批判CSS布局（解决的问题） [英] Critique CSS layout (issues addressed)
问题描述
我已经解决了我上一篇文章的回复中列出的大部分问题
" Critique CSS布局（第一次去 - 手指交叉）"。我对你所取得的进展充满了兴趣
，感谢你过去批评的一切。
http://www.limelightstudio.com.au/iss/8/
解决的问题：
- 导航使用< li>现在
- IE6中没有水平滚动，850-900像素
- 导航区域不固定，流畅现在
- 添加< h＃ >标记替换< div>
- 更改CAPS
- 更深的正文文本
- 更改页脚布局&颜色
- 悬停时导航链接不同
- 歌剧中横幅错位
令人惊奇的是使用正确的< h＃>
标记时，CSS布局更容易....
注意：链接不会去任何地方。字体大小保持不变。
I have addressed most of the issues listed in the responses to my last post
"Critique CSS layout (1st go - fingers crossed)". I''m rapt with the progress
I have made, thanks to all for your past critiques.
http://www.limelightstudio.com.au/iss/8/
The issues addressed:
- Nav uses <li> now
- No horizontal scroll in IE6 at 850-900 pixels
- Nav area not fixed, fluid now
- Added <h#> markup to replace <div>
- Changed CAPS
- Darker body text
- Changed footer layout & colour
- Made nav links different on hover
- Mis-alignment of banner in Opera
It''s amazing how much easier CSS layout is when using the correct <h#>
markup....
Note: Links don''t go anywhere. Font size has remained the same.
推荐答案
lime写道：
lime wrote:
http://www.limelightstudio.com.au/iss/8/
如果我的画布在右边，你为什么要浪费20％左右。肯定
的文字可以贴在我窗户的右边附近吗？
-
干杯
Richard。
Why do you waste about 20% if my canvas, on the right hand side. Surely the
text could wrap near the right hand side of my window?
--
Cheers
Richard.
" rf" < RF @。无效>写道：
"rf" <rf@.invalid> wrote:
lime写道：
lime wrote:
http://www.limelightstudio.com.au/iss/8/
为什么要浪费大约20 ％如果我的画布，在右侧。当然
文本可以包裹在我窗口的右侧附近吗？
Why do you waste about 20% if my canvas, on the right hand side. Surely the
text could wrap near the right hand side of my window?
限制一行的长度并非不合理。根据字体的大小，字体轮廓，行高，
字间距和字体拉伸，有一点线条
太长了以获得良好的可读性。
你找不到用8ex超浓缩字体打印的文字1ex
A4风景线上的
线高度非常易读，不是吗？
石灰选择的线宽是否合理，是否值得讨论
值得商榷。首先，它不依赖于字体
大小。视力不好的人，将字体大小覆盖为更大的字体大小，会发现它很短。
一个更好的方法就是行
http：// www.uni-koeln.de/~agr30/iss/l...om.auiss8.html
（在Opera和Firefox中测试）。您可以放大和缩小而不需要销售布局（ctrl + Num +和Num-在Firefox中）。也许石灰可以
考虑这些行中的某些内容并重新考虑不要触及内容的
fontsize。使用较小的尺寸，比如
页脚是可以的，恕我直言。
我也发现很多网站的字体太小了。感谢上帝，
Opera允许设置一个无法覆盖的最小字体大小
css（我的设置为14px，这也是我配置的100％字体大小） 。
再见，
马丁
Limiting the length of a line is not unreasonable. Depending of the
size of the font, the outline of the font, the line height, the
inter-word spacing and the font-stretch, there is a point when lines
get too long for good readability.
You won''t find a text printed with a 8pt ultra-condensed font with 1ex
line height on A4 landscape very readable, won''t you?
Whether the line width chosen by lime is sensible, is
debatable. First of all, it is not dependant on the font
size. Someone with bad eyesight, who has overridden the font sizes to
something larger, will find it to short.
A better way would be something in the lines of
http://www.uni-koeln.de/~agr30/iss/l...om.auiss8.html
(tested in Opera and Firefox). You can zoom in and out without
destroying to layout (ctrl + Num+ and Num- in Firefox). Maybe lime can
consider something in these lines and reconsider to not touch the
fontsize for the content. Using s smaller size for things like the
page footer is OK, IMHO.
I too find many websites having too small a fontsize. Thanks god,
Opera allows to set a minimum fontsize that can not be overridden by
css (mine is set to 14px, which is also the 100% fontsize I configured).
Bye,
Martin
2004年11月15日星期一12:32:43 GMT，rf< rf @ .invalid>写道：
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:32:43 GMT, rf <rf@.invalid> wrote:
lime写道：
lime wrote:
http://www.limelightstudio.com.au/iss/8/
为什么要浪费大约20 ％如果我的画布，在右侧。当然
文本可以包裹在我窗口的右侧附近吗？
Why do you waste about 20% if my canvas, on the right hand side. Surely
the text could wrap near the right hand side of my window?
轻松阅读？我根本不介意。很大程度上取决于你的窗户尺寸我想b / b
，但全长文字并不总是一件好事...
也许添加：
最小宽度：30em;
规则#mmhidemiddlebox可能不错。
-
Rijk van Geijtenbeek
网络是一种拖延装置：
它可以吸收所需的时间确保你
不会完成任何真正的工作。 - J.Nielsen
Easy reading? I don''t mind at all. Depends a lot on your window size I
suppose, but full length text isn''t always a good thing...
Maybe adding:
min-width: 30em;
to the rules for #mmhidemiddlebox might be nice.
--
Rijk van Geijtenbeek
The Web is a procrastination apparatus:
It can absorb as much time as is required to ensure that you
won''t get any real work done. - J.Nielsen
这篇关于批判CSS布局（解决的问题）的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
