有人注意到微软不写.Net吗？ [英] Anybody notice that Microsoft doesn't write in .Net?
问题描述
看看Vista中的微软和Windows应用程序....他们不是.Net。
如果.Net太棒了，为什么MS不会使用它更多？事实上，微软在.Net中使用什么桌面应用？
我认为微软在.Net中避免了主要的桌面应用程序，因为它的性能
很糟糕。看看赛门铁克的防病毒应用程序和富兰克林科维的Plan Plus，以及
Windows和Neat Reciepts，你会明白我的意思。 UI性能
很糟糕。
我用.Net的第一个版本说它并且我坚持它...... .Net是
是微软最大的错误之一，但他们从来没有（并且看起来像b
$永远不会）承认或退出错误 - 就像Windows Me一样Vista
或.Net。
太糟糕了。人们知道公司会犯错误 - 毕竟公司运行后人们会花费b $ b。那些不承认错误的公司仍在制造它们，他们只是对他们撒谎。
jim
" jim" < ji*@home.net写在留言中
新闻：SB ******************* @ bignews4.bellsouth.net。 ..
查看Vista中的Microsoft和Windows应用程序....他们不是.Net。
如果.Net太棒了，为什么MS不再使用它？事实上，微软在.Net中使用什么桌面应用程序？
表现很糟糕。看看赛门铁克的防病毒应用程序和Franklin Covey的
Plan Plus for Windows和Neat Reciepts，你会明白我的意思。
UI性能很糟糕。
我用.Net的第一个版本说它，我坚持它...... .Net <
是微软最大的错误之一，但是他们从来没有（并且看起来好像绝不会）承认或背弃错误 - 就是Windows
我，Vista或.Net。
太糟糕了。人们知道公司会犯错误 - 毕竟公司都是由人经营的。那些不承认错误的公司仍然会成功，他们只是骗他们。
jim
实际上，Visual Studio的新部分是在VS 2005中用.NET编写的，而在VS 2008中则更多的是
。
2007年9月29日消息< uH ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gblCowboy
（Gregory A. Beamer）写道：
>整体而言，.NET在他们的网络应用程序中更多地使用它
它我一直认为它比桌面应用程序更适合Web应用程序，尽管名称可能与此有关。我想知道在即将到来的版本中是否会加强桌面支持吗？
-
Jeff Gaines
.NET总体上更多地用于他们的Web应用程序。
是SQL Server中的一些.NET位，但是它表现不错。您还可以在Office和其他一些应用程序中看到
.NET.
我不确定Symantec AV，Plan Plus或Neat Receipts。我有，但是，b $ b，看到一些用.NET编写的非常好的用户界面。我也不确定你正在看什么的b $ b版本的windows，有多少内存等等。没有
规格，很难将.NET归咎于suckage 。
微软确实在Vista中有一些.NET。他们确实退回了
SQL Server作为文件系统。推，至少现在，你没有看到一个主要的.NET UI片段。
看起来MS似乎不喜欢.NET，但是你必须记住市场上的大多数节目已经处于多年周期，所以
你的陈述在一两年内会更加公平。如果MS仍然没有为他们自己的产品投资.NET，那么这个论点将会更加重要。
-
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP，MCP：+ I，SE，SD，DBA
************* ************************************
|在盒子外面思考！
|
**************************** *********************
" jim" < ji*@home.net写在留言中
新闻：SB ******************* @ bignews4.bellsouth.net。 ..
查看Vista中的Microsoft和Windows应用程序....他们不是.Net。
如果.Net太棒了，为什么MS不再使用它？事实上，微软在.Net中使用什么桌面应用程序？
表现很糟糕。看看赛门铁克的防病毒应用程序和Franklin Covey的
Plan Plus for Windows和Neat Reciepts，你会明白我的意思。
UI性能很糟糕。
我用.Net的第一个版本说它，我坚持它...... .Net <
是微软最大的错误之一，但是他们从来没有（并且看起来好像绝不会）承认或背弃错误 - 就是Windows
我，Vista或.Net。
太糟糕了。人们知道公司会犯错误 - 毕竟公司都是由人经营的。那些不承认错误的公司仍然会成功，他们只是骗他们。
jim
Look at Microsoft and Windows apps in Vista.... They aren''t .Net.
If .Net is so great, why doesn''t MS use it more? In fact, what desktop
applications does Microsoft code in .Net?
I think Microsoft avoids major desktop apps in .Net because the performance
sucks. Look at Symantec''s antivirus apps and Franklin Covey''s Plan Plus for
Windows and Neat Reciepts and you''ll see what I mean. The UI performance
sucks.
I said it with the first release of .Net and I''m sticking to it.... .Net was
one of Microsoft''s biggest mistakes, but they have never (and looks like
will never) admit to or back away from a mistake - be that Windows Me, Vista
or .Net.
Too bad. People know companies make mistakes - after all companies are run
by people. Companies that don''t admit mistakes still make them, they just
lie about them.
jim
"jim" <ji*@home.netwrote in message
news:SB*******************@bignews4.bellsouth.net. ..Look at Microsoft and Windows apps in Vista.... They aren''t .Net.
If .Net is so great, why doesn''t MS use it more? In fact, what desktop
applications does Microsoft code in .Net?
I think Microsoft avoids major desktop apps in .Net because the
performance sucks. Look at Symantec''s antivirus apps and Franklin Covey''s
Plan Plus for Windows and Neat Reciepts and you''ll see what I mean. The
UI performance sucks.
I said it with the first release of .Net and I''m sticking to it.... .Net
was one of Microsoft''s biggest mistakes, but they have never (and looks
like will never) admit to or back away from a mistake - be that Windows
Me, Vista or .Net.
Too bad. People know companies make mistakes - after all companies are
run by people. Companies that don''t admit mistakes still make them, they
just lie about them.
jim
Actually, newer parts of Visual Studio are written in .NET in VS 2005, and
more in VS 2008.
On 29/09/2007 in message <uH**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gblCowboy
(Gregory A. Beamer) wrote:
>.NET, overall, is more used by Microsoft on their web applicationsIt has always seemed to me that it is more suited to web applications than
desktop applications, although the name may have some bearing on that. I
wonder if desktop support will be beefed up in the coming version?
--
Jeff Gaines
..NET, overall, is more used by Microsoft on their web applications. There
are some .NET bits in SQL Server, which performs fine, however. You also see
some .NET in Office and a few other applications.
I am not sure about Symantec AV, Plan Plus or Neat Receipts. I have,
however, seen some very fine UIs written in .NET. I am also not sure what
version of windows you are looking at, how much memory, etc. Without having
specs, it is hard to blame .NET for the suckage.
Microsoft does have some bits in Vista that are .NET. They did back off the
"SQL Server as file system" push, at least for now, and you do not see a
major .NET UI piece.
It would seem like MS is not embracing .NET, but you have to remember most
of the programs that are on the market have been in multiple year cycles, so
your statements will be more fair in a year or two. If MS still does not
invest in .NET for their own product, the argument will bear more weight.
--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
*************************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*************************************************
"jim" <ji*@home.netwrote in message
news:SB*******************@bignews4.bellsouth.net. ..Look at Microsoft and Windows apps in Vista.... They aren''t .Net.
If .Net is so great, why doesn''t MS use it more? In fact, what desktop
applications does Microsoft code in .Net?
I think Microsoft avoids major desktop apps in .Net because the
performance sucks. Look at Symantec''s antivirus apps and Franklin Covey''s
Plan Plus for Windows and Neat Reciepts and you''ll see what I mean. The
UI performance sucks.
I said it with the first release of .Net and I''m sticking to it.... .Net
was one of Microsoft''s biggest mistakes, but they have never (and looks
like will never) admit to or back away from a mistake - be that Windows
Me, Vista or .Net.
Too bad. People know companies make mistakes - after all companies are
run by people. Companies that don''t admit mistakes still make them, they
just lie about them.
jim
这篇关于有人注意到微软不写.Net吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
