亚马逊获得订购HTML表格的专利;最小化和最大化 [英] Amazon wins patent for ordering HTML forms; Minimizing and Maximizing

问题描述

NEWS.COM


亚马逊获得订购表格专利

＃6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com/2100-1017-5070569.html


在其最新专利中，在线零售业巨头概述了一种方法，用于扩展订购单的部分，然后折叠

表格的那一部分并删除数据字段。然后将再次显示该特定部分的内容

。

该专利于1997年9月提交，其中包含美国专利和商标

Office，还描述了一种在订单上编辑内容的方法，并且根据一份副本，在b / b
的更改后，再次显示该部分中的信息。专利。


这种最小化和最大化是否受到威胁？如果说两个窗口是指向同一个应用程序的
.....


或者使用旧的Windows 3.1打开打印窗口怎么样？


那个网络公司很久以前用树视图怎么样？
资源管理器......是不是在扩展和崩溃？

解决方案

像树视图这样的东西可能不适用。专利的目的是什么？
是表格，而不是打印窗户。最小化和最大化不是受到威胁的b $ b。他们获得专利的是这样一个概念：如果你有一个带有多个部分的表格

并且在一个部分中选择一个表格字段将会导致另一个部分的扩展（例如选中发送到

a不同地址的方框将导致打开一个部分，其中包含

所需的字段（不同的送货地址）。声明还明确声明

这必须是一个HTML文档，因此遗漏了许多其他的b $ b应用程序。你必须真正筛选其中的个人声明

得到一个足够好的感觉，它是多么严格，并有近40个声称我b / B $ 10睡着了。关键项目是多个（多个）部分

表格以HTML格式呈现，其中一次只能激活一个部分

一个数据字段的选择其他部分。


希望这会有所帮助，

Mark Fitzpatrick

Microsoft MVP - FrontPage

" nospam" < [e-mail]>在消息中写道

news：ef ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl ...

NEWS.COM

亚马逊获得订购表格专利
＃6,615,226 http：// tinyurl。 com / m7v8
http：// news .com.com / 2100-1017-5070569.html

在其最新专利中，在线零售巨头概述了一种方法，用于扩展部分订购单，然后折叠
的那部分表单并删除数据字段。然后将再次显示该表格特定部分的内容。
1997年9月向美国专利商标局提交的专利也描述了一种编辑内容的方法。根据专利副本，订单表格和
在更改后的部分重新显示信息。

这种最小化和最大化是否受到威胁？如果有两个窗口指向同一个应用程序.....

或者使用旧的Windows 3.1打开打印窗口怎么样？

那个网络公司很久以前的树视图探险家......那不是在扩张和崩溃吗？

< blockquote>你没有正确阅读专利。


你只需要看看索赔＃1 ......它没有提到HTML。索赔

＃6使用索赔＃1，但索赔＃1不需要索赔＃6 .....

-------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------------

---

1.一种在客户端系统显示表单的方法，该方法包括：


提供描述表格的文件，表格有多个

部分，每个部分都有描述性信息和多个

数据输入字段;


显示每个部分的描述性信息;


以响应用户选择描述性信息一节，

通过显示与

相关的数据输入字段来扩展该节;并且当用户指示折叠展开的部分时，
，通过删除显示的数据输入字段并重新显示
$ b来折叠

部分$ b该部分的描述性信息。

---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

---


所以索赔＃1，可以意味着Windows或任何形式的实际上......哎呀什么是

FORM..any window用文本框......


" Mark Fitzpatrick" <毫安****** @ fitzme.com>在消息中写道

新闻：OY ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl ...

像树视图这样的事情可能不适用。专利指导的是b $ b，表格是什么，而不是打印窗户。最小化和最大化不受威胁。他们获得专利的是这样一个概念：如果你有一个带有多个部分的表格，并且在一个部分中选择一个表格字段，那么
将导致另一个部分的扩展（例如选中一个框为将
运送到不同的地址将导致部分打开，其中所需的字段为
，用于不同的送货地址）。声明还明确指出，这必须是一个HTML文档，因此遗漏了许多其他应用程序。你必须真正筛选出它的个人索赔
以获得足够好的感觉它有多严格，并且有近40个索赔
我在10上睡着了。关键项目虽然是多个（多个部分
以HTML格式呈现的表单，其中一个部分一次可以通过选择其他部分中的数据字段来激活。

希望这有助于，
Mark Fitzpatrick
微软MVP - FrontPage

  nospam" < [e-mail]>在消息中写道
新闻：ef ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl ...

NEWS.COM
＃6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com /2100-1017-5070569.html

在其最新专利中，在线零售巨头概述了一种方法，用于扩展部分订购单，然后折叠部分

表单并删除数据字段。然后，表格中特定
部分的内容将再次显示。
1997年9月向美国专利商标局提交的专利也描述了一种编辑内容的方法。根据专利副本，订单形成
并在更改完成后重新显示该部分中的信息。

这种最小化和最大化是否受到威胁？如果说两个窗口
指向相同的应用程序.....

或者使用旧的Windows 3.1打开打印窗口怎么样？

那个网络公司很久以前的树视图探险家......那不是在扩张和崩溃吗？

阅读更多......看看索赔＃10 .....


________________________________________

10。用于编辑字段的计算机系统中的方法，包括：显示字段内容的
;


接收选择的字段的内容显示;


响应收到选择，在

中显示编辑窗口，其中编辑所选字段的内容;编辑字段内容后，
，删除显示的编辑页面，并显示包含已编辑内容的所选字段。

_________________________________________


听起来就像编辑数据网格.......


哦，好吧，我想微软是将停止使用Datagrid / DataSet进行
编辑。

＃6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8


" Mark Fitzpatrick" <毫安****** @ fitzme.com>在消息中写道

新闻：OY ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl ...

像树视图这样的事情可能不适用。专利指导的是b $ b，表格是什么，而不是打印窗户。最小化和最大化不受威胁。他们获得专利的是这样一个概念：如果你有一个带有多个部分的表格，并且在一个部分中选择一个表格字段，那么
将导致另一个部分的扩展（例如选中一个框为将
运送到不同的地址将导致部分打开，其中所需的字段为
，用于不同的送货地址）。声明还明确指出，这必须是一个HTML文档，因此遗漏了许多其他应用程序。你必须真正筛选出它的个人索赔
以获得足够好的感觉它有多严格，并且有近40个索赔
我在10上睡着了。关键项目虽然是多个（多个部分
以HTML格式呈现的表单，其中一个部分一次可以通过选择其他部分中的数据字段来激活。

希望这有助于，
Mark Fitzpatrick
微软MVP - FrontPage

  nospam" < [e-mail]>在消息中写道
新闻：ef ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl ...

NEWS.COM
＃6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com /2100-1017-5070569.html

在其最新专利中，在线零售巨头概述了一种方法，用于扩展部分订购单，然后折叠部分

表单并删除数据字段。然后，表格中特定
部分的内容将再次显示。
1997年9月向美国专利商标局提交的专利也描述了一种编辑内容的方法。根据专利副本，订单形成
并在更改完成后重新显示该部分中的信息。

这种最小化和最大化是否受到威胁？如果说两个窗口
指向相同的应用程序.....

或者使用旧的Windows 3.1打开打印窗口怎么样？

那个网络公司很久以前的树视图探险家......那不是在扩张和崩溃吗？

NEWS.COM

Amazon wins patent for ordering forms
# 6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com/2100-1017-5070569.html

In its latest patent, the online retailing giant outlined a method for
expanding portions of the ordering form, then collapsing that portion of the
form and removing the data fields. The content for that particular section
of the form would then be displayed again.
The patent, filed in September 1997 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, also described a method for editing content on the order form and
redisplaying the information in the section after the changes have been
made, according to a copy of the patent.

Does this minimize and maximize is threatened? As say if two windows are
pointing to the same application.....

Or what about opening up the Printing Window using the old Windows 3.1?

What about that networking company of long ago with the tree view
explorer...wasn''t that expanding and collapsing?

解决方案

Things like a treeview probably don''t apply. What the patents is directed at
is forms, not things like printing windows. Minimize and maximize is not
threatened. What they have patented is the concept that if you have a form
with multiple sections and the selection of a form field in one section will
cause the expansion of another section (such as checking a box for "ship to
a different address" will cause a section to open with the fields needed for
the different shipping address). The claims also specifically state that
this must be an HTML document so that leaves out a lot of other
applications. You have to really sift through the individual claims in it to
get a good enough feel of how restrictive it is, and with almost 40 claims I
fell asleep on 10. The key items though are a plurality (multiple) section
form rendered in HTML where a single section at a time can be activated by
the selection of a data field in one of the other sections.

Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage

"nospam" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:ef**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

NEWS.COM

Amazon wins patent for ordering forms
# 6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com/2100-1017-5070569.html

In its latest patent, the online retailing giant outlined a method for
expanding portions of the ordering form, then collapsing that portion of the form and removing the data fields. The content for that particular section
of the form would then be displayed again.
The patent, filed in September 1997 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, also described a method for editing content on the order form and
redisplaying the information in the section after the changes have been
made, according to a copy of the patent.

Does this minimize and maximize is threatened? As say if two windows are
pointing to the same application.....

Or what about opening up the Printing Window using the old Windows 3.1?

What about that networking company of long ago with the tree view
explorer...wasn''t that expanding and collapsing?

You are not reading the patent correctly.

You only need to look at Claim #1...It mentions nothing about HTML. Claim
#6 uses Claim #1, but Claim #1 doesn''t need Claim #6 whatsoever.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
1. A method for displaying a form at a client system, the method comprising:

providing a document describing the form, the form having a plurality of
sections, each section having descriptive information and a plurality of
data entry fields;

displaying the descriptive information for each section;

in response to a user selecting descriptive information of a section,
expanding that section by displaying the data entry fields associated with
that section; and

when the user indicates to collapse the expanded section, collapsing that
section by removing the displayed data entry field and redisplaying the
descriptive information for that section.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

So CLAIM #1, can mean Windows OR any FORM practically.....heck what''s a
FORM..any window with a Textbox......

"Mark Fitzpatrick" <ma******@fitzme.com> wrote in message
news:OY**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Things like a treeview probably don''t apply. What the patents is directed at is forms, not things like printing windows. Minimize and maximize is not
threatened. What they have patented is the concept that if you have a form
with multiple sections and the selection of a form field in one section will cause the expansion of another section (such as checking a box for "ship to a different address" will cause a section to open with the fields needed for the different shipping address). The claims also specifically state that
this must be an HTML document so that leaves out a lot of other
applications. You have to really sift through the individual claims in it to get a good enough feel of how restrictive it is, and with almost 40 claims I fell asleep on 10. The key items though are a plurality (multiple) section
form rendered in HTML where a single section at a time can be activated by
the selection of a data field in one of the other sections.

Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage

"nospam" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:ef**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

NEWS.COM

Amazon wins patent for ordering forms
# 6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com/2100-1017-5070569.html

In its latest patent, the online retailing giant outlined a method for
expanding portions of the ordering form, then collapsing that portion of

the

form and removing the data fields. The content for that particular section of the form would then be displayed again.
The patent, filed in September 1997 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, also described a method for editing content on the order form and redisplaying the information in the section after the changes have been
made, according to a copy of the patent.

Does this minimize and maximize is threatened? As say if two windows are pointing to the same application.....

Or what about opening up the Printing Window using the old Windows 3.1?

What about that networking company of long ago with the tree view
explorer...wasn''t that expanding and collapsing?

Reading more.....LOOK at claim #10.....

________________________________________
10. A method in a computer system for editing fields comprising:

displaying the content of the fields;

receiving a selection of a field whose content is displayed;

in response to receiving the selection, displaying an editing window in
which the content of the selected field is edited; and

after the content of the field is edited, removing the displayed editing
window and displaying the selected field with the edited content.
_________________________________________

That sounds just like editing a datagrid.......

Oh, well, I guess Microsoft is going to stop using the Datagrid/DataSet for
editing.
# 6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8

"Mark Fitzpatrick" <ma******@fitzme.com> wrote in message
news:OY**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Things like a treeview probably don''t apply. What the patents is directed at is forms, not things like printing windows. Minimize and maximize is not
threatened. What they have patented is the concept that if you have a form
with multiple sections and the selection of a form field in one section will cause the expansion of another section (such as checking a box for "ship to a different address" will cause a section to open with the fields needed for the different shipping address). The claims also specifically state that
this must be an HTML document so that leaves out a lot of other
applications. You have to really sift through the individual claims in it to get a good enough feel of how restrictive it is, and with almost 40 claims I fell asleep on 10. The key items though are a plurality (multiple) section
form rendered in HTML where a single section at a time can be activated by
the selection of a data field in one of the other sections.

Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage

"nospam" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:ef**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

NEWS.COM

Amazon wins patent for ordering forms
# 6,615,226 http://tinyurl.com/m7v8
http://news.com.com/2100-1017-5070569.html

In its latest patent, the online retailing giant outlined a method for
expanding portions of the ordering form, then collapsing that portion of

the

form and removing the data fields. The content for that particular section of the form would then be displayed again.
The patent, filed in September 1997 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, also described a method for editing content on the order form and redisplaying the information in the section after the changes have been
made, according to a copy of the patent.

Does this minimize and maximize is threatened? As say if two windows are pointing to the same application.....

Or what about opening up the Printing Window using the old Windows 3.1?

What about that networking company of long ago with the tree view
explorer...wasn''t that expanding and collapsing?

这篇关于亚马逊获得订购HTML表格的专利;最小化和最大化的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！