C ++标准和版权 [英] The C++ std and copyright
问题描述
这不是关于C ++ std的问题，而是一个
" metaquestion"在C ++ std。
C ++ ISO标准版有一个版权声明，说这个
出版物的任何部分都不得以任何形式复制，包括电子
检索系统，未经ITI事先书面许可。
这究竟是什么意思？例如。假设我正在写一本关于C ++的书。
在我的书中，我显然只会解释那些符合
标准的东西（我不能发明东西并在下面标记它们） C ++的名字）。所以
这是否意味着我需要事先获得ITI的许可才能写完这样的书？
怎么样？在期刊上写一些文章（比如c ++ - style-casts）？
在博客上？
可能在我的书中我将使用不同的大多数地方的措辞
避免任何侵犯版权的行为。但对于基本定义等，我将
必须使用标准中的确切措辞。此外，在某些
处，标准提供了非常好的示例（代码）来演示。
我不能在我的文章中使用这段代码来解释某些概念/想法？
-Neelesh
This is not exactly a question on C++ std, rather it is a
"metaquestion" on C++ std.
The C++ ISO std has a copyright notice saying that "No part of this
publication may be reproduced in any form, including an electronic
retrieval system, without the prior written permission of ITI."
What does this exactly mean? Eg. Suppose I am writing a book on C++.
In my book, I will obviously explain only those things that are in the
standard (I cant invent things and tag them under the name of C++). So
does that mean I need to take a prior permission from the ITI before
writing any such book?
What about writing some article (say on c++-style-casts) in a journal?
on a blog?
May be in my book I will use a different wording at most places to
avoid any copyright violation. But for basic definitions etc, I will
have to use the exact wording from the standard. Also, at certain
places the standard gives very nice examples (code) to demonstrate.
Can''t I use this code in my writeups to explain certain concept/idea?
-Neelesh
推荐答案
Neelesh Bodas写道：
Neelesh Bodas wrote:
这不是一个关于C ++ std的问题，而是一个
" metaquestion"在C ++ std。
C ++ ISO标准版有一个版权声明，说这个
出版物的任何部分都不得以任何形式复制，包括电子
检索系统，未经ITI事先书面许可。
这究竟是什么意思？例如。假设我正在写一本关于C ++的书。
在我的书中，我显然只会解释那些符合
标准的东西（我不能发明东西并在下面标记它们） C ++的名字）。那么
这是否意味着我需要事先获得ITI的许可才能写出任何这样的书？
This is not exactly a question on C++ std, rather it is a
"metaquestion" on C++ std.
The C++ ISO std has a copyright notice saying that "No part of this
publication may be reproduced in any form, including an electronic
retrieval system, without the prior written permission of ITI."
What does this exactly mean? Eg. Suppose I am writing a book on C++.
In my book, I will obviously explain only those things that are in the
standard (I cant invent things and tag them under the name of C++). So
does that mean I need to take a prior permission from the ITI before
writing any such book?
我相信你（你的出版商或他们的律师）需要熟悉
的合理使用概念。应用它。
I believe you (your publisher or their lawyers) need to get familiar
with the concept of "fair use" and apply it.
如何在日记中写一些文章（比如c ++ - style-casts）？
What about writing some article (say on c++-style-casts) in a journal?
期刊有一个出版商，他们有律师，问他们。
The journal has a publisher, they have lawyers, ask them.
博客上的
？
on a blog?
Blog？请查阅ISP的用户协议及其行为准则。
Blog? Consult the ISP''s user agreement and their rules of conduct.
可能在我的书中我会在大多数地方使用不同的措辞来
避免任何侵犯版权的行为。但对于基本定义等，我将
必须使用标准中的确切措辞。此外，在某些
处，标准提供了非常好的示例（代码）来演示。
我不能在我的文章中使用这段代码来解释某些概念/想法？
May be in my book I will use a different wording at most places to
avoid any copyright violation. But for basic definitions etc, I will
have to use the exact wording from the standard. Also, at certain
places the standard gives very nice examples (code) to demonstrate.
Can''t I use this code in my writeups to explain certain concept/idea?
我们一直引用标准中的段落。只要您承认版权或至少
不要试图将其作为您自己的写作传递，那么这一切都会在合理使用下falls
。 br />
V
-
请在通过电子邮件回复时删除资金''A'
我没有回复最热门的回复，请不要问
We quote passages from the Standard all the time here. It all falls
under "fair use", as long as you acknowledge the copyright or at least
don''t try to pass it as your own writing.
V
--
Please remove capital ''A''s when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don''t ask
7月10日，晚上10点52分，Victor Bazarov < v.Abaza ... @ comAcast.netwrote：
On Jul 10, 10:52 pm, "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abaza...@comAcast.netwrote:
>
我相信你（你的出版商或他们的律师）需要用合理使用的概念来熟悉
应用它。
>
I believe you (your publisher or their lawyers) need to get familiar
with the concept of "fair use" and apply it.
谢谢。
Thanks.
" ; Neelesh Bodas < ne *********** @ gmail.com写信息
新闻：11 ******************* **@x35g2000prf.googlegro ups.com ...
"Neelesh Bodas" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@x35g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
这不是一个关于C ++ std的问题，而是一个
" metaquestion"在C ++ std。
C ++ ISO标准版有一个版权声明，说这个
出版物的任何部分都不得以任何形式复制，包括电子
检索系统，未经ITI事先书面许可。
这究竟是什么意思？例如。假设我正在写一本关于C ++的书。
在我的书中，我显然只会解释那些符合
标准的东西（我不能发明东西并在下面标记它们） C ++的名字）。所以
这是否意味着我需要事先获得ITI的许可才能写完这样的书？
怎么样？在期刊上写一些文章（比如c ++ - style-casts）？
在博客上？
可能在我的书中我将使用不同的大多数地方的措辞
避免任何侵犯版权的行为。但对于基本定义等，我将
必须使用标准中的确切措辞。此外，在某些
处，标准提供了非常好的示例（代码）来演示。
我不能在我的文章中使用这段代码来解释某些概念/想法？
-Neelesh
This is not exactly a question on C++ std, rather it is a
"metaquestion" on C++ std.
The C++ ISO std has a copyright notice saying that "No part of this
publication may be reproduced in any form, including an electronic
retrieval system, without the prior written permission of ITI."
What does this exactly mean? Eg. Suppose I am writing a book on C++.
In my book, I will obviously explain only those things that are in the
standard (I cant invent things and tag them under the name of C++). So
does that mean I need to take a prior permission from the ITI before
writing any such book?
What about writing some article (say on c++-style-casts) in a journal?
on a blog?
May be in my book I will use a different wording at most places to
avoid any copyright violation. But for basic definitions etc, I will
have to use the exact wording from the standard. Also, at certain
places the standard gives very nice examples (code) to demonstrate.
Can''t I use this code in my writeups to explain certain concept/idea?
-Neelesh
有些东西不能受版权保护。
例如电话簿。虽然电话簿的风格可以是受版权保护的，但数据却不能。因此，为什么你现在看到这么多电话簿
天。
虽然提出标准的方式受到保护，但是推出了
标准你自己的方式不是。
There are certain things that cannot be copyrighted.
For example a phone book. While the style of the phone book can be
copyrighted, the data cannot. Hence why you see so many phone books now
days.
While the way the presented the standard is protected, putting out the
standards in your own way is not.
这篇关于C ++标准和版权的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
