PRIORITY_LOW_POWER VS PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY为谷歌游戏服务V2 [英] PRIORITY_LOW_POWER vs PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY for google play service v2

问题描述

我想知道的融合位置，做上述任何使用GPS + wifi网络的结合在一起呢？什么是供应商方面的差异（没有任何它使用了GPS）？从我的文档中看到所不同的只是距离

I'm wondering for the fused location, does any of the above use a combination of gps + wifi network together? what is the difference in terms of provider (does any of it uses the gps)? from what i see in the documentation the difference is only distance

我有previously曾与LocationManager和使用NETWORK_PROVIDER和GPS_PROVIDER合力得到的这两个供应商的组合。

I've previously worked with LocationManager and used NETWORK_PROVIDER and GPS_PROVIDER together to get a combination of those two provider.

推荐答案

新的融合位置提供商采取了略微不同的方法相比，previous方法。现在，开发人员选择多少电量来计算，而不是它的设备组件被用于计算它的位置。它使用任何可用的GPS和Wi-Fi，移动网络和车载传感器的组合来计算位置。

The new fused location providers take a slightly different approach compared to previous methods. Developers now choose how much battery power is used to calculate a location instead of which device components are used to calculate it. It uses any available combination of GPS, Wi-Fi, mobile networks, and onboard sensors to calculate the location.

在 LocationRequest 优先级设置现在：

• PRIORITY_NO_POWER （被动侦听来自其他客户端位置更新）
• PRIORITY_LOW_POWER （〜10公里城市精度）
• PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY （〜百米块的准确度）
• PRIORITY_HIGH_ACCURACY （准确地在电池寿命为代价）

• PRIORITY_NO_POWER (passively listens for location updates from other clients)
• PRIORITY_LOW_POWER (~10km "city" accuracy)
• PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY (~100m "block" accuracy)
• PRIORITY_HIGH_ACCURACY (accurate as possible at the expense of battery life)

谷歌介绍了 LocationRequest 类在这里：<一href="http://developer.android.com/reference/com/google/android/gms/location/LocationRequest.html">http://developer.android.com/reference/com/google/android/gms/location/LocationRequest.html

这篇关于PRIORITY_LOW_POWER VS PRIORITY_BALANCED_POWER_ACCURACY为谷歌游戏服务V2的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！