Python 2.5许可：停止此更改 [英] Python 2.5 licensing: stop this change

问题描述

作为Python软件基金会的唯一董事，投票反对最近的董事会议案，以实施

中描述的许可条款变更 http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/ .. .ng-change.html


我想记录我对这一变化的抗议。我认为

它会损害Python语言并最终适得其反，

减少用户群并阻止开源程序员从

贡献代码库。


如果你不同意这个提议的改变，那么做一些关于它的事情还为时不晚。如果这个改变继续进行，那将是我们所知道的结束。


问候

Steve

-

Steve Holden [phone] [phone]

Holden Web LLC / Ltd www.holdenweb.com

爱我，爱我的博客holdenweb.blogspot.com

解决方案

我说好摆脱。 Python的成功始终是它的优点，因为它是一个开源应用程序平台。公司的使用一直是相对微不足道的，而且我怀疑很多公司都在过度表达他们对python的依赖程度。

试图引导他们的竞争对手进入这种开源的

许可证陷阱。


我全都是为了这个改变。现在是关于啤酒免费的时间了。

a python的双关语。

史蒂夫霍尔登写道：

作为Python软件基金会的唯一董事，投票反对最近的董事会议案，以实施

<中描述的许可条款的变更a rel =nofollowhref =http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.htmltarget =_ blank> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006 /04/...ng-change.html

我想记录下我对此变化的抗议。我认为它会损害Python语言并最终适得其反，减少用户群并阻止开源程序员为代码库做出贡献。
如果你不同意这个提议的改变，那么做一些关于它的事情还为时不晚。如果这个改变继续进行，那将是我们所知道的Python的结束。

问候语史基尔
-
史蒂夫霍尔登+44 150 684 7255 [phone]
Holden Web LLC / Ltd www.holdenweb.com
爱我，爱我的博客holdenweb.blogspot.com

我在新许可证上+1，因为我想花很多钱好的

产品。


我自己的接受更接近Xah Lees：让我们最终负责

并找到保险与Python脚本相关的各种损害

用法。 PSF从保险费中获得的部分资金可以捐赠给一个慈善基金会，该基金会关心印度儿童因为蛇咬伤而遭受的损失。

Steve Holden写道：

作为Python软件基金会唯一投票反对的导演
最近董事会动议实施

中描述的许可条款变更 http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/...ng-change.html

我想放在记录我对这一变化的抗议。我认为它会损害Python语言并最终适得其反，减少用户群并阻止开源程序员为代码库做出贡献。
如果你不同意这个提议的改变，那么做一些关于它的事情还为时不晚。如果这个改变继续进行，那将是我们所知道的Python结束。


我可以要求澄清。这笔费用适用于基于Python源代码的任何商业用途

衍生作品？


使用Python的普通应用程序，包括提供标准的商品/>
CPython作为可执行文件，使用像py2exe这样的工具，不会被覆盖。

对吗？


这是否适用于商业应用程序嵌入Python

解释器？ （看起来会这样）


一切顺利，


Fuzzyman
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml

问候
Steve
-
Steve Holden [phone] [phone]
Holden Web LLC / Ltd www.holdenweb.com
爱我，爱我的博客holdenweb.blogspot.com

As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in

http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/...ng-change.html

I would like to place on record my protest against this change. I think
it will harm the Python language and ultimately be counter-productive,
reducing the user base and discouraging open source programmers from
contributing to the code base.

If you disagree with this proposed change it''s not too late to do
something about it. If this change goes ahead it will be the end of
Python as we know it.

regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden [phone] [phone]
Holden Web LLC/Ltd www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog holdenweb.blogspot.com

解决方案

I say good riddence. Python''s success has always been on its merits as
an open source application platform. Corprate usage has always been
relatively insignificant, and I suspect that many companies are
overrepresenting the level of dependance they have on python in an
attempt to steer their competitors into just this kind of open source
license trap.

I am all for this change. It is about time that free as in beer became
a double entendre for python.

Steve Holden wrote:

As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in

http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/...ng-change.html

I would like to place on record my protest against this change. I think
it will harm the Python language and ultimately be counter-productive,
reducing the user base and discouraging open source programmers from
contributing to the code base.

If you disagree with this proposed change it''s not too late to do
something about it. If this change goes ahead it will be the end of
Python as we know it.

regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden [phone] [phone]
Holden Web LLC/Ltd www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog holdenweb.blogspot.com

I''m +1 on the new license because I want to spend good money for good
products.

My own take is more close to Xah Lees: lets be ultimately responsible
and found an insurance for all kind of damages related to Python script
usages. Part of the money the PSF earns for insurance fees could be
donated to a charitable foundation that cares for indian children that
suffer from snake bites.

Steve Holden wrote:

As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in

http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/...ng-change.html

I would like to place on record my protest against this change. I think
it will harm the Python language and ultimately be counter-productive,
reducing the user base and discouraging open source programmers from
contributing to the code base.

If you disagree with this proposed change it''s not too late to do
something about it. If this change goes ahead it will be the end of
Python as we know it.

Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?

Normal applications that use Python, including bunding the standard
CPython as an executable, using tools like py2exe, won''t be covered.
Right ?

Does this cover commercial applications that embed the Python
interpreter ? (Looks like it will)

All the best,

Fuzzyman
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden [phone] [phone]
Holden Web LLC/Ltd www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog holdenweb.blogspot.com

这篇关于Python 2.5许可：停止此更改的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！