浏览器和W3C标准辩论 [英] Browser and W3C standards Debate

问题描述

标准代码：

http://validator.w3.org/


And它们应该几乎完全相同（祝福Firefox好运，它有点短）

Code to standards:
http://validator.w3.org/

And they should be almost identical (good luck with firefox, it falls a little short)

虽然这是一个旧线程，但我希望纠正这个关于Firefox的声明，因为它是完全错误的。 Firefox以及Opera是目前地球上最符合标准的浏览器，而所有版本的IE都落后于Web标准九年。它是首席开发人员，克里斯威尔逊，自己为自己的IE缺点道歉并公开承认他们在赶上其他人之前还有很长的路要走。


网络开发人员的咒语是Firefox / Opera代码;调整IE的怪癖和错误。如果您编写Web标准并首先在Firefox或Opera中进行测试，那么您可以相对确信它可以在所有浏览器中使用。仅在IE中进行编码，您可以相对放心，它不会在所有浏览器中工作。

Though this is an old thread, I wish to correct this statement about Firefox as it is totally false. Firefox, along with Opera, are the most standards compliant browsers on the planet right now while IE, all versions, are nine years behind web standards. It''s lead developer, Chris Wilson, stumbles over himself apologizing for IEs shortcomings and publicly acknowledges they have a long road to hoe before catching up with everyone else.

A web developer''s mantra is "Code for Firefox/Opera; adjust for IEs quirks and bugs." If you code to web standards and test in Firefox or Opera first, then you can be relatively assured it will work in all browsers. Coding in IE only and you can be relatively assured it won''t work in all browsers.

推荐答案

是的我正在编写w3标准的编码......它只是Firefox有一种不同于IE的解释标签的方式....而且IE 6与IE7不同....等等。


我希望我的应用程序在所有浏览器中看起来都一样。

我只是厌倦了必须发布我的网站以便用它来测试它浏览器以外的浏览器。


我希望能够点击|> Visual Studio中的（播放/启动调试）按钮，让它在Firefox而不是IE中加载网站。

Yeah I''m doing ok coding to the w3 standards...its just that Firefox has a different way of interpreting the tags than IE....and IE 6 is different from IE7....etc.

I would like my apps to look the same way in all browsers.
I''m just getting fed up with having to publish my site in order to test it with a browser other than IE during.

I''d like to be able to hit the |> (play/start debugging) button in Visual Studio and have it load the site in Firefox instead of IE.

如上所述，Firefox比任何版本的IE都更好地解释标准。 IE完全失败了一些代码或者错误解释了那些代码。从来没有，最初在IE中测试代码，或者几乎可以肯定它会在现代浏览器中失败，例如IE以外的任何东西。

As stated above, Firefox interprets the standards far better than any version of IE. It is IE that fails some code altogether or misinterprets what is there. Never, ever initially test code in IE or you are almost guaranteed it will fail in modern browsers such as anything but IE.

好笑，我永远无法使用Firefox来使用CSS。我编写标准代码，W3验证器说我做得很完美，但是firefox中缺少了一半的功能


现在我不是说IE很好，所有人都是意味着是IE6对IE7甚至对如何默认外观有不同的解释，但当我改变某些东西的边界时。我看到的大多数差异都是因为IE的默认对象与firefox默认的不同。我明白了我修复了那些。这很好。

Funny, I can never get firefox to work with CSS. I code to standards, the W3 validators say I''m doing it perfect, yet half the features are missing in firefox

Now I''m not saying IE is good, by all means yes IE6 vs IE7 even have different intrpretations of how to "default look", but when I change the border on something. Most differences I see are because IE''s defaulting for objects is different then how firefox defaults. I get those. I fix those. It''s fine.

好​​笑，我永远无法使用Firefox来使用CSS。我编写标准代码，W3验证器说我做得很完美，但是firefox中缺少了一半的功能


现在我不是说IE很好，所有人都是意味着是IE6对IE7甚至对如何默认外观有不同的解释，但当我改变某些东西的边界时。我看到的大多数差异都是因为IE的默认对象与firefox默认的不同。我明白了我修复了那些。没关系。

Funny, I can never get firefox to work with CSS. I code to standards, the W3 validators say I''m doing it perfect, yet half the features are missing in firefox

Now I''m not saying IE is good, by all means yes IE6 vs IE7 even have different intrpretations of how to "default look", but when I change the border on something. Most differences I see are because IE''s defaulting for objects is different then how firefox defaults. I get those. I fix those. It''s fine.

我发现同样的事情。


-Frinny

I find the same thing.

-Frinny

这篇关于浏览器和W3C标准辩论的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！