libclc - 来自Boost线程 [英] libclc - from Boost thread
问题描述
几年前，这个新闻组的一些参与者尝试创建一套图书馆工具
但是
它落在了路边。请参阅：
http://libclc.sourceforge.net/
libclc无法生根并不令人惊讶。
极简主义已经成为C的一个特征来自
开始。
---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
这个图书馆的目标是什么？
Marco说：
什么是[libclc]的目标？
最初，它是一套完全可移植的例程，它们是在标准库上构建的。
然后有些人认为添加一些实际上不便宜的东西可以很好，其他人（包括我自己）表示惊讶
并担心comp.lang.c库不可移植，而且那是'br / >
几乎死了。
-
Richard Heathfield
Usenet是一个奇怪的地方 ; - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
电子邮件：rjh在上面的域名（但显然放弃了www）
Richard Heathfieldaécrit：Marco说：
[libclc]的目标是什么？
最初，它的意图是是一套完全可移植的例程，它们建立在标准库的基础上。
然后有些人认为添加一些实际上不便携的东西是很好的，其他一些人（包括我自己）表达了惊喜，并担心comp.lang.c库不可移植，并且在它死亡时几乎就是这样。
嗯这些人想要添加什么东西？
为什么它不是便携式 ????
jacob
jacob navia说：
Richard Heathfield a écrit：Marco说：
[libclc]的目标是什么？
最初，它的目的是建立在标准库上的一套完全可移植的例程。
然后有些人认为添加一些不是<的东西是很好的实际上是便携式的，其他一些人（包括我自己）表达了惊喜，并担心comp.lang.c库不可移植，并且当它死亡时它几乎就是这样。 / blockquote>
嗯这些人想要添加什么？
为什么它不是便携式的？ ???
我不记得了。如果你足够关心，你应该能够在
档案中找到它。
有这么多你可以轻松做到它看起来很傻因为这样一个有价值的项目因为这样的原因而失败了。
-
Richard Heathfield
Usenet是一个奇怪的地方 - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
电子邮件：rjh在上面的域名（但显然放弃了www）
Rouben Rostamian said:
An attempt toward creating a set of library tools was made
by some participants of this newsgroup a few years ago but
it fell by the wayside. See:
http://libclc.sourceforge.net/
The failure of libclc to take root is not surprising.
Minimalism has been a characteristic of C from the very
beginning.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What were the goals of this library?
解决方案Marco said:
What were the goals of [libclc]?
Initially, it was intended to be a set of fully portable routines which
built on the standard library.
Then some people decided it would be neat to add some stuff which wasn''t
actually portable, some other people (myself included) expressed surprise
and concern that a comp.lang.c library would not be portable, and that''s
pretty much when it died.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
Richard Heathfield a écrit :Marco said:What were the goals of [libclc]?
Initially, it was intended to be a set of fully portable routines which
built on the standard library.
Then some people decided it would be neat to add some stuff which wasn''t
actually portable, some other people (myself included) expressed surprise
and concern that a comp.lang.c library would not be portable, and that''s
pretty much when it died.
Mmm what stuff wanted those people to add?
And why wasn''t it "portable" ???
jacob
jacob navia said:
Richard Heathfield a écrit :Marco said:What were the goals of [libclc]?
Initially, it was intended to be a set of fully portable routines which
built on the standard library.
Then some people decided it would be neat to add some stuff which wasn''t
actually portable, some other people (myself included) expressed surprise
and concern that a comp.lang.c library would not be portable, and that''s
pretty much when it died.
Mmm what stuff wanted those people to add?
And why wasn''t it "portable" ???
I don''t remember. If you care enough, you should be able to find it in the
archives.
There''s so much you can do portably that it seems silly for such a
worthwhile project to have foundered for such a reason.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
这篇关于libclc - 来自Boost线程的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
