arial和卷曲引号的问题 [英] Problem with arial and curly quotes
问题描述
我尝试将字体系列从helvetica更改为arial，并发现
我放弃了印刷报价等（例如，如果我在页面中有
） ，双开引号不卷曲。
尝试arial的原因是我明白它更容易阅读，但我还是找到了helvetica更容易（在这个问题上，什么是
共识，如果有的话？）。
我怀疑arial使用微软的1252代码页，所以没有
制作排版，但笔直。
-
Haines Brown，KB1GRM
I tried changing font-family from helvetica to arial and discovered
that I loose typographic quotes, etc. (for example, if I have “
in a page, the double opening quotation mark is not curly).
The reason for trying arial was that I understood it was easier
reading, although I still find helvetica easier (what is the
consensus, if any, on this issue?).
I suspect that arial uses Microsoft''s 1252 code page and so does not
make “ typographic, but straight.
--
Haines Brown, KB1GRM
推荐答案
2006年11月2日星期四，Haines Brown写道：
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Haines Brown wrote:
I尝试将字体系列从helvetica更改为arial，并发现
，我打印了排版报价等等（例如，如果我在页面中有
，那么双重打开引号不卷曲）。
I tried changing font-family from helvetica to arial and discovered
that I loose typographic quotes, etc. (for example, if I have “
in a page, the double opening quotation mark is not curly).
当字体太小时，它只显示*。
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...mp/quotes.html
It only *seems* so when the font size is too small.
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...mp/quotes.html
Haines Brown写道：
Haines Brown wrote:
>
原因尝试arial是我明白它更容易
阅读，
>
The reason for trying arial was that I understood it was easier
reading,
这是非常主观的。比什么更容易？
-
Berg
That''s highly subjective. Easier than what?
--
Berg
Haines Brown写道：
Haines Brown wrote:
我尝试将字体系列从helvetica更改为arial并发现
我放弃了印刷报价等（对于例如，如果我在页面中有
，则双开引号不是卷曲的。
I tried changing font-family from helvetica to arial and discovered
that I loose typographic quotes, etc. (for example, if I have “
in a page, the double opening quotation mark is not curly).
" curly quotes"历史上有许多数字表示，
见例如
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Quotation_marks_in_English>。
这种方式永远不会使用数字实体对于他们而且只有HTML实体
& lsquo;和& rsquo; （单身）和& ldquo; &安培; rdquo;的（双）
在XSLT模板中，通过它们的Unicode
值在内部DTD子集中定义它们
"curly quotes" historically have a number of numeric representations,
see for instance
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Quotation_marks_in_English>.
This way never use "numeric entities" for them but only HTML entities
‘ and ’ (single) and “ ” (double)
In XSLT templates define them in internal DTD subset by their Unicode
values
尝试arial的原因是我明白它更容易阅读，但我仍然觉得helvetica更容易（如果有的话，这个问题是什么？b
） ？）。
The reason for trying arial was that I understood it was easier
reading, although I still find helvetica easier (what is the
consensus, if any, on this issue?).
你必须要混淆一些东西。对于非Windows平台，Helvetica是传统的后备
字体：
font-family：Arial，Helvetica，sans-serif;
或者（在政治上正确:-)
font-family：Helvetica，Arial，sans-serif;
在Windows平台上，除非另外另外提供Helvetica
已安装
。
You must be confusing something. Helvetica is a traditional fall-back
font for non-Windows platforms:
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
or (to be politically correct :-)
font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
On Windows platforms Helvetica is not presented unless additionally
installed.
这篇关于arial和卷曲引号的问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
