不要说AJAX [英] do not say AJAX

问题描述

AJAX是一个愚蠢且令人困惑的词。

人们对程序员多年来使用的东西感到疑惑。

Javascript + Xml和异步请求并不新鲜。在引入XmlHttpRequest之后，人们开始讨论AJAX很多，所以AJAX不能

Javasript + xml + xmlhttprequest。

但是如果你仍然这么认为，你无论如何都称之为AJAX。

xmlhttprequest的新功能是执行同步请求的可能性！ （但是

令人难以置信的AJAX留给Asynchrous + JavaScript + XML）。

所以AJAX真的是一个坏词，不要在这里使用它，我们是程序员不会结束

用户怀疑神话语。

AJAX is a stupid and confusing word.
People is wondering for something that programmers have used for many years.
Javascript + Xml and asynchronous requests is not new. People started to
speak about AJAX a lot after XmlHttpRequest was introduced, so AJAX cant''be
Javasript+xml+xmlhttprequest.
But if you still think so, you can''t anyway call this AJAX. What is new with
xmlhttprequest is the possibility to perform a synchronous request! (but
incredibly AJAX stay for Asynchrous+JavaScript+XML).
So AJAX is really a bad word, don''t use it here, we are programmers not end
users to wonder with mythological words.

推荐答案

ivan写道：

ivan wrote:

AJAX是一个愚蠢而令人困惑的词。人们想知道程序员多年来一直使用的东西。


True。

Javascript + Xml和异步请求不是新的。


请原谅？

在推出XmlHttpRequest后，人们开始大量谈论AJAX，


True。

所以AJAX cant''be Javasript + xml + xmlhttprequest。


恐怕你的逻辑逃脱了我。

但如果你仍然这么认为，你无论如何都称之为AJAX。什么是新的
与xmlhttprequest是执行同步请求的可能性！


您可能意味着xmlhttprequest的新功能是可以执行异步请求！
执行异步请求！ （可能）同步请求总是可以通过AOM / DOM对象和普通的HTML表单来实现
。

（但是非同寻常的AJAX保留了Asynchrous + JavaScript + XML）。


因为那就是新关于它。

所以AJAX真的是一个坏词，不要在这里使用它，我们是程序员而不是最终用户用神话词来思考。

AJAX is a stupid and confusing word. People is wondering for
something that programmers have used for many years.
True.
Javascript + Xml and asynchronous requests is not new.
I beg your pardon?
People started to speak about AJAX a lot after XmlHttpRequest was
introduced,
True.
so AJAX cant''be Javasript+xml+xmlhttprequest.
I am afraid your logic escapes me.
But if you still think so, you can''t anyway call this AJAX. What is new
with xmlhttprequest is the possibility to perform a synchronous request!
You probably meant "What is new with xmlhttprequest is the possibility to
perform an asynchronous request!". (Potentially) synchronous requests have
always been possible through AOM/DOM objects and through normal HTML forms.
(but incredibly AJAX stay for Asynchrous+JavaScript+XML).
Because that is what is "new" about it.
So AJAX is really a bad word, don''t use it here, we are programmers not
end users to wonder with mythological words.

我同意这个术语经常被滥用。但是，

< URL：http：//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX>存在;

AJAX本身并不是一个坏词。

PointedEars

I agree that it is a term often misused. However,
<URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX> exists;
AJAX is not a bad word per se.
PointedEars

>您可能意味着xmlhttprequest的新功能是

> You probably meant "What is new with xmlhttprequest is the possibility to

执行异步请求的可能性！。 （可能）同步请求
总是可以通过AOM / DOM对象和普通HTML
表单。

perform an asynchronous request!". (Potentially) synchronous requests
have
always been possible through AOM/DOM objects and through normal HTML
forms.

No.没有刷新的同步请求。

request.open（" GET"，url，false）; //这是一个带有

xmlhttprequest的同步请求。

No. synchronous request without refresh.
request.open("GET", url, false); //this a synchronous request with
xmlhttprequest.

> AJAX是一个愚蠢而令人困惑的词。


英国的AJAX是一种旧的去污粉产品的名称。


AJAX是_A_syncronous _J_ava _A_nd _X_ML请求。


恐怕像web 2.0一样，这个词就在这里。


Aaron

> AJAX is a stupid and confusing word.

AJAX in England is the name of an old scouring powder product.

AJAX is _A_syncronous _J_ava _A_nd _X_ML request.

I am afraid like web 2.0 the term is here to stay.

Aaron

这篇关于不要说AJAX的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！