又一个挑剔的风格问题 [英] Yet another nitpicky style question
问题描述
您更喜欢* my_string还是my_string [0]？为什么？
-
Christopher Benson-Manica |我*应该*知道我在说什么 - 如果我
ataru（at）cyberspace.org |不，我需要知道。火焰欢迎。
Do you prefer *my_string or my_string[0]? Why?
--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I''m talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don''t, I need to know. Flames welcome.
推荐答案
" Christopher Benson-Manica" <在*** @ nospam.cyberspace.org>在消息中写道
news：c0 ********** @ chessie.cirr.com ...
"Christopher Benson-Manica" <at***@nospam.cyberspace.org> wrote in message
news:c0**********@chessie.cirr.com...
你更喜欢* my_string还是my_string [0 ]？为什么？
Do you prefer *my_string or my_string[0]? Why?
取决于。 somestruct-> charptr [0]比
*（somestruct-> charptr）更容易阅读我觉得...
但是
* charptr ++ ='''';
更清洁
charptr [0] = ''一个''; ++ charptr;
Tom
depends. somestruct->charptr[0] is easier to read than
*(somestruct->charptr) I think...
But
*charptr++ = ''a'';
Is cleaner than
charptr[0] = ''a''; ++charptr;
Tom
" Tom St Denis" < to*@securescience.net>在消息中写道
news：qZ ************** @ news01.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com ...
"Tom St Denis" <to*@securescience.net> wrote in message
news:qZ**************@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com...
Christopher Benson-Manica <在*** @ nospam.cyberspace.org>在消息中写道
新闻：c0 ********** @ chessie.cirr.com ...
"Christopher Benson-Manica" <at***@nospam.cyberspace.org> wrote in message
news:c0**********@chessie.cirr.com...
你更喜欢* my_string还是my_string [0]？为什么？
Do you prefer *my_string or my_string[0]? Why?
取决于。 somestruct-> charptr [0]比
*（somestruct-> charptr）更容易阅读我认为...
depends. somestruct->charptr[0] is easier to read than
*(somestruct->charptr) I think...
注意：[之前任何人都明智]我通常把（）放在我的会员身边
引用只是为了明确意图。
Tom
Note: [before anyone gets wise] I normally put () around my member
references just to make the intent clear.
Tom
Tom St Denis< to*@securescience.net>写道：
Tom St Denis <to*@securescience.net> wrote:
" Tom St Denis" < to*@securescience.net>在消息中写道
新闻：qZ ************** @ news01.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com ...
"Tom St Denis" <to*@securescience.net> wrote in message
news:qZ**************@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com...
取决于。 somestruct-> charptr [0]比
*（somestruct-> charptr）更容易阅读我认为...
depends. somestruct->charptr[0] is easier to read than
*(somestruct->charptr) I think...
注意：[之前任何人都明智了]我通常把（）围绕我的成员
引用只是为了使意图明确。
Note: [before anyone gets wise] I normally put () around my member
references just to make the intent clear.
我假设那么'' - >''绑定比''''更紧密？
-
Harrison Caudill | 。^ www.hypersphere.org
计算机科学&物理双专业| |我*我= 1
佐治亚理工学院| v''我只是一个普通人
I''m assuming then that the ''->'' binds more tightly than the ''*''?
--
Harrison Caudill | .^ www.hypersphere.org
Computer Science & Physics Double Major | | Me*Me=1
Georgia Institute of Technology | v'' I''m just a normal guy
这篇关于又一个挑剔的风格问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
