有人还没有升级到97吗？ [英] Anyone still not upgrading from 97?
问题描述
回过头来讨论，有很多关于2000比GH
慢于97的讨论，但最近并没有那么多。什么是最新意见？
任何人都在关注有多少NG成员仍在使用
97？ 2000？
我有点想要一个新客户升级，其数据是在2000年，
当然，我可以把它全部通过Excel ...对吗？
我想我已经看到了几个不错的功能......
仍然有多少变化呢我要编写代码？有没有人有一个
参考转换代码（声明记录集等）
哎呀，我刚注意到我现在可以转换回97.为什么我的b $ b从来不知道呢？
pe *********** @ aol.com 写在
新闻：11 ********************** @ g14g2000cwa.googlegr psps.com：
检查讨论情况，有很多人谈论2000年比97慢，但最近并没有那么多。什么是最新的
意见？
任何人都在关注有多少NG成员使用97进行民意调查？ 2000？
我没有升级，但我的一个客户从Access97升级到A2K，而
是因为互操作性（他们需要添加一个人
谁只有A2K）。
我有点想要一个新客户升级，其数据在2000年，但当然，我可以把它全部送回去通过Excel Excel ...对吗？
A2K可以保存为A97。
我想我已经看到了几个不错的功能......
，我需要对代码进行多少更改？有没有人有转换代码的参考（声明记录集等）。
对于A2K的客户，我几乎总是在A97中开发并转换为
生产使用。我遇到了一些不起眼的而且不是因为这个问题引起的非常重要的问题。
现在，几乎我所有的新开发都是A2K几乎没有任何人在运行A2K以外的任何东西。我有一个主要的
项目，它在A2K3下运行（在Windows终端服务器下）
某些用户为
，其他用户为A2K。到目前为止没有问题。
-
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
< a href =mailto：pe *********** @ aol.com> pe *********** @ aol.com 写在
news：11 ********************* @ o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com：
哎呀，我现在注意到我可以转换回97.如何来，我从来不知道这个？
可能是因为它是Access的第一个版本曾经提供
a向后转换。
-
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
Checking back for discussions, there was a lot of talk about 2000 being
slower than 97, but not so much lately. What is the latest opinion?
Anyone care to set up a poll for how many NG members are still using
97? 2000?
I am slightly tempted to upgrade by a new client whose data is in 2000,
but of course, I can just port it all back through Excel...right?
and I guess I have seen a couple of nice features...
still, how many changes do I have to make to code? Does anyone have a
reference for converting code (declaring recordsets etc.)
Whoops, I just noticed now that I can convert back to 97. How come I
never knew that?
pe***********@aol.com wrote in
news:11**********************@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com:
Checking back for discussions, there was a lot of talk about 2000
being slower than 97, but not so much lately. What is the latest
opinion?
Anyone care to set up a poll for how many NG members are still
using 97? 2000?
I have not upgraded but one of my clients from Access97 to A2K, and
that was because of interoperatbility (they needed to add a person
who had only A2K).
I am slightly tempted to upgrade by a new client whose data is in
2000, but of course, I can just port it all back through
Excel...right?
A2K can save it as A97.
and I guess I have seen a couple of nice features...
still, how many changes do I have to make to code? Does anyone
have a reference for converting code (declaring recordsets etc.)
For clients with A2K, I almost always develop in A97 and convert for
production use. I have run into only a handful of obscure and not
very important problems caused by that.
Right now, almost all of my new development is A2K with hardly
anyone running on anything beyond A2K itself. I do have one major
project that''s running under A2K3 (under Windows Terminal Server)
for some users and under A2K for others. No problems so far.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
pe***********@aol.com wrote in
news:11*********************@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com:
Whoops, I just noticed now that I can convert back to 97. How
come I never knew that?
Possibly because it''s the first version of Access that ever offered
a backwards conversion.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
这篇关于有人还没有升级到97吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
