SPEC CPU2006宣布 [英] SPEC CPU2006 announced

问题描述

来自标准性能评估的新CPU基准

公司宣布

http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/

comp.arch和comp.benchmarks的读者可以

回想起几年前我发布了基准候选人的电话

a。感谢那些回复的人。

真实应用程序有很多贡献，

以及各种免费程序，

包含的内容（请参阅上面的URL中的credits.html

）。


新的基准是对编译器的挑战：主要是

新代码，源自实际应用程序，以及超过
300万行代码。然而，各种各样的

编译器已用于产生初步结果。


- John Henning

性能工程师，Sun Microsystems

和

SPEC CPU小组委员会副主席/秘书

解决方案

< blockquote> Jo************@gmail.com 写道：

来自标准性能评估的新CPU基准测试

公司宣布

< snip spam>


你的C问题是？对于那些关于comp.lang.c ++的你的C ++问题？

或你的Fortran问题？看起来像它的主要组，从

名称，* *可能*是主题是comp.benchmarks。

- John Henning

Sun Microsystems性能工程师

和

副主席/秘书，SPEC CPU小组委员会

如果你真的在这些职位上，你应该知道比通过垃圾邮件使你的公司声名狼借更好。

-

Flash Gordon

Flash Gordon< sp ** @ flash-gordon.me.ukwrites：

Jo ************ @ gmail.com 写道：

来自标准性能评估的新CPU基准测试

公司宣布

< ;抓住垃圾邮件>


和您的C问题是？对于那些关于comp.lang.c ++的你的C ++

问题？或者你的Fortran问题？从它的名字来看它看起来好的主要组合，它* *可能*是主题是comp.benchmarks。

- John Henning

Sun Microsystems性能工程师

和

副主席/秘书，SPEC CPU小组委员会

如果你真的在这些职位上，你应该知道比通过垃圾邮件使你的公司声名鹊起更好。

-

Flash Gordon

我不认为这对于C / C ++ / Fortran团队来说不像你那样

似乎暗示。我记得，在评估编译器（和架构）性能时，测试规范套件包括通常使用的最低C（可能还有一些FORTRAN）基准测试。因此，当我在b和C ++编译器上工作时，我很关心那些测试。我很惊讶，comp.compilers并不在交叉发布的

组列表中。


只是我的意见，

-Chris


********************** **************************** ********************** *****

克里斯克拉克互联网： co*****@world.std.com

Compiler Resources，Inc。网站： http ：//world.std.com/~compres

23 Bailey Rd声音：[phone]

柏林，MA 01503美国传真:( 978）838-0263（24小时）

--------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------

在文章< sd ************* @ shell01.TheWorld.com>，

Chris F Clark< cf*@shell01.TheWorld.comwrote：

> Flash Gordon< sp ** @ flash-gordon.me.ukwrites：

> Jo ************ @ gmail.com 写道：

来自标准性能评估的新CPU基准测试
公司宣布为

< snip spam>

不，这不是主题。

>你的C问题是？对于那些关于comp.lang.c ++的你的C ++
问题？或者你的Fortran问题？它看起来像主要的组，从名称，*可能*是主题是comp.benchmarks。

- John Henning

性能工程师，Sun Microsystems

和

副主席/秘书，SPEC CPU小组委员会

如果你真的在这些职位上你应该知道比通过垃圾邮件使你的公司声名狼借更好。

我同意以下内容。另一方面，有些人不会躲在别名后面。

但这是你的选择。

>我不喜欢我们认为这对于C / C ++ / Fortran小组来说并不像你似乎暗示的那样偏离主题。我记得，规范测试套件包括评估编译器（和架构）性能时通常使用的至少C（可能还有一些FORTRAN）基准测试。因此，当我在使用C和C ++编译器时，我关心那些测试。我更惊讶的是，comp.compilers并不在交叉发布的组中。

Levine必须批准它作为主持人。有些人认为适度的b
很慢。我们保护你们免受大量垃圾邮件的攻击。<​​br />

-

The new CPU benchmark from the Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation is announced

http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/

Readers of comp.arch and comp.benchmarks may
recall that I posted a call for benchmark candidates
a few years ago. Thank you to those who responded.
There were many contributions of real applications,
as well as a variety of freely-available programs,
that were included (see "credits.html" at the URL
above).

The new benchmark is a challenge to compilers: mostly
new code, derived from real applications, and over
3 million lines of code. Nevertheless, a wide variety of
compilers have been used to produce initial results.

- John Henning
Performance Engineer, Sun Microsystems
and
Vice-Chair/Secretary, SPEC CPU Subcommittee

解决方案

Jo************@gmail.com wrote:

The new CPU benchmark from the Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation is announced

<snip spam>

and your C question is? Of for those on comp.lang.c++ your C++ question?
Or your Fortran question? The main group where it looks like, from the
name, it *might* be topical is comp.benchmarks.

- John Henning
Performance Engineer, Sun Microsystems
and
Vice-Chair/Secretary, SPEC CPU Subcommittee

If you really are in those positions you should know better than to
bring your companies in to disrepute by spamming.
--
Flash Gordon

Flash Gordon <sp**@flash-gordon.me.ukwrites:

Jo************@gmail.com wrote:

The new CPU benchmark from the Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation is announced

<snip spam>

and your C question is? Of for those on comp.lang.c++ your C++
question? Or your Fortran question? The main group where it looks
like, from the name, it *might* be topical is comp.benchmarks.

- John Henning
Performance Engineer, Sun Microsystems
and
Vice-Chair/Secretary, SPEC CPU Subcommittee

If you really are in those positions you should know better than to
bring your companies in to disrepute by spamming.
--
Flash Gordon

I don''t think it is as off-topic for the C/C++/Fortran groups as you
seem to suggest. As I recall, the spec suite of tests includes at
least C (and perhaps some FORTRAN) benchmarks that are typically used
when evaluating compiler (and architecture) performance. Thus, when I
was working on C and C++ compilers, I cared about those tests. I''m
more surprised, that comp.compilers wasn''t in the list of cross-posted
groups.

Just my opinion,
-Chris

************************************************** ***************************
Chris Clark Internet : co*****@world.std.com
Compiler Resources, Inc. Web Site : http://world.std.com/~compres
23 Bailey Rd voice : [phone]
Berlin, MA 01503 USA fax : [phone] (24 hours)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In article <sd*************@shell01.TheWorld.com>,
Chris F Clark <cf*@shell01.TheWorld.comwrote:

>Flash Gordon <sp**@flash-gordon.me.ukwrites:

>Jo************@gmail.com wrote:

The new CPU benchmark from the Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation is announced

<snip spam>

No it''s not off topic.

>and your C question is? Of for those on comp.lang.c++ your C++
question? Or your Fortran question? The main group where it looks
like, from the name, it *might* be topical is comp.benchmarks.

- John Henning
Performance Engineer, Sun Microsystems
and
Vice-Chair/Secretary, SPEC CPU Subcommittee

If you really are in those positions you should know better than to
bring your companies in to disrepute by spamming.

I agree with below. On the other hand some people don''t hide behind aliases.
But that''s your choice.

>I don''t think it is as off-topic for the C/C++/Fortran groups as you
seem to suggest. As I recall, the spec suite of tests includes at
least C (and perhaps some FORTRAN) benchmarks that are typically used
when evaluating compiler (and architecture) performance. Thus, when I
was working on C and C++ compilers, I cared about those tests. I''m
more surprised, that comp.compilers wasn''t in the list of cross-posted
groups.

Levine has to approve it as moderator. Some people think moderated
are slow. We shield you guys from a lot of spam.

--

这篇关于SPEC CPU2006宣布的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！