Visual Studio 6或.NET for C ++？ [英] Visual Studio 6 or .NET for C++?
问题描述
我准备将一个中等大小的程序从不同的
环境移到Windows上。该程序是用C ++编写的
我可以选择Visual Studio 6或Visual Studio .NET 2002.
什么是专业人员和这两个环境的缺点是一个直接的C ++
windows应用程序。 VS .NET能给我一个更好的编译器吗？怎么样？在可预见的未来，管理的
代码功能无关紧要。
谢谢，
++ PLS
" Paul Schauble" < 4V ******* @ spamex.com>在消息中写道
新闻：MP ************************ @ msnews.microsoft.c om ...我可以选择Visual Studio 6
这个是五六年。
或Visual Studio .NET 2002。
这个大约两年了。
与VS.Net 2003一起使用，它有最好的编译器来一段时间没有MS了。
问候，
将
Paul Schauble写道：< blockquote class =post_quotes>我要将一个中等大小的程序从不同的环境移到Windows上。该程序是用C ++编写的
我可以选择Visual Studio 6或Visual Studio .NET 2002.
这两种环境对于直线的优缺点是什么？
C ++ windows app。 VS .NET能给我一个更好的编译器吗？怎么样？在可预见的未来，管理代码功能没有任何意义。
因为你是从一个不同的环境搬家的，所以理所当然
代码不是基于MFC的。如果是的话，很多人会建议使用
VC6。
对于直接的C ++，Visual Studio .NET 2003就是你想要的。如果2002
是你唯一的选择，那么就语言
一致性而言，它比VC6好一点，并且在标准库一致性方面要好得多。 />
-cd
" Carl Daniel [VC ++ MVP]" < cp ***************************** @ mvps.org.nospam>
写道：
由于您正在从不同的环境迁移，因此可以理解代码不是基于MFC的。如果是的话，很多人会建议使用
VC6。
Carl，我从来没有听说过。你能解释一下为什么会这样吗？在VC.NET中，
MFC是否达到了彼得原则。限制？
-
- Tim Roberts， ti ** @ probo.com
Providenza& Boekelheide，Inc
I''m about to move a moderately large program from a different
environment onto Windows. The program is written in C++
I have a choice of Visual Studio 6 or Visual Studio .NET 2002.
What are the pros and cons of these two environments for a straight C++
windows app. Does VS .NET get me a better compiler? How? The managed
code features are of no interest in the foreseeable future.
Thanks,
++PLS
"Paul Schauble" <4v*******@spamex.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@msnews.microsoft.c om...I have a choice of Visual Studio 6
This one is five or six years old.
or Visual Studio .NET 2002.
This one is about two years old.
Go with VS.Net 2003, it has the best compiler to come out of MS in a while.
Regards,
Will
Paul Schauble wrote:I''m about to move a moderately large program from a different
environment onto Windows. The program is written in C++
I have a choice of Visual Studio 6 or Visual Studio .NET 2002.
What are the pros and cons of these two environments for a straight
C++ windows app. Does VS .NET get me a better compiler? How? The
managed code features are of no interest in the foreseeable future.
Since you''re moving from a different environment, it stands to reason that
the code is not MFC-based. If it were, many people would recommend using
VC6.
For straight C++, Visual Studio .NET 2003 is really what you want. If 2002
is your only option, it''s a little better than VC6 with regard to language
conformance, and a lot better with regard to standard library conformance.
-cd
"Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]" <cp*****************************@mvps.org.nospam >
wrote:
Since you''re moving from a different environment, it stands to reason that
the code is not MFC-based. If it were, many people would recommend using
VC6.
Carl, I''ve never heard that. Can you explain why this should be? Has the
MFC in VC.NET reached its "Peter Principle" limit?
--
- Tim Roberts, ti**@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc
这篇关于Visual Studio 6或.NET for C ++？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
