需要c.l.p.discussion [英] In need of c.l.p.discussion

问题描述

我一直潜伏着c.l.p一段时间了，发现消息的数量很多，有点讨厌。为了解决这个问题，我建议创建新组

" comp.lang.pyhon.discussions"。

所以当人们向clp发布问题时，他们会得到所有（更多或

更少）有帮助的答案在那里，但一旦讨论出现在

问题，人们可以Xfut到clpd这样，有用的知识就不会淹没在主观意见的海洋中。


对此有何评论？


-

-rune

Incognito，ergo sum。

I''ve been lurking c.l.p for a while now, and find the amount of messages
a bit annoying. To solve this, I suggest the creation of the new group
"comp.lang.pyhon.discussions".
So when people post questions to c.l.p, they will get all the (more or
less) helpfull answers there, but as soon as a discussion arise over an
issue, one can Xfut to c.l.p.d. This way, the useful knowledge will not
drown in the ocean of subjective opinions.

Any comments on this?

--
-rune
Incognito, ergo sum.

推荐答案

符文Steffensen< r。********** @ c2i.net>写道：

Rune Steffensen <r.**********@c2i.net> writes:

我一直潜伏着c.l.p一段时间，发现消息量有点烦人。为了解决这个问题，我建议创建新组
comp.lang.pyhon.discussions。
因此，当人们向clp发布问题时，他们将获得所有（更多或
更少）有帮助的答案那里，但一旦讨论出现在
问题，人们可以Xfut到clpd这样，有用的知识就不会淹没在主观意见的海洋中。

对此有何评论？

I''ve been lurking c.l.p for a while now, and find the amount of messages
a bit annoying. To solve this, I suggest the creation of the new group
"comp.lang.pyhon.discussions".
So when people post questions to c.l.p, they will get all the (more or
less) helpfull answers there, but as soon as a discussion arise over an
issue, one can Xfut to c.l.p.d. This way, the useful knowledge will not
drown in the ocean of subjective opinions.

Any comments on this?

缺席实际审核你的方案取决于每张海报决定

他或她的贡献是否构成有用的知识。或者

主观意见。我自信地预测，如果实施的话，

的噪音减少会因噪音增加而被淹没

引发关于特定帖子是否为$ / $
错误分类。


这是一个基于知识的投影。


-

Mark Jackson - http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~mjackson

有两种傻瓜。一个人说，这是旧的，

因此很好。一个人说，这是新的，而且因此更好。因此，b $ b更好。 - Dean William Inge

Absent actual moderation your scheme depends on each poster deciding
whether his or her contribution constitutes "useful knowledge" or
"subjective opinion." I confidently predict that, if implemented, the
noise reduction which results will be swamped by the noise increase
occasioned by arguments over whether a particular posting was
misclassified or not.

And that''s a knowledge-based projection.

--
Mark Jackson - http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~mjackson
There are two kinds of fool. One says, "This is old,
and therefore good." And one says, "This is new, and
therefore better." - Dean William Inge

Rune Steffensen写道：

Rune Steffensen wrote:

对此有何评论？

首先，由于Usenet的无政府主义性质，有可能的方式

这可行。没有动力让人们去做这件事，并且当他们没有时，没有办法强制执行它。我从来没有听说过

现有的新闻组可以按照你描述的方式可靠运行，所以

你正在谈论没有先例的事情。此外，这就是

comp.lang.python是_for_ - 讨论。


其次，请记住comp.lang.python也是封闭的到邮件列表。

除非你把两个都分开到单独的列表中，否则邮件上的人们突然看到讨论消失了。


-

Erik Max Francis&& ma*@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/

__美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞市&& 37 20 N 121 53 W&& & tSftDotIotE

/ \大多数男人都不成熟，他们只是长高了。

\ __ / Leo Rosten

First, due to the anarchic nature of Usenet, there is on possible way
this could work. There''s be no incentive to get people to do this, and
there''d be no way to enforce it when they didn''t. I''ve never heard of
an existing newsgroup that reliably operates the way you describe, so
you''re talking about something without precedent. Besides, that''s what
comp.lang.python is _for_ -- discussion.

Second, remember that comp.lang.python is also gated to a mailing list.
Unless you gate both to separate lists, then the people on the mailing
list suddenly see discussions disappear.

--
Erik Max Francis && ma*@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && &tSftDotIotE
/ \ Most men do not mature, they simply grow taller.
\__/ Leo Rosten

马克杰克逊写道：

如果没有实际审核，你的方案取决于每张海报决定他或她的贡献是否构成有用的知识。或者主观意见。我自信地预测，如果实施的话，噪音的减少会导致噪音增加，而这种噪音的减少是由于关于某个特定帖子是否被错误分类的争论引起的。

Absent actual moderation your scheme depends on each poster deciding
whether his or her contribution constitutes "useful knowledge" or
"subjective opinion." I confidently predict that, if implemented, the
noise reduction which results will be swamped by the noise increase
occasioned by arguments over whether a particular posting was
misclassified or not.

但我们不能使用SpamBayes吗？它可能不需要多少教学，所以任何包含''三元''，''lisp''或

''超载作业'的帖子都会直接发布到clpfistfights。


Daniel

But couldn''t we use SpamBayes for this? It probably wouldn''t require
much teaching so that any post containing ''ternary'', ''lisp'' or
''overloading assignment'' goes straight to c.l.p.fistfights.

Daniel

这篇关于需要c.l.p.discussion的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！