学什么？ [英] What to learn?

问题描述

我会认为自己是一个c ++爱好者。相反，我在个人项目级别主要编程
。我开始学习的时候我大约十二岁（现在是十八岁），阅读我在

本地图书馆找到的各种书籍。 1999年，当我学习了C ++ 96时，我意识到从别人的老化书堆中读取它真的不是一个好主意。要获得
这个有点偏离主题的帖子到目前为止，我的c ++书籍知识迄今为止

包括：


各种filth出版社出版的垃圾书，即24小时教你自己c ++，临床延迟的c ++等等...

关于插座，窗户/制造商的各种特定的书籍编程，

在posix环境中编程......等等。
极限编程在行动中

Stroustrup''s' C ++编程语言

Scott Meyer的Effective C ++，More Effective C ++和Effective STL。

Josuttis的The C ++标准库

Alexandrescu的现代C ++设计


最近，我已经拿起了，但尚未阅读：

Robert Sedgewick - C ++中的算法，第1-4部分和第5部分

以及GOF书。


我想知道怎么回事我的书架缺乏的书籍，是否有人可以提供任何关于是否首先进行算法或模式的建议，因为任何一个主题

不会出现在我的议程的首要任务将花费很长时间来吸收b $ b吸收。任何其他丰富我的编程重复的技巧都将非常值得赞赏。

I''d consider myself something of a c++ hobbyist. Rather, I program mainly
at a personal project level. I started learning when I was about twelve
years old (currently eighteen), reading various books I could find at the
local library. In 1999, when I learned about C++96, I realized that it
really wasn''t a great idea to read from someone else''s aging book heap. To
bring this somewhat off-topic post to a point, my c++ book knowledge to date
consists of:

Various trash books by filth publishers, i.e. teach yourself c++ in 24
hours, c++ for the clinically retarded...etc
Various implimentation-specific books on sockets, windows/mfc programming,
programming in a posix environment...etc.
"Extreme Programming In Action"
Stroustrup''s "The C++ Programming Language"
Scott Meyer''s "Effective C++", "More Effective C++", and "Effective STL".
Josuttis''s "The C++ Standard Library"
Alexandrescu''s "Modern C++ Design"

Recently, I''ve picked up, but have yet to read:
Robert Sedgewick - "Algorithms in C++", Parts 1-4 and Part 5
along with the GOF book.

I''m wondering what good books my shelf lacks, whether anyone can offer any
advice as to whether to pursue Algorithms or Patterns first, as either topic
isn''t going to be at the top of my agenda and will take a very long time to
absorb. Any other tips to enrich my programming repetoire will be much
appreciated.

推荐答案

>我想知道我的书架缺少什么好书，是否有人可以提供任何

> I''m wondering what good books my shelf lacks, whether anyone can offer any

关于是否首先追求算法或模式的建议，因为
主题不会是在我的议程的首位，将花费很长时间
来吸收。

advice as to whether to pursue Algorithms or Patterns first, as either topic isn''t going to be at the top of my agenda and will take a very long time to absorb.

冒着听起来自私自利的风险，我想要建议加速

C ++。虽然您可能会发现其中的大部分材料都很熟悉，但我希望您可能还会发现它的呈现方式可以为您提供新的见解。如何用C ++编程。

At the risk of sounding self-serving, I''d like to recommend "Accelerated
C++". Although you may find that much of the material in it is familiar, I
expect that you will probably also find it to be presented in a way that
offers new insight into how to program in C++.

" Walter Kalata" < PL **** @ ucwphilly.rr.com>在消息中写道

新闻：QZ ********************* @ twister.nyc.rr.com ...

"Walter Kalata" <pl****@ucwphilly.rr.com> wrote in message
news:QZ*********************@twister.nyc.rr.com...

最近，我已经接受了，但还没有读过：
Robert Sedgewick - C ++中的算法，第1-4部分和第5部分以及GOF书。

我想知道我的书架缺少什么好书，是否有人可以提供任何关于是否首先追求算法或模式的建议，如
主题不会成为我议程的首要任务，需要花费很长时间才能吸收b $ b。任何其他丰富我的编程重复的技巧都将非常受欢迎。

Recently, I''ve picked up, but have yet to read:
Robert Sedgewick - "Algorithms in C++", Parts 1-4 and Part 5
along with the GOF book.

I''m wondering what good books my shelf lacks, whether anyone can offer any
advice as to whether to pursue Algorithms or Patterns first, as either topic isn''t going to be at the top of my agenda and will take a very long time to absorb. Any other tips to enrich my programming repetoire will be much
appreciated.

坦率地说，虽然GOF模式书是第一个大的，可能是

非常有名，我觉得它没有那么有用。我觉得这本书很有名

更多是因为它是一本关于新主题的新书，而不是因为它很容易读取b
。我认为有些新的可能更好。另外，我没有读过算法书，但如果是我，我可能会发现更多

有用，这取决于我在浏览时所选择的内容。

Frankly, although the GOF patterns book was the first big one, and probably
rightly famous, I don''t find it all that useful. I think the book is famous
more because it was a new book on a new topic than because it''s easy to
read. I think there are some newer ones that might be better. Also, I
haven''t read the algorithms book, but if it were me I might find that more
useful, depending on what I picked up when skimming it.

Walter Kalata写道：

Walter Kalata wrote:

我想知道我的书架缺少哪些好书，是否有人可以
提供任何关于是否继续算法或模式的建议
首先，因为任何一个主题都不会成为我议程的首要任务


是的，你想要得到的东西*完成*，对吧？ :)不过，那种态度

可能是个错误。除了事实上，像Sedgewick这样的书中的许多特定算法

一旦你知道了关于他们的b $ b，他们就会派上用场，思考他们的属性及其工作原理他们这样做的方式 - 比如，Algorithmics - 可以帮助你以清晰，专注的方式思考你自己的程序。毕竟，那些是算法，除非它们不会终止;）它还会导致

自己找出一些模式，从而更深入

对术语模式的欣赏（尽管与GOF谈的是什么不同？

）。毫无疑问，你会发现你已经知道的很多东西，但只是隐含的。

任何其他丰富我的编程重复的技巧都会很多。 >赞赏。

I''m wondering what good books my shelf lacks, whether anyone can
offer any advice as to whether to pursue Algorithms or Patterns
first, as either topic isn''t going to be at the top of my agenda
Yes, you want to get something *done*, huh? :) Still, that attitude
might be a mistake. Besides the fact that many particular algorithms
in a book like Sedgewick''s will come in handy once you got to know
about them, pondering their properties and why they work the way they
do -- i.e., Algorithmics -- can help tremendously in thinking about
your own programs in a clear and focused way. After all, those are
algorithms, unless they don''t terminate ;) It will also lead to
figuring out some patterns all by yourself, and thus to a deeper
appreciation of the term "Pattern" (albeit on a different level from
what GOF talk about). No doubt you''ll hit on quite a few things you
already knew, but only implicitly.
Any other tips to enrich my programming repetoire will be much
appreciated.

看看你的阅读清单，我想你已经熟悉了

除了功能性编程的想法程序和

OO心态。拥有一个工具箱是件好事。

Martin

Looking at your reading list, I guess you''re already acquainted with
the idea of functional programming in addition to the procedural and
OO mindsets. It is a nice thing to have in one''s toolbox.
Martin

这篇关于学什么？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！