SQL2000和Yukon的未来许可 [英] Future Licensing for SQL2000 and Yukon
问题描述
一旦Yukon发布（无论何时可能），MS的任何人都有关于Yukon和SQL 2000许可的任何
评论。
我真的不认为任何拥有SQL 2000许可证的人会升级
，因为数据库管理员甚至开发人员都会说服
管理它是值得的成本，无论SQL服务器是否可以执行C＃或VB.NET
存储过程。
这是因为性能太差而且Oracle已经存储了Java />
多年的触发和他们的dba'或开发者'的几乎zippo
无论如何都转移到了它。无论未来的架构需求是什么，SQL都很容易学习和开始使用。期间
微软必须有一个更好的许可政策，
将以极低的使用MySql的成本解决并更好地竞争。
很难说服一个非常小的企业或者开始花费一个SQL Server 2000处理器许可证和所有相关的
只需构建一个带有数据库后端的内部Web服务器就可以获得
的成本
硬件说1000美元和软件，只需许可，成本至少
double硬件成本增加了三倍。
MS花了很多时间试图攻击Oracle和DB2，并花费更少的时间来追踪妈妈和流行音乐和新手用户世界卫生组织最终将在未来使用的数据库中做主，如果他们一旦成长，将成为下一个eBay。
。
SQL服务器MSDE版本和所有其他许可证从未被提及
给妈妈和流行或学生或企业家，因为他们不能在
生产环境中使用....
*****
如果微软想要，他们甚至可以通过替代许可计划进一步限制SQL Server的功能或生产价格，这将使得b / b
升级为更容易和更好，更满意的客户使用
存储过程和一个良好的数据库架构，而不是从一个db
到另一个的风险端口...... br />
****
关键是微软需要解决内部或共同定位的
网络服务器提供DSL和有线服务的互联网服务提供商
调制解调器让互联网接入更加实惠，想要托管他们的东西
内部....那么，那些知道的人绝对可以并且想要做到这一点肯定是
更多的知识，更专注于真正成为下一个eBay。
任何人真的会相信他们的新生意不顺利
很容易在一些ISP的SQL Server上托管它。
不是每个企业都会成为eBay ......但是他们仍然是商业
无论如何，为什么不迎合他们并让他们成为最好的。
现在最好看看PHP和MySQL或者微软对MySql的问题与Linux一样只会有很大的问题。
MSDE是一个完全许可的失败，因为ZERO PEOPLE使用它任何事情，
甚至开发。
微软最好学会迎合群众，否则群众会把他们的生意带到某个地方其他。由于CPU只会变快，所以让它们切换将是一场艰难的b / b
艰苦的战斗。
1000和软件，只需许可，至少花费
硬件成本的两倍或三倍。
MS正在花费大量时间来反对Oracle和DB2，并且在妈妈和流行音乐以及新手用户最终将会花费b
$ b如果一旦他们成长，就会在未来使用的数据库中做主。
并成为下一个eBay。
SQL服务器MSDE版本和所有那些其他许可证从未被提及给妈妈和流行音乐或学生或企业家，因为它们不能在
生产环境中使用....
*****
如果微软想要，他们甚至可以进一步限制SQL Server的功能或生产价格替代许可计划，这将使
升级更容易和更好，更满意的客户使用
存储过程和良好的数据库架构而不是来自一个数据库的风险端口
到另一个......
****
重点是微软需要解决内部或合作问题位于
网络服务器，而不是提供DSL和线缆服务的ISP
调制解调器让互联网访问更加实惠，想要托管他们的东西
内部....那些知道并且可以并且想要这样做的人肯定是
更加知识，更专注于实际成为下一个eBay。
任何真正相信他们新业务的人都不会在某些ISP的SQL Server上主持它。
不是每个企业都是如此将成为一个eBay ...但他们仍然是商业
无论如何，所以为什么不迎合他们并让他们成为最好的。
PHP和我的最好现在看一下SQL，或者微软只会像使用Linux那样使用MySql一个很大的问题。
MSDE是一个完整的许可证失败，因为ZERO PEOPLE使用它做任何事情，
甚至开发。
微软最好学会迎合群众或群众采取的措施
他们的业务在其他地方。由于CPU只会变快，所以让它们切换将是一场艰难的b / b
艰苦的战斗。
我是一个，我们在一个实例上有两个处理器许可证，在另一个实例上有一个10个
的座位许可证。我等不及育空了！它会摇滚。
" nospam" < n@ntspam.com>在消息中写道
news：ud ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl ...一旦Yukon被释放（什么时候可能是这样的？来自MS的任何人都有
对Yukon和SQL 2000许可的任何评论。
我真的不认为任何拥有SQL 2000许可证的人都会升级<因为数据库管理员甚至开发人员都会说服管理它是值得的，无论SQL服务器能做C＃还是
VB.NET存储过程。
<这是因为性能非常糟糕，Oracle已经存储了多年的Java存储过程，而且他们的dba或开发人员的zippo无论如何都已经转移到了它。无论未来的架构需求如何，SQL都很容易学习和开始使用。期间
微软必须有一个更好的许可政策，
将以更低的使用MySql成本解决并更好地竞争。
它'很难说服一个非常小的企业或开始花费一个SQL Server 2000处理器许可证和所有相关的成本，只需构建一个内部的Web服务器与数据库后端
当硬件说
1000和软件，只需许可，成本至少是硬件成本的两倍或三倍。
来减少妈妈和流行音乐以及新手用户WHO最终会在使用的数据库中做出决定未来，如果他们的
增长并成为下一个eBay。
SQL服务器MSDE版本和所有其他许可证永远不会提到妈妈和流行音乐或学生的
或企业家他们不能在
a生产环境中使用....
如果微软想要，他们甚至可以进一步限制电力或$ b带有替代授权计划的SQL Server的$ b生产版本，这将使得更容易升级，以及使用
a存储过程和良好的数据库架构而不是风险端口的THUS，更满意的客户一个
db到另一个....
****
关键是微软需要解决内部或共同定位的网络服务器而不是那些提供DSL服务和有线电视调制解调器服务的互联网服务提供商可以让互联网访问更加实惠，希望能够在内部托管他们的东西.......那些知道并且可以并且想要这样做的人
绝对是更加知识渊博，更加专注于真正成为下一个eBay。
任何真正相信他们的新业务的人都不是b $ b b很容易在某些ISP上主持它SQL Server。
不是每个企业都会这样做o成为一个eBay ......但他们仍然是无数的商业
所以为什么不迎合他们并让他们成为最好的。
PHP和MySQL最好被关注现在或者微软只会像使用Linux那样只有一个
的MySql问题。
MSDE是一个完全许可的失败，因为ZERO PEOPLE使用它做任何事情，甚至开发。
微软最好学会迎合群众，或群众将把他们的业务带到其他地方。由于CPU只会变快，所以让它们切换是一场艰苦的战斗。
Once Yukon is released (whenever that might be) does anyone from MS have any
comment on licensing for Yukon and on SQL 2000.
I really don''t think anyone with SQL 2000 licenses are going to upgrade
because the database admin or even the developer is going to convince
management it''s worth the cost regardless if SQL server can do C# or VB.NET
stored procedures.
This is because the performance is terrible and Oracle has had Java stored
procs for years and practically zippo of their dba''s or developer''s have
moved to it anyway. SQL is EASY to learn and get started with, regardless
of future architecture needs. PERIOD
There has really got to be a better licensing policy from Microsoft that
will address and compete better with the very low costs of using MySql.
It''s going to be very hard to convince a very very small business or start
up to spend for a SQL Server 2000 processor license and all the associated
cost with just building an in-house web server with a database backend when
the hardware at say $1000 and software, just licensing, costs at least
double or triple the cost of hardware.
MS is spending a lot of time trying to go against Oracle and DB2 and a less
time going after the mom and pop and the novice user WHO will eventually
call the shots in what database is used in the future if and once they grow
and become the next eBay.
The SQL server MSDE version and all those other licenses are never mentioned
to the mom and pop or the student or entrepreneur as they can''t be used on a
production environment....
*****
If Microsoft wants, they could even further limit the power or a production
verion of SQL Server with an alternative licensing plan, this will make
upgrading a LOT easier and THUS, MORE satisified customers that are using a
stored procs and a good db architecture instead of a risky port from one db
to another....
****
The point is Microsoft needs to address the in-house or co-located
web-server instead of the ISP who offers their service as DSL and cable
modems make internet access more affordable wanting to host their stuff
in-house....THUS, those who know and can and want to do this are definitely
MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE, MORE DEDICATED to actually becoming the next eBay.
Anyone who is REALLY is going to believe in their new business is NOT going
readily host it on some ISP''s SQL Server.
Not every business is going to be an eBay...BUT they are STILL BUSINESSES
anyway so why not cater to them and get them to be the best they can be.
PHP and MySQL had better be looked at now or Microsoft will have just a big
of a problem with MySql as they do with Linux.
MSDE is a COMPLETE LICENSING FAILURE as ZERO PEOPLE USE IT for anything,
even development.
Microsoft had better learn to cater to the masses or the masses will take
their business somewhere else. And getting them to switch is going to be an
uphill battle as CPU are only going to get faster.
解决方案1000 and software, just licensing, costs at least
double or triple the cost of hardware.
MS is spending a lot of time trying to go against Oracle and DB2 and a less
time going after the mom and pop and the novice user WHO will eventually
call the shots in what database is used in the future if and once they grow
and become the next eBay.
The SQL server MSDE version and all those other licenses are never mentioned
to the mom and pop or the student or entrepreneur as they can''t be used on a
production environment....
*****
If Microsoft wants, they could even further limit the power or a production
verion of SQL Server with an alternative licensing plan, this will make
upgrading a LOT easier and THUS, MORE satisified customers that are using a
stored procs and a good db architecture instead of a risky port from one db
to another....
****
The point is Microsoft needs to address the in-house or co-located
web-server instead of the ISP who offers their service as DSL and cable
modems make internet access more affordable wanting to host their stuff
in-house....THUS, those who know and can and want to do this are definitely
MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE, MORE DEDICATED to actually becoming the next eBay.
Anyone who is REALLY is going to believe in their new business is NOT going
readily host it on some ISP''s SQL Server.
Not every business is going to be an eBay...BUT they are STILL BUSINESSES
anyway so why not cater to them and get them to be the best they can be.
PHP and MySQL had better be looked at now or Microsoft will have just a big
of a problem with MySql as they do with Linux.
MSDE is a COMPLETE LICENSING FAILURE as ZERO PEOPLE USE IT for anything,
even development.
Microsoft had better learn to cater to the masses or the masses will take
their business somewhere else. And getting them to switch is going to be an
uphill battle as CPU are only going to get faster.
I am for one, and we have two processor licenses on one instance, and a ten
seat license at another. I can not wait for Yukon! It''s going to rock.
"nospam" <n@ntspam.com> wrote in message
news:ud**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...Once Yukon is released (whenever that might be) does anyone from MS have any comment on licensing for Yukon and on SQL 2000.
I really don''t think anyone with SQL 2000 licenses are going to upgrade
because the database admin or even the developer is going to convince
management it''s worth the cost regardless if SQL server can do C# or VB.NET stored procedures.
This is because the performance is terrible and Oracle has had Java stored
procs for years and practically zippo of their dba''s or developer''s have
moved to it anyway. SQL is EASY to learn and get started with, regardless
of future architecture needs. PERIOD
There has really got to be a better licensing policy from Microsoft that
will address and compete better with the very low costs of using MySql.
It''s going to be very hard to convince a very very small business or start
up to spend for a SQL Server 2000 processor license and all the associated
cost with just building an in-house web server with a database backend when the hardware at say
1000 and software, just licensing, costs at least
double or triple the cost of hardware.
MS is spending a lot of time trying to go against Oracle and DB2 and a less time going after the mom and pop and the novice user WHO will eventually
call the shots in what database is used in the future if and once they grow and become the next eBay.
The SQL server MSDE version and all those other licenses are never mentioned to the mom and pop or the student or entrepreneur as they can''t be used on a production environment....
*****
If Microsoft wants, they could even further limit the power or a production verion of SQL Server with an alternative licensing plan, this will make
upgrading a LOT easier and THUS, MORE satisified customers that are using a stored procs and a good db architecture instead of a risky port from one db to another....
****
The point is Microsoft needs to address the in-house or co-located
web-server instead of the ISP who offers their service as DSL and cable
modems make internet access more affordable wanting to host their stuff
in-house....THUS, those who know and can and want to do this are definitely MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE, MORE DEDICATED to actually becoming the next eBay.
Anyone who is REALLY is going to believe in their new business is NOT going readily host it on some ISP''s SQL Server.
Not every business is going to be an eBay...BUT they are STILL BUSINESSES
anyway so why not cater to them and get them to be the best they can be.
PHP and MySQL had better be looked at now or Microsoft will have just a big of a problem with MySql as they do with Linux.
MSDE is a COMPLETE LICENSING FAILURE as ZERO PEOPLE USE IT for anything,
even development.
Microsoft had better learn to cater to the masses or the masses will take
their business somewhere else. And getting them to switch is going to be an uphill battle as CPU are only going to get faster.
这篇关于SQL2000和Yukon的未来许可的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
