为什么.Net UI比C ++或经典VB慢？ [英] Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
问题描述
我已经注意到（现在已经很长一段时间了）.Net用户界面没有那么敏感
（参见Franklin Covey的Windows XP PlanPlus或赛门铁克的.Net Norton
防病毒甚至是华盛顿大学完成的.Net版本的涂料与
好的旧涂料用户界面的例子）。
它们也不像老版应用程序那样专业，而且用户界面的反应时间并不专业。
为什么你认为这个是什么？这是不好的编程还是还有别的东西
在这里？
I''ve noticed (for quite some time now) that .Net UIs are not as responsive
(see Franklin Covey''s PlanPlus for Windows XP or Symantec''s .Net Norton
Antivirus or even the .Net version of Paint done by Washington University vs
good old Paint UIs for examples).
They are also not as professional looking as the older applications and the
reaction times of the UIs is not professional looking at all.
Why do you think this is? Is it bad programming or is there something else
going on here?
推荐答案
对于那些想要回答这个问题的人，
也许首先阅读这个帖子是正确的。
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...8eada042806d5a
Cor
For those who want to answer this,
Maybe it is right to read this thread first.
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...8eada042806d5a
Cor
特别是这一个.....
http://groups.google.com/group/micro ... 8eada042806d5a
Jim
" Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <无************ @ planet.nl>在消息中写道
新闻：Oc ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl ...
Especially this one.....
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...8eada042806d5a
Jim
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <no************@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:Oc**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
对于那些想要的人回答这个问题，
也许首先阅读这个帖子是正确的。
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...8eada042806d5a
Cor
For those who want to answer this,
Maybe it is right to read this thread first.
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...8eada042806d5a
Cor
" Jim Hubbard" <再*** @ groups.please>写道：
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.please> wrote:
我已经注意到（很长一段时间以来）.Net用户界面没有那么敏感（参见Franklin Covey的Windows XP PlanPlus或赛门铁克的.Net Norton
Antivirus甚至华盛顿大学完成的.Net版本的涂料与
良好的旧版Paint UI相比）。
它们也不是专业人士看起来像旧的应用程序和用户界面的反应时间并不专业。
为什么你认为这是？这是不好的编程还是还有什么东西在这里？
I''ve noticed (for quite some time now) that .Net UIs are not as responsive
(see Franklin Covey''s PlanPlus for Windows XP or Symantec''s .Net Norton
Antivirus or even the .Net version of Paint done by Washington University vs
good old Paint UIs for examples).
They are also not as professional looking as the older applications and the
reaction times of the UIs is not professional looking at all.
Why do you think this is? Is it bad programming or is there something else
going on here?
我同意。我认为（并且希望）与GDI +有很多关系，而不是加速（并且它可能永远不会像WPF那样接近）。
我想要的东西特别注意的是，使用
大量嵌套容器调整表单的逻辑是特别昂贵的。非常滞后调整大小
的16个左右的嵌套容器不应该让3GHz
机器慢慢爬行，但它可以做到的！
- 巴里
I agree. I think (and hope) it''s a lot to do with GDI+ not being
accelerated (and it probably will never be, as WPF approaches).
Something I''ve especially noticed is that resize logic for forms with
lots of nested containers is especially expensive. Very laggy resizing
of 16 or so nested containers of different kinds shouldn''t slow a 3GHz
machine to a crawl, but it can and does!
-- Barry
这篇关于为什么.Net UI比C ++或经典VB慢？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
