LH中的哪个版本？ [英] Which version in LH for?
问题描述
我有一个网页，它使用无序列表（< UL>）和LH（列表
标头）标记。我知道LH是一个有效的标签，因为它在W3C中明确定义为
： http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/bulletlists.html
问题是，当我尝试验证页面时W3C，它告诉我：
"元素LH undefined"
我的页面是4.01 Transitional，使用charset windows-1252。
任何想法为什么不能验证？
I have a web page that uses an unordered list (<UL>) and the LH (list
header) tag. I know LH is a valid tag because it is clearly defined by
the W3C here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/bulletlists.html
The problem is, when I try to validate the page at W3C, it tells me:
" element "LH" undefined "
My page is 4.01 Transitional, using charset windows-1252.
Any ideas why this won''t validate?
推荐答案
" Jane Withnolastname" < JA ********************** @ yahoo.com>在消息中写道
news：rf ******************************** @ 4ax.com ...
"Jane Withnolastname" <Ja**********************@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rf********************************@4ax.com...
我有一个网页，它使用无序列表（< UL>）和LH（列表
标题）标记。我知道LH是一个有效的标签，因为它在W3C中有明确的定义： http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/bulletlists.html
问题是，当我尝试在W3C验证页面时，它告诉我：
元素LH undefined"
我的页面是4.01 Transitional，使用charset windows-1252。
任何想法为什么这不会验证？
I have a web page that uses an unordered list (<UL>) and the LH (list
header) tag. I know LH is a valid tag because it is clearly defined by
the W3C here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/bulletlists.html
The problem is, when I try to validate the page at W3C, it tells me:
" element "LH" undefined "
My page is 4.01 Transitional, using charset windows-1252.
Any ideas why this won''t validate?
你''正在尝试验证HTML 4.01
http ：//www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html
然而你引用的东西是3.0规范的一部分，甚至从未去过< br $> b $ b公众。
-
Karl Core
Charles Sweeney说我的签名很好。
You''re trying to validate for HTML 4.01
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html
Yet you cite something that is part of a 3.0 spec that never even went
public.
--
Karl Core
Charles Sweeney says my sig is fine as it is.
2003年8月6日星期三22:13:45 -0400，EightNineThree
< ei ************@REMOVEeightninethree.com>写道：
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:13:45 -0400, "EightNineThree"
<ei************@REMOVEeightninethree.com> wrote:
您正在尝试验证HTML 4.01
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html
然而你引用了一些东西是3.0规范的一部分，甚至从未公开过。
You''re trying to validate for HTML 4.01
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html
Yet you cite something that is part of a 3.0 spec that never even went
public.
好吧，看，这就是我想知道的。我不知道它是不是
结转到更新的版本，而且W3C网站上没有任何我能找到
告诉我的。这就是我问的原因。谢谢。
Well, see, that''s all I wanted to know. I had no idea it was not
carried forward to newer versions, and there was nothing I could find
on the W3C site to tell me that. That''s why I asked. Thanks.
Jane Withnolastname写道：
Jane Withnolastname wrote:
2003年8月6日星期三22:13:45 -0400，EightNineThree ;
< ei ************ @ REMOVEeightninethree.com>写道：
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:13:45 -0400, "EightNineThree"
<ei************@REMOVEeightninethree.com> wrote:
您正在尝试验证HTML 4.01
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html
然而你引用了一些东西是3.0规范的一部分，甚至从未公开过。
You''re trying to validate for HTML 4.01
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html
Yet you cite something that is part of a 3.0 spec that never even went
public.
好吧，看，这就是我想知道的。我不知道它没有被推向更新的版本，而且在W3C网站上我找不到任何东西告诉我。这就是我问的原因。谢谢。
Well, see, that''s all I wanted to know. I had no idea it was not
carried forward to newer versions, and there was nothing I could find
on the W3C site to tell me that. That''s why I asked. Thanks.
当然有！
< URL：http：//www.w3.org/TR/ html401 />
甚至
< URL：http：//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32> （仅供历史使用）
-
Shawn K. Quinn
Sure there was!
<URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/>
or even
<URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32> (for historical use only)
--
Shawn K. Quinn
这篇关于LH中的哪个版本？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
