哪个DBMS？ [英] Which DBMS?
问题描述
嗨
我被要求为我们公司的
网络技术人员实施错误记录/管理数据库。我们的想法是，使用
工作站的员工可以进入数据库并记录他们遇到的任何问题，
，而技术人员可以提供故障设备的详细信息。用户
对数据库的经验很少，因此系统需要定制，以允许用户通过简单的gui访问设施。网络
是基于win98的。
目前该公司没有dbms。我最初的反应是使用MS Access来做这个
，因为这是我熟悉的数据库。然而，有了这么多的数据库系统，我想知道其他人会选择什么样的数据，以及它会有什么优势/劣势。
非常感谢您的帮助
Dave
< blockquote> Dave写道：
嗨
我被要求为我们公司的网络技术人员实施错误记录/管理数据库。我们的想法是，使用工作站的员工可以进入数据库并记录他们所遇到的任何问题，而技术人员可以提供故障设备的详细信息。用户几乎没有数据库经验，因此需要定制
系统，以便用户通过简单的gui访问设施。该网络基于win98。
目前该公司没有dbms。我最初的反应是使用MS Access来做它，因为这是一个我熟悉的数据库。
但是，有这么多的数据库系统，我想知道什么是dbms其他人会选择和它有什么优点/不利之处。
非常感谢你的帮助
戴夫
如果用户不熟悉使用数据库并且您不希望在每个工作站上安装应用程序，那么为什么不考虑
运行基于网络的应用程序。
它最大限度地减少了对每个工作站上的前端工作的依赖，
如果工作站有任何情况可能无法工作开发了一个
错误，大多数人都熟悉如何使用网络浏览器。
在我的上一份工作中，只有更复杂的应用程序也是要求用户
能够使用Access的workoffline。其他一切都是基于网络的，并且使用SQL Server和各种脚本语言，b $ b工作得非常好。另一个
选项是更便宜的PHP / MySQL路线。
IMO您的初始规格听起来更适合类似的东西而不是
比Access。然后每个新工作站只需要一个链接到内部网
网站，托管该应用程序，你永远不必担心个人
机器配置。
Quoth" Deano" < ma ************ @ hotmail.com>：在我上一份工作中，只有更复杂的应用程序也要求用户使用
能够使用Access的workoffline。其他一切都是基于网络的，并且使用SQL Server和各种脚本语言很好地工作。另一个
选项是更便宜的PHP / MySQL路由。
为什么你会认为PHP / MySQL更便宜？路线？供应商已经明确表示，如果与它一起使用的软件不是根据GPL许可的
，那么他们希望你支付全价，
495 /主机。 PHP在GPL下是不可用的，无论你使用PHP编写什么代码，或者用b写的可能也不会。
-
如果这有用，< http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r = cbbrowne>给我打分
http://cbbrowne.com/info/rdbms.html
战争是不恰当的比喻; 火焰战争'''用词不当。
在任何usenet交换中，唯一的伤亡就是时间。
有更好的用途后悔。
--thi< tt*@netcom.com>
Hi
I have been asked to implement an error logging/management database for the
network technicians in our company. The idea is that staff using
workstations can enter a database and log any problems they are having,
while the technicians can pull off details of faulty equipment. The users
will have little experience of databases so the system needs to be
customized to allow users access to facilities via simple a gui. The network
is win98 based.
Currently the company does not have a dbms. My initial reaction is to do it
using MS Access as this is a database that I am familiar with. However, with
so many databases systems out there, I was wondering what dbms others would
choose and what advantages/disadvantes it would have.
Many thanks for the help
Dave
Dave wrote:Hi
I have been asked to implement an error logging/management database
for the network technicians in our company. The idea is that staff
using workstations can enter a database and log any problems they are
having, while the technicians can pull off details of faulty
equipment. The users will have little experience of databases so the
system needs to be customized to allow users access to facilities via
simple a gui. The network is win98 based.
Currently the company does not have a dbms. My initial reaction is to
do it using MS Access as this is a database that I am familiar with.
However, with so many databases systems out there, I was wondering
what dbms others would choose and what advantages/disadvantes it
would have.
Many thanks for the help
Dave
If the users aren''t that familar with using databases and you don''t want the
trials of installing an app onto each workstation then why not consider
running a web-based app.
It minimises the reliance on having a front-end working on each workstation,
which may not be working in any case if the workstation has developed a
fault, and most people are familiar with how to use a web-browser.
In my last job, only the more complex apps that also required the user to be
able to workoffline used Access. Mostly everything else was web-based and
worked quite well using SQL Server and various scripting languages. Another
option is the cheaper PHP/MySQL route.
IMO your initial spec sounds better suited for something like that rather
than Access. Then each new workstation simply needs a link to the intranet
site that hosts the app and you never have to worry about the individual
machine configuration.
Quoth "Deano" <ma************@hotmail.com>:In my last job, only the more complex apps that also required the user to be
able to workoffline used Access. Mostly everything else was web-based and
worked quite well using SQL Server and various scripting languages. Another
option is the cheaper PHP/MySQL route.
Why would you consider PHP/MySQL a "cheaper" route? The vendor has
pretty clearly stated that if the software being used with it isn''t
licensed under the GPL, then they expect you to pay full price,
495/host. PHP isn''t available under the GPL, and whatever code you
write in PHP probably won''t be, either.
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://cbbrowne.com/info/rdbms.html
"war is an inappropriate analogy; ``flame war'''' is a misnomer.
in any usenet exchange, the only casualty is time.
there are better uses for regret."
--thi <tt*@netcom.com>
这篇关于哪个DBMS？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
