C 99 - C ++ 2003差异 [英] C 99 -- C++ 2003 diffs

问题描述

任何人都可以总结ANSI / ISO C ++ 2003标准*未采用的ANSI / ISO C 99标准

的[新]功能吗？

或请指出这样的总结。

Can anybody summarize the [new] features of ANSI/ISO C 99 standard
that were *not* adopted by the ANSI/ISO C++ 2003 standard?
Or point me to such a summary.

推荐答案

" E. Robert Tisdale <，E ************** @ jpl.nasa.gov>。在留言中写道

news：3F ************** @ jpl.nasa.gov ...

"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:3F**************@jpl.nasa.gov...

任何人都可以总结一下[新的] ANSI / ISO C 99标准的特性是否被ANSI / ISO C ++ 2003标准采用？
或者指出这样的总结。

Can anybody summarize the [new] features of ANSI/ISO C 99 standard
that were *not* adopted by the ANSI/ISO C++ 2003 standard?
Or point me to such a summary.

哪里可以找到C ++ 2003标准的摘要？

Where to find a summary of the C++2003 standard?

*这样说起E. Robert Tisdale< E. **** **********@jpl.nasa.gov>：


你好，

* Thus spoke E. Robert Tisdale <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov>:

Hallo,

任何人都可以总结一下[new ANSI / ISO C ++标准*未采用的ANSI / ISO C 99标准的特征？
或者请指出这样的总结。

Can anybody summarize the [new] features of ANSI/ISO C 99 standard
that were *not* adopted by the ANSI/ISO C++ 2003 standard?
Or point me to such a summary.

哪个世界已经存在ANSI / ISO C ++ 2003标准？


- < http://david.tribble.com/text/cdiffs.htm>


[f''up2 - > clc ++]


沃尔夫冈。

-

" Es gibt Dinge，死于男人bereut，男人sie tut。 Und man tut sie doch。

- Christian Friedrich Hebbel

In which world exists an ANSI/ISO C++ 2003 standard already?

- <http://david.tribble.com/text/cdiffs.htm>

[ f''up2 -> clc++ ]

Wolfgang.
--
"Es gibt Dinge, die man bereut, ehe man sie tut. Und man tut sie doch."
-- Christian Friedrich Hebbel

2003年12月13日星期六19:42:16 -0800， &引用。 Robert Tisdale <，E ************** @ jpl.nasa.gov>。写道：

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:42:16 -0800, "E. Robert Tisdale" <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

任何人都可以总结一下ANSI / ISO C ++ 2003标准未采用的ANSI / ISO C 99标准的[新]特性吗？或者指出我这样的总结。

Can anybody summarize the [new] features of ANSI/ISO C 99 standard
that were *not* adopted by the ANSI/ISO C++ 2003 standard?
Or point me to such a summary.

http://www.research.att.com/~ark/c++.../revisions.pdf
http：//www.acceleratedcpp.com/author ... /revisions.pdf


不完全是你要求的，因为只列出了修订版。


只挑选两个当前版本来自[comp.lang.c ++。moderated]的线程：

C ++ 2003中删除的一个特性是

& a [i]之间的旧等价数组元素的a + i刚刚超过数组的末尾。

那只是愚蠢，恕我直言。


C ++ 2003中添加的一项功能是保证当你写''新T'而不是''新T（）''时，对于零的初始化

T的POD元素。


那样。

http://www.research.att.com/~ark/c++.../revisions.pdf
http://www.acceleratedcpp.com/author.../revisions.pdf

Not exactly what you ask for, since just the revisions are listed.

Picking just two current threads from [comp.lang.c++.moderated]:

One feature removed in C++ 2003 is the old equivalence between
&a[i] and a+i for the array element just past the end of an array.
That''s just silly, IMHO.

A feature added in C++ 2003 is guaranteed zero-initialization of
POD elements of T when you write ''new T'' instead of ''new T()''.

Things like that.

这篇关于C 99 - C ++ 2003差异的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！