为什么,为什么呢。 [英] Why, oh why.

查看:87
本文介绍了为什么,为什么呢。的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我最近看到一些程序员使用


string s = String.Empty;


而不是传统的


string s ="" ;;


是否有任何合乎逻辑的原因或只是OOP势利?

问候<一些用它来提高可读性。


Frank Rizzo <无** @ none.com>在消息中写道

新闻:OB ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ...

我见过最近一些程序员使用


string s = String.Empty;


而不是传统的


string s ="" ;;


是否有任何合乎逻辑的原因或只是OOP势利?

问候


弗兰克,


这是OOP势利,我全心全意地订阅它=)

-

- Nicholas Paldino [.NET / C#MVP]

- mv*@spam.guard。 caspershouse.com


" Frank Rizzo" <无** @ none.com>在消息中写道

新闻:OB ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ...

我见过最近一些程序员使用

字符串s = String.Empty;

而不是传统的

字符串s ="" ;;

是否有任何合乎逻辑的原因或只是OOP势利?
问候





" Frank Rizzo <无** @ none.com>在消息中写道

新闻:OB ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ...

我见过最近一些程序员使用

字符串s = String.Empty;

而不是传统的

字符串s ="" ;;

是否有任何合乎逻辑的原因或只是OOP势利?
问候




为什么要使用它?嗯,有时它比阅读''更难以阅读 &安培; String.Empty& "" ;.这只是一个原因......那里有

是其他人...但是如果你按照这些方式行,那么为了保持一致性,

String.Empty将是还有去的方式:)


这是势利的吗?当然可以......我知道我用它了

理由......势利......一句话:)


Mythran


I''ve seen recently some programmers using

string s = String.Empty;

instead of traditional

string s = "";

Is there any logical reason for this or just OOP snobbery?
Regards

解决方案

Some use it for better readability.

"Frank Rizzo" <no**@none.com> wrote in message
news:OB**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I''ve seen recently some programmers using

string s = String.Empty;

instead of traditional

string s = "";

Is there any logical reason for this or just OOP snobbery?
Regards


Frank,

It''s OOP snobbery, and I whole-heartedly subscribe to it =)
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Frank Rizzo" <no**@none.com> wrote in message
news:OB**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...

I''ve seen recently some programmers using

string s = String.Empty;

instead of traditional

string s = "";

Is there any logical reason for this or just OOP snobbery?
Regards




"Frank Rizzo" <no**@none.com> wrote in message
news:OB**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...

I''ve seen recently some programmers using

string s = String.Empty;

instead of traditional

string s = "";

Is there any logical reason for this or just OOP snobbery?
Regards



Why use it? Well, sometimes it''s a little more difficult to read "''""''"
than it is to read "''" & String.Empty & "''". That''s just one reason...there
are others...but if you go along these lines, then for consistency,
String.Empty would be the way to go as well :)

Is it snobbery? Sure can be...I know I use it for that
reason...snobbery...what a word :)

Mythran


这篇关于为什么,为什么呢。的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆