VB.NET或C＃.NET ??? [英] VB.NET or C#.NET ???
问题描述
你好，
我想问你这个问题。我在VBA编程
方面经验丰富，我现在想把我的知识升级到Visual Studio 2005。我想b / b
犹豫是否要瞄准VB或C＃。由于我熟悉VBA，我想b / b
想选择VB，但是我的同事们心里觉得VB是一个很好的bb。语言，它可能不会包含在Visual Studio的下一个
版本中。他们对VB的另一个反对意见是，实际上VB并不是面向对象的语言，并且它没有像C＃那样在OOP中提供这样的可能性。另一方面，他们
欣赏VB语法的简易性。
我必须补充说我想用VB或C＃作为前端来大的
数据库放在SQL服务器上。
感谢您的意见！
米兰
Hello,
I would like to ask you this question. I am experienced in programming
in VBA and I want to upgrade my knowledge to Visual Studio 2005 now. I
hesitate whether to aim to VB or C#. Since I am familiar with VBA I
would like to choose VB but I heart from my colleagues that VB is a
"dead" language and it will probably not be included in the next
versions of Visual Studio anymore. Their other objection against VB is
that VB is not object-oriented language in fact and that it does not
offer such possibilities in OOP as C# does. On the other hand they
appreciate an ease of VB syntax.
I have to add that I would like to use VB or C# as front-ends to large
DBs placed on SQL server.
Thank you for your opinions!
Milan
推荐答案
>>我的同事们，我认为VB是一个死的人。语言，它将
>> I heart from my colleagues that VB is a "dead" language and it will
可能不再包含在Visual Studio的下一个版本中。
完全错误！ VB.NET和C＃一样活着，也是MS的第一类优先级。
他们对VB的另一个反对意见是VB实际上不是面向对象的语言而且它不是<像C＃那样在OOP中提供这样的可能性。
你可以说是经典的VB，但肯定不是VB.NET。 VB.NET是一个完整的OOP语言，它提供了C＃提供的所有可能性，即
尊重。
另一方面，他们感谢VB语法的简易。
probably not be included in the next
versions of Visual Studio anymore.
Totally false! VB.NET is as alive as C# and a first class priority for MS.
Their other objection against VB is that VB is not object-oriented
language in fact and that it does not
offer such possibilities in OOP as C# does.
You could say that of "classic" VB, but certainly not of VB.NET. VB.NET is a
full-fledged OOP language and offers all the possibilities C# offers in that
respect.
On the other hand they appreciate an ease of VB syntax.
熟悉VB语法通常是选择VB.NET而不是C＃的原因。
问候 - Octavio
Familiarity with VB syntax is usually a reason for selecting VB.NET over C#.
Regards - Octavio
Hi Milan
谁是你的朋友？
很难告诉你该做什么，但实际上继续说
听起来很不合理
Shmuel Shulman
"米兰" < MI ************ @ centrum.cz>在消息中写道
news：11 ********************** @ g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com ...
Hi Milan
Who are your friends?
It is difficult to tell you what to do but actually go on and say that
sounds very unreasonable
Shmuel Shulman
"Milan" <mi************@centrum.cz> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
你好，
我想问你这个问题。我在VBA编程方面经验丰富，现在我想将我的知识升级到Visual Studio 2005。我是否犹豫是否瞄准VB或C＃。由于我熟悉VBA，我想选择VB，但我的同事们，我认为VB是死的。语言，它可能不再包含在Visual Studio的下一个版本中。他们对VB的另一个反对意见是VB实际上并不是面向对象的语言，并且它不像C＃那样在OOP中提供这种可能性。另一方面，他们欣赏VB语法的简易性。
我必须补充一点，我想使用VB或C＃作为前端放置到大型的数据库中SQL服务器。
感谢您的意见！
米兰
Hello,
I would like to ask you this question. I am experienced in programming
in VBA and I want to upgrade my knowledge to Visual Studio 2005 now. I
hesitate whether to aim to VB or C#. Since I am familiar with VBA I
would like to choose VB but I heart from my colleagues that VB is a
"dead" language and it will probably not be included in the next
versions of Visual Studio anymore. Their other objection against VB is
that VB is not object-oriented language in fact and that it does not
offer such possibilities in OOP as C# does. On the other hand they
appreciate an ease of VB syntax.
I have to add that I would like to use VB or C# as front-ends to large
DBs placed on SQL server.
Thank you for your opinions!
Milan
" Milan" < MI ************ @ centrum.cz> schrieb：
"Milan" <mi************@centrum.cz> schrieb:
我想问你这个问题。我在VBA编程方面经验丰富，现在我想将我的知识升级到Visual Studio 2005。我是否犹豫是否瞄准VB或C＃。由于我熟悉VBA，我想选择VB，但我的同事们，我认为VB是死的。语言，它可能不再包含在Visual Studio的下一个版本中。他们对VB的另一个反对意见是VB实际上并不是面向对象的语言，并且它不像C＃那样在OOP中提供这种可能性。另一方面，他们欣赏VB语法的简易性。
I would like to ask you this question. I am experienced in programming
in VBA and I want to upgrade my knowledge to Visual Studio 2005 now. I
hesitate whether to aim to VB or C#. Since I am familiar with VBA I
would like to choose VB but I heart from my colleagues that VB is a
"dead" language and it will probably not be included in the next
versions of Visual Studio anymore. Their other objection against VB is
that VB is not object-oriented language in fact and that it does not
offer such possibilities in OOP as C# does. On the other hand they
appreciate an ease of VB syntax.
正如其他人已经说过的那样，没有理由使用C风格的语言
今天还可以完成任务。如果您有VB背景，我建议转向VB.NET并学习读取C＃，这在使用.NET类代码处理
时通常很有用。 VB.NET至少和C＃一样活着。
-
MS Herfried K. Wagner
MVP< URL ：http：//dotnet.mvps.org/>
VB< URL：http：//classicvb.org/petition/>
As others have already said, there is no reason to use a C-style language
today any more to get things done. If you have a VB background, I suggest
to turn to VB.NET and learn to read C#, which is often useful when dealing
with code using .NET classes. VB.NET is at least as alive as C#.
--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>
这篇关于VB.NET或C＃.NET ???的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
