Microsoft Access产品组希望得到您的帮助！ [英] The Microsoft Access Product Group Wants Your Help!
问题描述
（重新发布，由于缺少提交内容......）
Microsoft Access产品组（构建Microsoft的人员
Access）想要你的帮助！
我们正在为不久的将来工作的主要事情之一是使用Microsoft Access 97数据库的
转换工具（主要是，但是，对于微软来说，微软Access 2000或2002 / XP数据库也可以是b / b
Office Access 2003.对于我们这样做，我们需要来自
$的样本数据库。 b $ b *你*，我们的客户，以确保一个高质量的工具。
如果你愿意参与帮助我们建立一个质量
转换工具，请将您的Microsoft Access 97,2000或
2002 / XP数据库发送到 AC **** *@MICROSOFT.COM 。当您提交数据库时，
请记住：
*您将不会收到此数据库的副本。
*我们将使用这些数据库进行内部测试
* only *。
它们应该是.mdb文件，广泛使用的数据库和生产。
数据将是保密的，因此如果您想要包含虚拟的数据或实际数据，那当然没问题。
如果我们有一些安全的数据库会很好，但是如果你不满意的话可以理解。
再次，这些将保密，用于内部测试目的
*仅*。
发送文件的电子邮件地址是： AC*****@MICROSOFT.COM
***请将由于Outlook安全性，请务必压缩数据库。 ***
----------------------------
Chuck'的评论：
如果您发送实际数据，请务必将其删除。更改
命名为随机字母的字符串，地址为愚蠢的东西
（anytown，USA可能会有相当多的人口
爆炸！），电话号码，SSN，费率，费用等也应该是b $ b更改。
" Chuck Grimsby" < C。******* @ worldnet.att.net>在消息中写道
新闻：5f ************************* @ posting.google.co m ... < blockquote class =post_quotes>（重新发布，由于缺少提交......）
因为如果你考虑一下，请求就是荒谬的。
Chuck Grimsby写道：
< snipped>
我不喜欢不信任你！
说真的，URL在哪里？微软不会发布这样的公共新闻组，或者使用中介机构，这些都没有意义。唯一安全的方式
微软可以通过他们的网站与用户/开发人员进行沟通。
我相信他们在测试和开发方面有丰富的经验。 >
产品，无论我们对最终结果多么沮丧。这一点
已经是beta测试者等等。
我真的不知道你的帖子想要实现什么，但它仍然是
非常可疑。
这是合法的。
因为Chuck发布了这个小组的每日常见问题解答，获得MVP的Rita Nikas
领先，过去已多次向他发送物品。我记得
特别是今年早些时候访问10周年的一些帖子
。 （哎呀，是我一开始就把她放在了他身上！）
如果你检查一下microsoft.public.access。*组，你会看到她
自己发布了这些请求。例如，
http ：//groups.google.com/groups？selm ... SFTNGP12.phx.g
bl
我可以向她建议他们把这个放在网上，但考虑到请求的短期性质（以及这是在雷德蒙德度过的漫长周末），我
怀疑他们会打扰。
-
Doug Steele，Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
" Deano" <毫安************ @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道
新闻：L _ ******************* @ wards.force9.net ...Chuck Grimsby写道：
< snipped>
我不相信你！
说真的，URL在哪里？微软不会发布这样的公共新闻组
或使用中介 - 没有任何意义。微软可以通过他们的网站与用户/开发人员进行沟通的唯一安全方式。
我相信他们在测试和开发产品方面拥有丰富的经验，无论我们多么沮丧关于最终结果。那个测试人员已经到位了。
我真的不知道你的帖子想要实现什么，但它仍然很可疑。
(Repost, due to lack of submissions...)
The Microsoft Access Product Group (the people who build Microsoft
Access) want your help!
One of the main things we''re working on for the near future is a
conversion tool to take Microsoft Access 97 databases (primarily, but
also Microsoft Access 2000 or 2002/XP databases) up to Microsoft
Office Access 2003. For us to do this, we need sample databases from
*you*, our customers, to ensure a quality tool.
If you''re willing to paricipate in helping us build a quality
conversion tool, please send your Microsoft Access 97, 2000, or
2002/XP database to AC*****@MICROSOFT.COM. When you submit a database,
please keep in mind:
* You won''t be receiving a copy of this database back.
* We will be using these databases for internal testing purposes
*only*.
They should be .mdb files, databases in wide use and production.
The data will be confidential, so if you want to include either dummy
data or real data, that''s certainly fine.
It''d be nice if we had some secured databases, but understandable if
you aren''t comfortable with that.
Again, these will remain confidential for internal testing purposes
*only*.
The email address to send the files to is: AC*****@MICROSOFT.COM
*** Please be sure to zip the database due to Outlook security. ***
----------------------------
Chuck''s comment:
If you send in real data, please be sure to obfusicate it. Change
Names to strings of random letters, addresses to something silly
("anytown, USA" is probably going to have quite the population
explosion!), Phone Numbers, SSNs, Rates, Costs, etc. should also be
changed.
"Chuck Grimsby" <c.*******@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:5f*************************@posting.google.co m...(Repost, due to lack of submissions...)
Because if you think about it, the request is f*cking ridiculous.
Chuck Grimsby wrote:
<snipped>
I don''t believe you!
Seriously, where''s the URL? Microsoft don''t post to public newsgroups such
as this or use intermediaries - makes no sense. The only secure way
Microsoft can communicate with users/developers is through their website.
And I''m sure they have plenty of experience in testing and developing
products, however much we might bleat about the end results. The point
being that beta testers etc are already in place.
I really have no idea what your post is trying to achieve but it remains
quite suspicious.
It''s legitimate.
Since Chuck posts the daily FAQ for this group, Rita Nikas, the Access MVP
lead, has sent him items to post several times in the past. I recall
specifically some of the posts around the 10th anniversary of Access earlier
this year. (Heck, it was me who sicced her on him in the first place!)
And if you check the microsoft.public.access.* groups, you''ll see that she
posted these requests there herself. For example,
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...SFTNGP12.phx.g
bl
I can suggest to her that they put this on the web, but given the short-term
nature of the request (and the fact that it''s a long weekend in Redmond), I
doubt they''ll bother.
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
"Deano" <ma************@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:L_*******************@wards.force9.net...Chuck Grimsby wrote:
<snipped>
I don''t believe you!
Seriously, where''s the URL? Microsoft don''t post to public newsgroups such as this or use intermediaries - makes no sense. The only secure way
Microsoft can communicate with users/developers is through their website.
And I''m sure they have plenty of experience in testing and developing
products, however much we might bleat about the end results. The point
being that beta testers etc are already in place.
I really have no idea what your post is trying to achieve but it remains
quite suspicious.
这篇关于Microsoft Access产品组希望得到您的帮助！的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
