基于浏览器还是Access前端? [英] Browser-based or Access front end?

查看:330
本文介绍了基于浏览器还是Access前端?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述




我为一家真正的
房地产公司管理和开发基于Access 2003 / SQL 2000的系统。这是相当广泛的,并且具有Windows / Office

集成的水平。


我的问题是:放弃访问的利弊是什么在

支持基于网络的前端?


谢谢,


Simon Lane

Hi,

I manage and develop an Access 2003/SQL 2000 based system for a real
estate company. It''s quite extensive and has a level of Windows/Office
integration.

My question is this: what are the pros and cons of ditching Access in
favour of a web based front end?

Thanks,

Simon Lane

推荐答案

sm*****@hotmail.com 写道:


我为一家真正的房地产公司管理和开发基于Access 2003 / SQL 2000的系统。它非常广泛,并且具有一定程度的Windows / Office
集成。

我的问题是:放弃Access的优点和缺点是什么?基于网络的前端?

谢谢,

Simon Lane
Hi,

I manage and develop an Access 2003/SQL 2000 based system for a real
estate company. It''s quite extensive and has a level of Windows/Office
integration.

My question is this: what are the pros and cons of ditching Access in
favour of a web based front end?

Thanks,

Simon Lane




如果您的用户需要能够使用它在公司局域网之外,然后基于网络的前端是有用的。如果没有,你正在花费大量的工作来支付
基本上为了成品而重新设计前端

你的用户不会那么喜欢。大多数情况下,你的Windows / Office集成将会消耗掉b $ b。


-

我不检查电子邮件帐户附上

到此消息。发送给...

在Hunter dot com的RBrandt



If your users need to be able to use it outside your company LAN then a
web-based front end is useful. If not, you are expending a LOT of work to
basically design the front end all over again for a finished product that
your users will not like as much. Plus your Windows/Office integration will
for the most part be gone.

--
I don''t check the Email account attached
to this message. Send instead to...
RBrandt at Hunter dot com


2005年1月11日04:27:49 -0800, sm ***** @ hotmail.com 写道:


你有什么利弊来到目前为止?

你为什么要考虑采取行动?


-Tom。

On 11 Jan 2005 04:27:49 -0800, sm*****@hotmail.com wrote:

What pros and cons have you come up with so far?
Why are you considering making this move?

-Tom.


我为一家真正的房地产公司管理和开发基于Access 2003 / SQL 2000的系统。它非常广泛,并且具有一定程度的Windows / Office
集成。

我的问题是:放弃Access的优点和缺点是什么?基于网络的前端?

谢谢,

Simon Lane
Hi,

I manage and develop an Access 2003/SQL 2000 based system for a real
estate company. It''s quite extensive and has a level of Windows/Office
integration.

My question is this: what are the pros and cons of ditching Access in
favour of a web based front end?

Thanks,

Simon Lane






你会发现基于浏览器的前端能够更快地查询您的数据

更快

因为服务器没有Microsoft Office的开销。此外,您可以从任何地方访问

您的数据。如果你知道如何编写ASP / HTML,你还可以更好地控制

数据的输出,




缺点,很多工作,安全,学习曲线陡峭。


< sm ***** @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道

news:20 ************************** @ posting.google.c om ...
You will find that a browser based front end is able to query your data much
faster
as the server does not have the overhead of Microsoft Office. Also, you can
access
your data from anywhere. You also have more control over the output of your
data,
if you know how to write ASP/HTML.

Cons, lots of work, security, learning curve is steep.

<sm*****@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:20**************************@posting.google.c om...


我为一家真正的房地产公司管理和开发基于Access 2003 / SQL 2000的系统。它非常广泛,并且具有一定程度的Windows / Office
集成。

我的问题是:放弃Access的优点和缺点是什么?基于网络的前端?

谢谢,

Simon Lane
Hi,

I manage and develop an Access 2003/SQL 2000 based system for a real
estate company. It''s quite extensive and has a level of Windows/Office
integration.

My question is this: what are the pros and cons of ditching Access in
favour of a web based front end?

Thanks,

Simon Lane



这篇关于基于浏览器还是Access前端?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆