访问死了吗？ [英] Is Access Dead?
问题描述
由于SQL Server无处不在，Access死于缓慢死亡？是
访问FoxPro的方式，注定是
桌面数据库中的最后一个？
我绝对不能给你一个答案，但我也想知道
答案。
我能做的一件事尽管如此，即使它已经死了，它仍然可能非常有用（而且价格更便宜）。
就像Dos今天没什么价值，但是仍然是一个非常强大的工具。
我主要对前端感兴趣。很容易做出一个好的后端，
困难的部分是制作一个好的前端。大多数新概念似乎都使用了
HMTL类型的前端，这对于兼容性而言非常好，而且在快速高效的编程方面也非常无用（仅限于b $ b）我是b $ b了解它。
---
如果（a）这封电子邮件，请立即告知我们（通过电话或回复电子邮件）
包含病毒
（b）您不是预定的收件人
（c）您认为此电子邮件是垃圾邮件。
我们已尽最大努力确保
以上都不适用。谢谢
由AVG反病毒系统检查（ http：// www .grisoft.com）。
版本：6.0.693 /病毒库：454 - 发布日期：31/05/2004
< blockquote> tb******@mightyware.com （Todd Bandrowsky）在
$ b $中写道b新闻：d4 ************************* @ posting.google.co m：
自SQL Server无处不在，Access死了慢死？
访问是FoxPro的方式，注定是最后的桌面数据库？
No.
-
Lyle
（电子邮件参考 http://ffdba.com/ ）
tb ****** @ mightyware.com （Todd Bandrowsky）写道：
由于SQL Server无处不在，Access死得很慢死亡？是否可以访问FoxPro，注定是最后一个桌面数据库？
访问不会死亡或死亡。 MS很乐意开发下一个版本的Access。
程序管理员偶尔会在microsoft.public.access中被发现。*
新闻组询问人们想要什么功能。
此外，Access非常适合作为SQL Server的前端。
Tony
-
Tony Toews，Microsoft Access MVP
请仅在新闻组中回复，以便其他人可以阅读整个消息主页。$ br >
Microsoft Access Links，Hints，Tips&会计系统
http://www.granite.ab.ca /accsmstr.htm
Since SQL Server is everywhere, is Access dying a slow death? Is
Access going the way of the FoxPro, destined to be the last of the
desktop databases?
I definitely can not give you an answer for that, but I also like to know
the answer.
One thing i can say though is that even if it is dead it may still be very
useful (and defnitely cheaper).
Just like Dos is worth nothing today, but still really a powerful tool.
I am mainly interested in the front end. It is easy to make a good back-end,
the hard part is making a good front-end. Most new concepts seem to use
HMTL type front-ends, which is great for compatability, but also very
useless when it comes to fast and efficient programming (as far as I
understand it).
---
Please immediately let us know (by phone or return email) if (a) this email
contains a virus
(b) you are not the intended recipient
(c) you consider this email to be spam.
We have done our utmost to make sure that
none of the above are applicable. THANK YOU
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.693 / Virus Database: 454 - Release Date: 31/05/2004
tb******@mightyware.com (Todd Bandrowsky) wrote in
news:d4*************************@posting.google.co m:
Since SQL Server is everywhere, is Access dying a slow death? Is
Access going the way of the FoxPro, destined to be the last of the
desktop databases?
No.
--
Lyle
(for e-mail refer to http://ffdba.com/)
tb******@mightyware.com (Todd Bandrowsky) wrote:
Since SQL Server is everywhere, is Access dying a slow death? Is
Access going the way of the FoxPro, destined to be the last of the
desktop databases?
Access is not dead or dying. MS are happily working on the next version of Access.
Program Managers have been occasionally spotted over in the microsoft.public.access.*
newsgroups asking what features folks would like.
Furthermore Access very nicely works as the front end to SQL Server too.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
这篇关于访问死了吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
