哪些硬件升级更重要 [英] Which hardware upgrades are more important
问题描述
我知道这是一个很难回答的问题，但我对
的意见感兴趣，建议使用以下内容进行硬件升级。
Access 2000在拆分配置中运行，但都在终端服务器中运行。目前
15位用户。这意味着所有文件都驻留在服务器上，并且所有处理都发生在那里。后端目前是Access，但它将升级为SQL
Server。所以对于这个问题假设SQL Server后端。
那么你会优先考虑内存，多处理器，
处理器速度，硬盘速度，显卡等等。这些只是
无关紧要而且不值得担心，虽然我认为没有。
我知道Access推荐的要求。这是你真实世界的经历
我更感兴趣。
杰夫
I know this is a difficult one to answer, but I am interested in opinions on
what hardware upgrades would be recommended with the following.
Access 2000 running in a split config, but all in Terminal Server. Currently
15 users. This means that all files reside on the server and all processing
happens there. Back-end is currently Access, but it will be upsized to SQL
Server . So for this question assume SQL Server back-end.
So what priority would you give to things like memory, multiple processors,
processor speed, hard drive speed, graphics cards etc. And which are just
irrelevant and not worth worrying about, though I assume none are.
I know the Access recommended requirements. It is your real world experience
that I am more interested in.
Jeff
推荐答案
内存将在列表中排在第1位，因为TS和SQL都是很多，而不是
RAM。我建议最少4GB的RAM和尽可能多的处理器，因为你可以获得
。如果您要在
相同的服务器上运行，则尤其如此。
Memory would be number 1 on the list as both TS snd SQL like lot''s of
RAM. I would recommend a min of 4GB of RAM and as much processor as you
can get. This is especially true if you are going to run both on the
same server.
" Jeff" < JE ************ @ asken.com.au>写在
news：43 *********************** @ per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au ：
"Jeff" <je************@asken.com.au> wrote in
news:43***********************@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:
我知道这是一个很难回答的问题，但我对
以下建议的硬件升级意见感兴趣。
Access 2000在拆分配置中运行，但都在终端服务器中。
目前有15个用户。这意味着所有文件都驻留在服务器上，并且所有处理都在那里进行。后端目前是Access，
但它将升级到SQL Server。所以对于这个问题假设是SQL Server的后端。
那么你会优先考虑内存，多处理器，处理器速度，硬盘速度，显卡等问题
哪些只是无关紧要而且不值得担心，但我不认为没有。
我知道Access推荐的要求。这是你对我更感兴趣的现实世界的经验。
I know this is a difficult one to answer, but I am interested in
opinions on what hardware upgrades would be recommended with the
following.
Access 2000 running in a split config, but all in Terminal Server.
Currently 15 users. This means that all files reside on the server
and all processing happens there. Back-end is currently Access,
but it will be upsized to SQL Server . So for this question assume
SQL Server back-end.
So what priority would you give to things like memory, multiple
processors, processor speed, hard drive speed, graphics cards etc.
And which are just irrelevant and not worth worrying about, though
I assume none are.
I know the Access recommended requirements. It is your real world
experience that I am more interested in.
访问是您最不担心的事情。
我永远不会把SQL Server放在终端服务器上，如果它是服务在TS上托管的应用程序的
- 我会把它放在另一台机器上。
RAM基本上是TS问题。我不知道官方
建议是什么，但我喜欢每个并发用户有256MB。
但也许你只需要64MB。我不知道。
更多关于RAM的更好。
别忘了带宽你的联系。我最近的一个
客户端最近在他们的互联网上建立了千兆交换机
连接，这使得TS访问更加流畅。
-
David W. Fenton http：//www.dfenton。 com /
usenet at dfenton dot com http： //www.dfenton.com/DFA/
像Blue Gene / L这样的东西应该足够了。
（只是一个猜测！）
Something like the Blue Gene/L should be adequate.
(just a guess!)
这篇关于哪些硬件升级更重要的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
