'<？'与'<？php' [英] '<?' versus '<?php'

问题描述

大家好，


我最近遇到了拒绝这个成语的PHP5安装，<？ //代码？

并且实际上在发送到浏览器的输出中呈现。

Yikes！


系统管理员无法说明原因，但建议它是PHP5

的事情。


所以我的问题是：<？php将成为必需品吗？如果它是
，我们将不允许用简写回显<？php = $ foo？因为我们

曾经<？= $ bar ??因为那也被打破了。


感谢您的任何建议，


JG

解决方案

FOO？因为我们

习惯了<？=

吧？因为它也被打破了。


感谢您的任何建议，


JG

jerrygarciuh写道：

大家好，


我最近遇到了拒绝这个成语的PHP5安装，<？ //代码？

>并且实际上在发送到浏览器的输出中呈现。

Yikes！


系统管理员无法说明原因，但建议它是PHP5

的事情。


所以我的问题是：<？php将成为必需品吗？如果它是
，我们将不允许用简写回显<？php =

Hi folks,

I recently ran into a PHP5 install that rejects the idiom, <? // code ?

and in fact renders that in the output that is sent to the browser.

Yikes!

The sysadmins could not say why this was but suggested it was a PHP5
thing.

So my question to you: is <?php going to become required? And if it
is will we not be allowed to echo by the shorthand <?php=$foo? as we
used to <?=$bar?? As that was broken too.

Thanks for any advice,

JG

解决方案

foo? as we
used to <?=

bar?? As that was broken too.

Thanks for any advice,

JG

jerrygarciuh wrote:

Hi folks,

I recently ran into a PHP5 install that rejects the idiom, <? // code ?

>and in fact renders that in the output that is sent to the browser.

Yikes!

The sysadmins could not say why this was but suggested it was a PHP5
thing.

So my question to you: is <?php going to become required? And if it
is will we not be allowed to echo by the shorthand <?php=

这篇关于'&lt;？'与'&lt;？php'的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！