指针表示：风格还是实质？ [英] pointer representation: style or substance?

问题描述

之间有什么区别：


char *指针;

char *指针;


是美学的选择还是这表示真正的差异？


Zach

Is there any difference between:

char *pointer;
char* pointer;

Is the choice one of aesthetics or does this denote real differences?

Zach

推荐答案

2月19日下午1:06，Zach < net ... @ gmail.comwrote：

On Feb 19, 1:06 pm, "Zach" <[e-mail]:

之间有什么区别：


char * pointer;

char *指针;


是选择美学还是这表示真正的差异？

Is there any difference between:

char *pointer;
char* pointer;

Is the choice one of aesthetics or does this denote real differences?

没有真正的区别;选择只是美学之一。


然而，

char *指针;

会误导新手，在那

char * pointer1，pointer2;

可能被误读为

pointer1是指向char的指针

pointer2是一个指向char的指针

而不是

pointer1是指向char的指针

pointer2是一个字母


恕我直言，

char *指针;

更清晰（对于初学者），因为

误读的可能性较小

char * pointer1，pointer2;

如上所述。


HTH

-

Lew

No real difference; the choice is one of aesthetics only.

However,
char* pointer;
can mislead a neophyte, in that
char* pointer1, pointer2;
may be mis-read as
pointer1 is a pointer to char
pointer2 is a pointer to char
rather than
pointer1 is a pointer to char
pointer2 is a char

IMHO,
char *pointer;
is clearer (to the neophyte), in that there is less chance of
misreading
char *pointer1, pointer2;
as above.

HTH
--
Lew

2月19日下午1:13，Lew Pitcher < lpitc ... @ sympatico.cawrote：

On Feb 19, 1:13 pm, "Lew Pitcher" <[e-mail]:

>

没有真正的区别;选择只是一种美学。

>
No real difference; the choice is one of aesthetics only.

谢谢Lew。


Zach

Thanks Lew.

Zach

" Zach" < ne **** @ gmail.com写信息

news：11 ********************* @ v45g2000cwv.googlegro ups .com ...

"Zach" <ne****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@v45g2000cwv.googlegro ups.com...

之间有什么区别：


char *指针;

char *指针;


选择美学之一还是这表示真正的差异？

Is there any difference between:

char *pointer;
char* pointer;

Is the choice one of aesthetics or does this denote real differences?

没有区别;这只是个人风格的问题。

然而，第二种风格可能会产生误导，特别是对于新的

程序员：


char * ptr1，ptr2;


这里，ptr1是一个指向char的指针，但是ptr1只是一个char。


char * x ，y;

以上样式更清楚x是指针但y不是。


-

Fred L. Kleinschmidt

There is no difference; it is just a matter of personal style.
However, the second style can be misleading, especially to new
programmers:

char* ptr1, ptr2;

Here, ptr1 is a pointer to char, but ptr1 is just a char.

char *x, y;
The above style makes it more clear that x is a pointer but y is not.

--
Fred L. Kleinschmidt

这篇关于指针表示：风格还是实质？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！