使wxPython成为标准模块？ [英] Making wxPython a standard module?
问题描述
Hi Diez&全部，
并且在个人说明中：我发现它*非常*。
你介意解释为什么你发现它*但是*？显然，出于好奇，我只是问
。我对wxPython非常偏向于，我特意不会对这个帖子做任何评论，但我很好奇
知道为什么有些人会发现它难看"或坏管他呢。当然，它有自己的错误和缺少的功能，但它是竞技场中的一个主要GUI播放器之一，还有PyQt和PyGTK。
Andrea。
想象力是反对现实的战争中的唯一武器。
http://xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/
6月12日，9：55 * am，Andrea Gavana < andrea.gav ... @ gmail.comwrote：
Hi Diez&全部，
并且在个人说明中：我发现它*非常*。
你介意解释为什么你发现它*但是*？显然，出于好奇，我只是问
。我对wxPython非常偏向于，我特意不会对这个帖子做任何评论，但我很好奇
知道为什么有些人会发现它难看"或坏管他呢。当然，它有自己的错误和缺少的功能，但它是竞技场中的一个主要GUI播放器之一，还有PyQt和PyGTK。
Andrea。
想象力是反对现实的战争中唯一的武器。http：//xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/
我也很好奇。我喜欢wxPython，因为小部件实际上以跨平台的方式（大部分）以b $ b的方式查看
因为他们使用实际的小部件集操作系统Tkinter绘制了所有内容，并且在Windows上看起来有些奇怪，虽然我已经看到了一些使用它的非常漂亮的程序。
当然，wx并没有真正做到剥皮，所以在这方面它可能会比其他一些工具包更加受到阻碍Andrea
提到。我真的不知道。
-------------------
Mike Driscoll
博客： http://blog.pythonlibrary.org
Python扩展构建网络： http://www.pythonlibrary.org
在文章< ma ************************** ***********@python.or g>，
" Andrea Gavana" < a *********** @ gmail.comwrote：
嗨Diez&全部，
并且在个人说明中：我发现它*非常*。
你介意解释为什么你发现它*但是*？
我的猜测是buttugly是一种俗语
意思是精致可爱。
>我只是要求
out of好奇，显然。我对wxPython非常偏向于，我特意不会对这个帖子做任何评论，但我很好奇
知道为什么有些人会发现它难看"或坏管他呢。当然，它有自己的错误和缺少的功能，但它是竞技场中的一个主要GUI播放器之一，还有PyQt和PyGTK。
Andrea。
想象力是反对现实的战争中的唯一武器。
http://xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/
- -
David C. Ullrich
Andrea Gavana schrieb：
Hi Diez &安培;全部，
>并且就个人而言：我发现它*只是*。
你介意解释为什么你发现它*但是*？显然，出于好奇，我只是问
。我对wxPython非常偏向于，我特意不会对这个帖子做任何评论，但我很好奇
知道为什么有些人会发现它难看"或坏管他呢。当然，它有自己的错误和缺少的功能，但它是竞技场中的主要GUI玩家之一，还有PyQt和PyGTK。
对于好奇：不是外观&感觉（虽然我更喜欢Linux上的KDE而不是
Gnome，这是一个Qt / GTK的东西因此影响wx外观和感觉），
但代码和放大器;设计师。我被Qt和Apple宠坏了
界面生成器我想。
但正如我所说：那是个人意见，而我'我非常清楚Qt（许可和费用）的限制，当然还有IB（仅限OSX）
Diez
Hi Diez & All,
And on a personal note: I find it *buttugly*.
Do you mind explaining "why" you find it *buttugly*? I am asking just
out of curiosity, obviously. I am so biased towards wxPython that I
won''t make any comment on this thread in particular, but I am curious
to know why some people find it "ugly" or "bad" or whatever. It has
its own bugs and missing features, of course, but it is one of the
major GUI player in the arena, together with PyQt and PyGTK.
Andrea.
"Imagination Is The Only Weapon In The War Against Reality."
http://xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/
On Jun 12, 9:55*am, "Andrea Gavana" <andrea.gav...@gmail.comwrote:Hi Diez & All,
And on a personal note: I find it *buttugly*.
Do you mind explaining "why" you find it *buttugly*? I am asking just
out of curiosity, obviously. I am so biased towards wxPython that I
won''t make any comment on this thread in particular, but I am curious
to know why some people find it "ugly" or "bad" or whatever. It has
its own bugs and missing features, of course, but it is one of the
major GUI player in the arena, together with PyQt and PyGTK.
Andrea.
"Imagination Is The Only Weapon In The War Against Reality."http://xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/
I''m curious too. I like wxPython because the widgets actually "look"
the way they should in a cross-platform way (for the most part)
because they use the actual widgets sets of the OS. Tkinter draws
everything and can look kind of weird on Windows, although I have seen
some very nice looking programs that use it.
Of course, wx doesn''t really do "skinning", so in that respect it may
be hampered more than some of the other toolkits that Andrea
mentioned. I really don''t know.
-------------------
Mike Driscoll
Blog: http://blog.pythonlibrary.org
Python Extension Building Network: http://www.pythonlibrary.org
In article <ma*************************************@python.or g>,
"Andrea Gavana" <an***********@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Diez & All,
And on a personal note: I find it *buttugly*.
Do you mind explaining "why" you find it *buttugly*?My guess would be that "buttugly" is a colloquialism
meaning "exquisitely lovely".
>I am asking just
out of curiosity, obviously. I am so biased towards wxPython that I
won''t make any comment on this thread in particular, but I am curious
to know why some people find it "ugly" or "bad" or whatever. It has
its own bugs and missing features, of course, but it is one of the
major GUI player in the arena, together with PyQt and PyGTK.
Andrea.
"Imagination Is The Only Weapon In The War Against Reality."
http://xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/--
David C. Ullrich
Andrea Gavana schrieb:Hi Diez & All,
>And on a personal note: I find it *buttugly*.
Do you mind explaining "why" you find it *buttugly*? I am asking just
out of curiosity, obviously. I am so biased towards wxPython that I
won''t make any comment on this thread in particular, but I am curious
to know why some people find it "ugly" or "bad" or whatever. It has
its own bugs and missing features, of course, but it is one of the
major GUI player in the arena, together with PyQt and PyGTK.For the curious: Not the look & feel (albeit I prefer KDE on linux over
Gnome, which is a Qt/GTK thing and thus affects wx look & feel as well),
but the code & the designers. I''ve been spoiled by Qt and Apple
Interface Builder I guess.
But as I said: that''s a personal opinion, and I''m well aware of the
limitations of Qt (licensing and costs) and of course IB (OSX only)
Diez
这篇关于使wxPython成为标准模块？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
