自动编码标准验证？ [英] automated coding standard validation?
问题描述
我正在寻找验证符合定义的编码标准的工具。
我已经找到了Parasoft的C ++测试，但它非常昂贵。
有没有开源替代品？我不需要GUI，花哨的报告或
预定义的规则集。
I am looking for tool to validate conformity to defined coding standard.
I have already found Parasoft''s C++ Test, but it is quite expensive. Is
there any Open Source alternative? I do not need GUI, fancy reports nor
predefined sets of rules.
推荐答案
Konrad Palczynski< ka ** **@interia.pl>写道：
Konrad Palczynski <ka****@interia.pl> writes:
我正在寻找验证符合定义编码标准的工具。我已经找到了Parasoft的C ++测试，但它非常昂贵。有没有开源替代品？我不需要GUI，
花哨的报告或预定义的规则集。
I am looking for tool to validate conformity to defined coding
standard. I have already found Parasoft''s C++ Test, but it is quite
expensive. Is there any Open Source alternative? I do not need GUI,
fancy reports nor predefined sets of rules.
只是出于兴趣，如果你没有规则，你将如何定义你的
特定的编码标准？
如果您对C / C ++的静态检查感兴趣，那么请看看
夹板：
http://www.splint.org
免费及其多平台。
" Splint是静态检查C程序以确保安全的工具
漏洞和编码错误。只需很少的努力，Splint就可以用作更好的棉绒。如果投入额外的努力为程序添加
注释，Splint可以执行比任何标准lint更好的检查。
Just out of interest, if you dont have rules, how will you define your
particular coding standards?
If you''re interested in static checking of C/C++ then take a look at
splint at:
http://www.splint.org
Its free and its multi-platform.
"Splint is a tool for statically checking C programs for security
vulnerabilities and coding mistakes. With minimal effort, Splint can be
used as a better lint. If additional effort is invested adding
annotations to programs, Splint can perform stronger checking than can
be done by any standard lint."
2006年6月26日星期一14:13:23 +0200，Konrad Palczynski
< ka **** @ interia.pl>在comp.lang.c中写道：
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:13:23 +0200, Konrad Palczynski
<ka****@interia.pl> wrote in comp.lang.c:
我正在寻找验证符合定义编码标准的工具。
我已经找到了Parasoft的C ++测试，但它很贵。是否有任何开源替代方案？我不需要GUI，花哨的报告或
预定义的规则集。
I am looking for tool to validate conformity to defined coding standard.
I have already found Parasoft''s C++ Test, but it is quite expensive. Is
there any Open Source alternative? I do not need GUI, fancy reports nor
predefined sets of rules.
http://www.gimpel.com
-
Jack Klein
主页： http://JK-Technology.Com
comp.lang.c的常见问题解答 http：// c-faq。 com /
comp.lang.c ++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c ++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/ ~a ... FAQ-acllc.html
http://www.gimpel.com
--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
Richard G. Riley写道：
Richard G. Riley wrote:
Konrad Palczynski< ka ** **@interia.pl>写道：
Konrad Palczynski <ka****@interia.pl> writes:
我正在寻找验证符合定义编码标准的工具。我已经找到了Parasoft的C ++测试，但它非常昂贵。有没有开源替代品？我不需要GUI，
花哨的报告或预定义的规则集。
只是出于兴趣，如果你没有规则，你将如何定义特定的编码标准？
I am looking for tool to validate conformity to defined coding
standard. I have already found Parasoft''s C++ Test, but it is quite
expensive. Is there any Open Source alternative? I do not need GUI,
fancy reports nor predefined sets of rules.
Just out of interest, if you dont have rules, how will you define your
particular coding standards?
对不起。我的意思是我不需要包含一系列规则。我将自己定义
来遵循我的（客户端）编码标准。
如果你对C / C ++的静态检查感兴趣那么看一看在
夹板处：
http：//www.splint。 org
它的免费及其多平台。
Sorry. I meant I do not need sets of rules to be included. I will define
them myself to follow my (client''s) coding standard.
If you''re interested in static checking of C/C++ then take a look at
splint at:
http://www.splint.org
Its free and its multi-platform.
Splint + Indent可能是我的选择。谢谢！
Splint + Indent will probably be my choice. Thanks!
这篇关于自动编码标准验证？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
