如何安装源安全 [英] How to install source safe

查看:48
本文介绍了如何安装源安全的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在Visual Studio 6(2001)中使用了Source safe但是在.net 2008

安装后,似乎没有任何标志

的任何源安全。这是不是继续下去了。如果不是如何设置

这一切。

Desmond。

I used Source safe in Visual Studio 6 (2001) However in .net 2008
after installing it there seems to be no sign
of any source safe. Has this been dis-continued. If not how do I set
it all up.
Desmond.

推荐答案

On 5月2日上午9:09,Desmond< otuat ... @ aol.comwrote:
On May 2, 9:09 am, Desmond <otuat...@aol.comwrote:

我在Visual Studio 6(2001)中使用了Source safe但是在。 net 2008

安装后,似乎没有任何标志

的任何来源安全。这是不是继续下去了。如果不是我如何设置

一切。
I used Source safe in Visual Studio 6 (2001) However in .net 2008
after installing it there seems to be no sign
of any source safe. Has this been dis-continued. If not how do I set
it all up.



它还没有停产,但除非你绝对*有*使用

它,我会推荐一个不同的源控制系统。就个人而言,我很喜欢Subversion,它在我的

视图中是免费的,并且比VSS更好*。话虽如此,我相信自从我上次使用它后,VSS已经有所改善。尽管如此,它还是必须得到超越认可的提升才能比Subversion更好......


Jon

It''s not been discontinued, but unless you absolutely *have* to use
it, I''d recommend a different source control system. Personally I
really like Subversion, which is free and *much* nicer than VSS in my
view. Having said that, I believe that VSS has improved since I last
used it. It would have to have improved beyond recognition to be
better than Subversion though...

Jon


Jon Skeet [C#MVP]写道:
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:

5月2日上午9:09,Desmond< otuat ... @ aol.comwrote:
On May 2, 9:09 am, Desmond <otuat...@aol.comwrote:

>我在Visual Studio 6(2001)中使用了Source safe但是在.net 2008
安装之后似乎没有任何迹象
任何来源安全。这是不是继续下去了。如果不是如何设置
全部。
>I used Source safe in Visual Studio 6 (2001) However in .net 2008
after installing it there seems to be no sign
of any source safe. Has this been dis-continued. If not how do I set
it all up.



它还没有停产,但除非你绝对*有*使用

它,我会推荐一个不同的源控制系统。就个人而言,我很喜欢Subversion,它在我的

视图中是免费的,并且比VSS更好*。话虽如此,我相信自从我上次使用它后,VSS已经有所改善。它必须得到超越认可才能比Subversion更好......但是... b $ b Jon


It''s not been discontinued, but unless you absolutely *have* to use
it, I''d recommend a different source control system. Personally I
really like Subversion, which is free and *much* nicer than VSS in my
view. Having said that, I believe that VSS has improved since I last
used it. It would have to have improved beyond recognition to be
better than Subversion though...

Jon



不幸的是,Source Safe并没有改善到应有的程度,

和安全这个词。在它的名字现在更像是一个用词不当的东西

其他。


我认真,我不能强调这一点,认真地告诉人们不要
将Source Safe用于任何事情。


由于文件损坏,我看到丢失的文件和目录,并且

不是一天都要去没有sourcesafe再次抱怨

一个没有成功完成的操作,*之后发生了

这个事实。


即使你必须手动跟踪postit笔记的修改,也要确保

不考虑Source Safe。


有各种免费选项,如乔恩指出,Subversion非常好b $ b好​​。如果你把它与相对便宜的VisualSVN插件相结合,那么你需要为自己提供一个非常好的平台。


-

Lasse V?gs?ther Karlsen

mailto:la *** @ vkarlsen.no
http://presentationmode.blogspot.com/

PGP KeyID:0xBCDEA2E3

Unfortunately, Source Safe hasn''t improved to the extent it should have,
and the word "Safe" in its name is now more of a misnomer than anything
else.

I seriously, and I cannot stress this enough, seriously tell people not
to use Source Safe for anything.

I have seen lost files and directories due to file corruption, and
theres not a day going by without sourcesafe complains once more about
an operation that did not complete successfully, *after* the fact that
it happened.

Even if you have to manually keep track of revisions on postit notes, do
not consider Source Safe.

There are various free options, and as Jon point out, Subversion is very
good. If you couple this with the relatively cheap VisualSVN addin for
Visual Studio you''ve got yourself a really good platform going forward.

--
Lasse V?gs?ther Karlsen
mailto:la***@vkarlsen.no
http://presentationmode.blogspot.com/
PGP KeyID: 0xBCDEA2E3


5月2日凌晨4:39,Jon Skeet [C#MVP] < sk ... @ pobox.comwrote:
On May 2, 4:39 am, "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk...@pobox.comwrote:

它还没有停止,但除非你绝对*有*使用

it,我会推荐一个不同的源控制系统。就个人而言,我很喜欢Subversion,它在我的

视图中是免费的,并且比VSS更好*。话虽如此,我相信自从我上次使用它后,VSS已经有所改善。它必须得到超越认可的提升,比Subversion更好......
It''s not been discontinued, but unless you absolutely *have* to use
it, I''d recommend a different source control system. Personally I
really like Subversion, which is free and *much* nicer than VSS in my
view. Having said that, I believe that VSS has improved since I last
used it. It would have to have improved beyond recognition to be
better than Subversion though...



VSS改进是新图形和网络你可以通过互联网工作的服务。除此之外,没有任何改变,并且

它像以前一样不可靠。


我喜欢SourceGear的保险柜。它不是免费的(除非你只需要一个

用户),它被设计成VSS的替代品,因此以相同的方式工作在很多

,它存储它' MS Sql server中的数据,我更喜欢使用文件系统的
。我不知道SVN是怎么做到的,但是我觉得

它适用于FS,可能是也可能不是交易的,我不会
知道SVN是否或如何只处理部分变更

承诺。

VSS improvements are new graphics, and a web service over which you
can work through the internet. Beyond that, nothing has changed, and
it''s as unreliable as ever.

I like SourceGear''s Vault. Its not free (unless you only need one
user), is designed to be a replacement for VSS and so works in much
the same way, and it stores it''s data in MS Sql server, which I prefer
over using the file system. I don''t know how SVN does it, but I think
it works on the FS, which may or may not be transactional, and I don''t
know if or how SVN would handle only part of the changes being
committed.


这篇关于如何安装源安全的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆