MS ACCESS的未来...... [英] Future of MS ACCESS ...
问题描述
大家好！
我的一位客户前几天告诉我她的IT人员告诉她
ACCESS不会那么好继续我们的项目的想法，
因为Access将来不会继续。我没听说过
这个。有没有人更了解它？
IT-People通常更喜欢Oracle。如果他们真的想进入这个
方向，我们的Access应用程序（如果继续）可以用作带有Oracle后端的
前端吗？这是否运作良好？
提前致谢！
Uwe
Uwe Range写道：大家好！
我的一位客户前几天告诉我她的IT人员告诉她
ACCESS继续我们的项目不会是一个好主意，因为将来不会继续访问。我没听说过这个。有人知道更多吗？
我看到Chicken Little当时是IT经理。
IT-People通常更喜欢Oracle。如果他们真的想要进入这个方向，我们的Access应用程序（如果继续）可以用作带有Oracle后端的前端吗？
是的。
这样做有用吗？
我会让某人做完后回答:-)
-
这个信号留空故意空白
< blockquote> ur****@gmx.de （Uwe Range）写道：
我的一位客户前几天告诉我，她的IT人员告诉她
ACCESS对于继续我们的项目来说不是一个好主意，
因为Access将来不会继续。我没听说过这个。有人知道更多吗？
绝对垃圾。微软有更多的人在下一个版本的Access上工作，而不是过去的几个版本。
IT-People通常更喜欢Oracle。如果他们真的想要进入这个方向，我们的Access应用程序（如果继续）可以用作带有Oracle后端的前端吗？这是否运作良好？
新闻组中的评论来自使用过Access和
Oracle的人。我不记得任何具体的负面评论，所以至少他们
一起工作。 Dunno虽然有多好。
Tony
-
Tony Toews，Microsoft Access MVP
请只在新闻组中回复，以便其他人可以阅读整个消息主题。
Microsoft Access Links，Hints，Tips&会计系统
http://www.granite.ab.ca /accsmstr.htm
2005年2月17日08:11:02 -0800，Uwe Range< ur **** @ gmx.de>写道：
我的一位客户前几天告诉我她的IT人员告诉她
ACCESS对于继续我们的项目来说不是一个好主意，
因为将来不会继续访问。我没听说过这个。有没有人更了解它？
IT人员通常更喜欢Oracle。如果他们真的想要进入这个方向，我们的Access应用程序（如果继续）可以用作带有Oracle后端的前端吗？这是否运作良好？
我没有内幕信息，但是，我根据MS历史和最近的
开发的猜测是Access将继续在Office的下一个版本中，
然而，我们知道VBA将会死亡，取而代之的是VB.Net（VBA.Net？），
DAO将是消失了，取而代之的是ADO.Net，Jet将被新的
SQL Server 2005个人版取代，如果MS能够在
时间内一起玩，那么2005年末发布。
与.Net Framework一样，SQL Server个人版将在2005年之后的每个XP安装上标准化为
，并且越来越多。 Net Framework和SQL
将不需要重新设计您的Access应用程序，只需花费更多的钱在后端上。
。然后，除了MS SQL Server，除了IIS之外的任何其他Web服务器，任何其他
操作系统但是Windows XP Server，你将永远切换到任何其他的b $ b数据库是愚蠢的。 ，或任何其他游戏设备，但X-Box。
除非它着火。
Darryl Kerkeslager
Hi to all!
A customer of mine told me some days ago that her IT-people told her
ACCESS would not be such a good idea for continuing with our project,
because Access will not be continued in the future. I haven''t heard of
this. Does anybody know more about it?
The IT-People usually prefer Oracle. If they really want to go in this
direction, could our Access-application (if continued) be used as a
front end with an Oracle back end? Does this work well?
Thanks in advance!
Uwe
Uwe Range wrote:Hi to all!
A customer of mine told me some days ago that her IT-people told her
ACCESS would not be such a good idea for continuing with our project,
because Access will not be continued in the future. I haven''t heard of
this. Does anybody know more about it?
I see Chicken Little made IT Manager then.
The IT-People usually prefer Oracle. If they really want to go in this
direction, could our Access-application (if continued) be used as a
front end with an Oracle back end?
Yes.
Does this work well?
I''ll let someone who''s done it answer that :-)
--
This sig left intentionally blank
ur****@gmx.de (Uwe Range) wrote:
A customer of mine told me some days ago that her IT-people told her
ACCESS would not be such a good idea for continuing with our project,
because Access will not be continued in the future. I haven''t heard of
this. Does anybody know more about it?
Absolute rubbish. There are a lot more folks at Microsoft working on the next
version of Access than there have been for the last several versions.
The IT-People usually prefer Oracle. If they really want to go in this
direction, could our Access-application (if continued) be used as a
front end with an Oracle back end? Does this work well?
There have been comments in the newsgroup from folks who have worked with Access and
Oracle a fair bit. I don''t recall any specific negative comments so at least they
work together. Dunno how well though.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
On 17 Feb 2005 08:11:02 -0800, Uwe Range <ur****@gmx.de> wrote:
A customer of mine told me some days ago that her IT-people told her
ACCESS would not be such a good idea for continuing with our project,
because Access will not be continued in the future. I haven''t heard of
this. Does anybody know more about it?
The IT-People usually prefer Oracle. If they really want to go in this
direction, could our Access-application (if continued) be used as a
front end with an Oracle back end? Does this work well?
I have no inside info, but, my speculation based on MS history and recent
developments is that Access will continue in the next version of Office,
however, VBA as we know it will be dead, replaced by VB.Net (VBA.Net?),
DAO will be gone, replaced by ADO.Net, and Jet will be replaced by the new
SQL Server 2005 Personal Edition, if MS can get it all playing together in
time for a late 2005 release.
Like the .Net Framework, SQL Server Personal Edition will be standard on
every XP install after 2005, and more and more the .Net Framework and SQL
Server will be interwoven with Windows. Your upgrade path to SQL Server
will not entail redesigning your Access app, just spending more money on
the back end. You will be foolish to ever switch, then, to any other
database other than MS SQL Server, any other web server but IIS, any other
OS but Windows XP Server, or any other game device but X-Box.
Unless it catches fire.
Darryl Kerkeslager
这篇关于MS ACCESS的未来......的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
