Zope 3.0，为什么我不会使用它 [英] Zope 3.0, and why I won't use it

问题描述

大家好，


所以Zope仍然活着，是的。嗯，我喜欢他们使用Python。


< rant>


让我感到惊讶的是他们写道他们添加了类型变量

并希望它也会被添加到Python项目中。真的。

ROFL。


而不是在引擎上工作，他们应该把更多工作

放到例子中。简单的教程。用于

Windows的可下载可执行文件，您可以单击并安装。但最重要的是简单和

很好的例子：web应用程序如

- zope中的wiki

- zope的论坛，有议程和日历

- 像 http://216.199.69.100/war/ 在zope


他们为zope提供了一个很好的免费虚拟主机，但期待新的用户可以从头开始做任何事情...

示例我发现非常令人失望。


< / rant>

Hello all,

So Zope still lives, yay. Well, I like that they use Python.

<rant>

What amazed me is they write that they "added types to the variables
and hope that it will be added to the Python project too". Really.
ROFL.

And instead of working on the engine they should have put more work
into examples. Simple tutorials. Downloadable executables for
Windows that you can click and install. But most of all simple and
good examples: webapplications like
- a wiki in zope
- a forum in zope, with agenda and calendar
- a game like http://216.199.69.100/war/ in zope

They have a nice free webhosting thing for zope, but to expect new
users to do everything from scratch...
The "examples" I found were very disappointing.

</rant>

推荐答案

> Guido一再表示，Python的未来版本将包括静态类型支持。 Zope项目推动了许多过去对Python的改变。这有什么好玩的？


听起来非常unpythonic :)一个或两个链接到一些网站

更多地解释了什么是静态类型支持意味着Python

会很好。


-

mvh Bj？rn

> Guido has repeatedly stated that a future version of Python will include static type support. The Zope project has driven numerous past changes to Python. What''s funny about this?

It sounds very "unpythonic" :) A link or two to some site that
explains a little more what "static type support" means to Python
would be nice.

--
mvh Bj?rn

Stuyvesant写道：

Will Stuyvesant wrote:

而不是在引擎上工作，他们应该把更多的工作放在例子中。简单的教程。

And instead of working on the engine they should have put more work
into examples. Simple tutorials.

已经发布的不是Zope 3

但是Zope X3其中X代表eXperimental。


我理解它的方式，他们想展示

技术和系统架构。所以不要因为不想要的东西而敲门。


Istvan。


ps 。我说，经过几个小时的愚弄后，我觉得它比以往更加复杂了......而且还不清楚它是什么
我们从支付该价格中获得的
。我们将看到它是如何演变的。

What has been released is not Zope 3
but Zope X3 where the X stands for eXperimental.

The way I understood it they want to showcase the
technology and system architecture. So don''t knock
it for what is not meant to be.

Istvan.

ps. that being said I, after a few hours of fooling
around with it I found it to be more complicated
than ever ... and it was not clear what is it
that we gain from paying that price. We''ll see how it
evolves.

Istvan Albert写道：

Istvan Albert wrote:

Will Stuyvesant写道：

Will Stuyvesant wrote:

而不是在引擎上工作，他们应该把更多的工作放在例子中。简单的教程。

And instead of working on the engine they should have put more work
into examples. Simple tutorials.

已经发布的不是Zope 3
而是Zope X3，其中X代表eXperimental。

我理解它的方式他们想展示
技术和系统架构。所以不要为了不应该的东西而敲门。

Istvan。

ps。经过几个小时的愚弄，我发现它比以往任何时候都要复杂......而且我们从中得到的是什么呢？支付这个价格。我们会看到它是如何演变的。

What has been released is not Zope 3
but Zope X3 where the X stands for eXperimental.

The way I understood it they want to showcase the
technology and system architecture. So don''t knock
it for what is not meant to be.

Istvan.

ps. that being said I, after a few hours of fooling
around with it I found it to be more complicated
than ever ... and it was not clear what is it
that we gain from paying that price. We''ll see how it
evolves.

你设法让它运行？我发现整个装载不透明，超过了

的信念，经过一个小时的检查后将其移除。


问候

史蒂夫

-
http://www.holdenweb.com
http://pydish.holdenweb.com

Holden Web LLC [phone]

You managed to get it to run? I found the whole load opaque beyond
belief, and removed it after an hour''s examination.

regards
Steve
--
http://www.holdenweb.com
http://pydish.holdenweb.com
Holden Web LLC [phone]

这篇关于Zope 3.0，为什么我不会使用它的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！