/>

2005年3月17日星期四10:02:34 +0100，St？le S？b？ e< ot ***** @ tdz.no>

写道：

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:02:34 +0100, St?le S?b?e <ot*****@tdz.no>
wrote:

我对此有点好奇。

HTML硬核精英他们认为这是一种无用的字体，因为它与其他字体相比太大了。


Verdana是屏幕优化的字体，而Arial是打印优化的

字体。所以我觉得Verdana是个不错的选择。


Verdana，Helvetica，sans-serif;将是我的chioce for font-family。


[...]支持它，因此它会导致他们的页面以非常小的字体呈现。

I am a bit curious about this.

The graphic design people I work with say it is their preferred font for
web pages. The reason being that it is "kinder" to the eye both in terms
of shape and size.

The HTML "hardcore elititst" profess that it is a useless font because
it is too big compared to other fonts.
Verdana is a screen-optimized font while Arial is a print-optimized
font. So I think Verdana is a good choice.

Verdana, Helvetica ,sans-serif; would be my chioce for font-family.

[...] support it and therefore it causes theirpages to render with a very small font.

使用em或px

不要使用pt


Curt

Use em or px
don''t use pt

Curt

这篇关于Verdana字体。为什么不？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！