jQuery值得一看吗？ [英] Is jQuery worth a second look?

问题描述

这里的一些常客是否需要重新考虑他们（有时候是b / b
）反对图书馆？微软和诺基亚都宣布支持jQuery。


似乎已经获得了相当大的动力，可以考虑

a对于那些想要使用全功能，支持
的库的人来说是合理的选择吗？


< URL： http://jquery.com/blog/2008/09/28/jq ... crosoft-nokia / >

-

Rob

Do some of the regulars here need to re-think their (sometimes
strident) opposition to libraries? Both Microsoft and Nokia have
announced support for jQuery.

It seems to have gained quite a bit of momentum, can it be considered
a reasonable choice for those who want to use a full-featured, well
supported library?

<URL: http://jquery.com/blog/2008/09/28/jq...crosoft-nokia/ >
--
Rob

推荐答案

RobG< rg *** @ iinet.net.auwrites：

RobG <rg***@iinet.net.auwrites:

这里的一些常客需要重新考虑他们（有时候是

strident）反对图书馆？微软和诺基亚都宣布支持jQuery。

Do some of the regulars here need to re-think their (sometimes
strident) opposition to libraries? Both Microsoft and Nokia have
announced support for jQuery.

为什么他们需要支持它？它应该是跨平台的，已经是b $ b。对吗？


哦，我明白了... MS和诺基亚正在谈论*使用*它。不确定

是否非常支持。

Why would they need to "support" it? It ought to be cross-platform
already. Right?

Oh, I see... MS and Nokia are talking about *using* it. Not sure if
that''s much of an endorsement.

似乎已经获得了相当大的动力，是不是考虑

a对于那些想要使用全功能，支持
支持的库的人来说，这是合理的选择吗？

It seems to have gained quite a bit of momentum, can it be considered
a reasonable choice for those who want to use a full-featured, well
supported library?

FTR：我根本不反对图书馆。只是大多数我看起来都是在解决错误的问题和/或以一种令人费解和丑陋的方式解决一小部分有趣的问题。 （我在看你，

Prototype.js）


-

Joost Diepenmaat |博客： http://joost.zeekat.nl/ |工作： http://zeekat.nl/

FTR: I''m not against libraries at all. It''s just that most I''ve looked
at solve the wrong problems and/or solve a small subset of interesting
problems in quite a convoluted and ugly way (I''m looking at you,
Prototype.js)

--
Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/

9月29日，8：36 * am，Joost Diepenmaat< jo ... @ zeekat.nlwrote：

On Sep 29, 8:36*am, Joost Diepenmaat <[e-mail]:

RobG< rg ... @ iinet.net.auwrites：

RobG <[e-mail]:

这里的一些常客需要重新考虑他们（有时候是b / b
）反对图书馆？ *微软和诺基亚都宣布支持jQuery。

Do some of the regulars here need to re-think their (sometimes
strident) opposition to libraries? *Both Microsoft and Nokia have
announced support for jQuery.

为什么他们需要支持它？它应该是跨平台的，已经是b $ b。对？

Why would they need to "support" it? It ought to be cross-platform
already. Right?

" Support"就像鼓励开发人员在他们的平台上使用它一样。

"Support" as in encourage developers on their platforms to use it.

哦，我明白了...... MS和诺基亚正在谈论*使用*它。不确定

是否支持。

Oh, I see... MS and Nokia are talking about *using* it. Not sure if
that''s much of an endorsement.

他们已经比这更进一步，他们用

支持它们的开发工具。微软在Visual Studio中包含一个intellisense-

注释版本，而不是开发竞争对手的b $ b组件，诺基亚正在他们的Web运行时中加入。他们的基于WebKit的浏览器在Symbian上运行并基于它们内置的

小部件。

They''ve gone a bit further than that, they are supporting it with
their development tools. Microsoft is including an intellisense-
annotated version in Visual Studio and not developing competing
components, Nokia are putting in in their "Web Run-Time" for their
WebKit-based browser running on Symbian and basing their built-in
widgets on it.

似乎已经获得了相当多的动力，可以考虑

a对于那些想要使用全功能的人来说是合理的选择

支持的库？

It seems to have gained quite a bit of momentum, can it be considered
a reasonable choice for those who want to use a full-featured, well
supported library?

FTR：我根本不反对图书馆。只是大多数我看起来都是在解决错误的问题和/或以一种令人费解和丑陋的方式解决一小部分有趣的问题。 （我在看着你，

Prototype.js）

FTR: I''m not against libraries at all. It''s just that most I''ve looked
at solve the wrong problems and/or solve a small subset of interesting
problems in quite a convoluted and ugly way (I''m looking at you,
Prototype.js)

Prototype.js的支持者似乎有点害怕

jQuery。这是扩展原生对象的策略而不是

Prototype.js的宿主对象的扩展似乎是更好的选择。

-

Rob

Prototype.js supporters seem a bit intimidated by the success of
jQuery. It''s strategy of extending a native object rather
Prototype.js''s extension of host objects seems to be a better choice.
--
Rob

RobG写道：

RobG wrote:

9月29日上午8：36，Joost Diepenmaat < jo ... @ zeekat.nlwrote：

On Sep 29, 8:36 am, Joost Diepenmaat <[e-mail]:

> RobG< rg ... @ iinet.net.auwrites：

>RobG <[e-mail]:

>>这里的一些常客是否需要重新思考他们（有时候是尖锐的）对图书馆的反对意见？微软和诺基亚都宣布支持jQuery。

>>Do some of the regulars here need to re-think their (sometimes
strident) opposition to libraries? Both Microsoft and Nokia have
announced support for jQuery.

为什么他们需要支持它？它本来应该是跨平台的。对？

Why would they need to "support" it? It ought to be cross-platform
already. Right?

" Support"就像鼓励开发人员在他们的平台上使用它一样。

"Support" as in encourage developers on their platforms to use it.

>哦，我明白了...... MS和诺基亚正在谈论*使用*它。不确定这是否是一个非常认可的。

>Oh, I see... MS and Nokia are talking about *using* it. Not sure if
that''s much of an endorsement.

他们已经比这更进一步，他们用

支持它们的开发工具。微软在Visual Studio中包含一个intellisense-

注释版本，而不是开发竞争对手的b $ b组件，诺基亚正在他们的Web运行时中加入。他们的基于WebKit的浏览器在Symbian上运行并基于内置的

小部件。

They''ve gone a bit further than that, they are supporting it with
their development tools. Microsoft is including an intellisense-
annotated version in Visual Studio and not developing competing
components, Nokia are putting in in their "Web Run-Time" for their
WebKit-based browser running on Symbian and basing their built-in
widgets on it.

绝对值得客观地看一看。行业认真对待这段代码，所以理解它是个好主意，而b / b $ b b这样做，应该客观地审查。

Absolutely worth taking a look at objectively. The code is taken quite
seriously by the industry, so it''s a good idea to understand it and to
do that, it should be objectively reviewed.

>>它似乎已经获得了相当大的动力，可以被认为是

>>It seems to have gained quite a bit of momentum, can it be considered
a reasonable choice for those who want to use a full-featured, well
supported library?

好​​问题。我认为现在是进行代码审查的时候了。

Good question. I think it''s time for a code review.

>


-

Rob

>

--
Rob

这篇关于jQuery值得一看吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！