对新网站的评论请求...... [英] Comment on new website requested...

问题描述

嗨 - 我最近完成并推出了一个新的网站，我想要提供符合标准且符合标准的
。


我已经检查了它有各种在线验证器，它似乎来了

通过OK，但想知道是否有人有兴趣检查它。

http://www.aub-unison.org.uk/


干杯，

Colin。

Hi - I have recently finished and launched a new website, which I am
trying to make accessible and standards compliant.

I have checked it with various online validators and it seems to come
through OK, but wondered if anyone was interested in checking it out.

http://www.aub-unison.org.uk/

Cheers,
Colin.

推荐答案

se ***** @ hotmail.com （Colin Jones）写道：

se*****@hotmail.com (Colin Jones) wrote:

嗨 - 我最近完成并推出了一个新网站，我<试图使可访问性和标准兼容。

我已经使用各种在线验证器进行了检查，看起来好了，但是想知道是否有人有兴趣检查它。

http://www.aub-unison.org.uk/

Hi - I have recently finished and launched a new website, which I am
trying to make accessible and standards compliant.

I have checked it with various online validators and it seems to come
through OK, but wondered if anyone was interested in checking it out.

http://www.aub-unison.org.uk/

总的来说还不错，它适应各种窗口大小和字体尺寸

（在IE浏览器中除外，见下文）。


在页面上有多个一级标题是不寻常的

通常是错的。并且从什么时候开始一个版权声明一级

标题？


如果有一个标有RSS的图标就没有意义了'将
链接到RSS提要？而不是一个读取XML的东西？


所有页面链接到自己，这是可用性差的。


每页都有同样< title>，这又是一个糟糕的可用性，因为，对于

的例子，自动化网站制图软件会产生毫无意义的

结果。


如果您要链接到PDF而不提供更易于访问的

格式，那么您至少应该提供一个指向

的链接用户可以在哪里下载Acrobat Reader。还要始终指示您何时链接到PDF（或任何其他非标准文件类型），例如：链接

到加入我们页面的申请表格。


在％而不是em中调整文本大小可以避免IE中的问题

，当用户选择除Medium之外的

大小时，文本大小调整失控。 （即，当用户选择最小但文本大小为1em时，大小为100％的文本仍然清晰可辨，这应该是

相同，是微观的）。 />

alt =" Hand Writing"和alt =" meerkats.jpg"很穷纯装饰

图片应该有alt =""


欢呼，

史蒂夫


-

我的理论给你起见，我的异端邪说激怒你，

我从不回信，你也不喜欢我的领带。 - 医生


Steve Pugh< st *** @ pugh.net> < http://steve.pugh.net/>

Overall not bad, it adapts well to varied window sizes and font sizes
(except in IE, see below).

Having more than one level one heading on a page is unusual and
usually wrong. And since when was a copyright notice a level one
heading?

Wouldn''t it make more sense to have an icon that reads ''RSS'' to link
to the RSS feed? Rather than one that reads ''XML''?

All the pages link to themselves which is poor usability.

Every page has the same <title>, again this is poor usability as, for
example, automated site mapping software will produce a meaningless
result.

If you''re going to link to PDFs without providing a more accessible
format as well then the very least you should do is provide a link to
where the user can download Acrobat Reader. Also always indicate when
you link to a PDF (or any other non-standard file type), e.g. the link
to the application form on the Join Us page.

Sizing the text in % rather than em would avoid the problem in IE
whereby the text sizing gets out of control when the user has chosen a
size other than Medium. (i.e. text sized at 100% is still legible when
the user has chosen Smallest but text sized at 1em, which should be
the same, is microscopic).

alt="Hand Writing" and alt="meerkats.jpg" are poor. Purely decorative
images should have alt=""

cheers,
Steve

--
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you,
I never answer letters and you don''t like my tie." - The Doctor

Steve Pugh <st***@pugh.net> <http://steve.pugh.net/>

Colin Jones写道：

Colin Jones wrote:

嗨 - 我最近完成并发布了一个新网站，我试图使可访问和标准兼容。


快速浏览后，您似乎已经成功了。

想知道是否有人有兴趣查看它。


很乐意这样做。您可能想要考虑在下一次专门用于此类同行评审的

alt.html.critique中提出批评。 （如果你这次是
这样做，它将会多次转发，这可能会让你获得一些

火焰。）


我已经使用了html 4.01 / strict（而不是过渡版）。

考虑使用样式：hover（删除下划线，或更改

背景颜色）。我认为这有助于用户。 按钮指的是按钮。导航

非常好。事实上，整体而言，视觉效果非常吸引人。

检查不同的字体大小，没有任何中断。


我认为联系页面做得很好。添加电子邮件地址是一个很好的补充。为访客提供选择。总的来说就是避免垃圾邮件

的事情，目前正在讨论另一个

线程，所以请到那儿去更多。


访问密钥也受到激烈争论。这里讨论了几个月后的b $ b。我认为有一个坏主意，因为它们会干扰浏览器键盘快捷键。生活在池塘的另一边，

我不熟悉英国的注册表，但我似乎记得有一些网站要求它们的b
法律吗？这是线程的开始：

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.xtra.co.nz


如果您搜索Google，还有其他人。
http ：//www.aub-unison.org.uk/

Hi - I have recently finished and launched a new website, which I am
trying to make accessible and standards compliant.
After a quick look around, you seem to have succeeded.
wondered if anyone was interested in checking it out.
Happy to do it. You might want to think about asking for critiques in
alt.html.critique, dedicated to such peer reviews, next time. (If you
do it this time, it will be multiposting, and that might earn you some
flames.)

I''d have gone with html 4.01/strict (instead of transitional).
Consider using styles for a:hover (remove the underline, or change the
background color). I think this helps users. The "button" navigation
is really nice. In fact, overall, the visual look is very appealing.
Checked different font sizes, and nothing breaks.

The contact page is well done, I think. Adding an email address is a
nice addition. Gives visitors the choice. There''s the whole avoid spam
thing, currently under discussion for the umteenth time in another
thread, so please go there for more.

The accesskey is also hotly debated. It was discussed here a few
months back. I think there a bad idea because they can interfere with
the browser keyboard shortcuts. Living on the other side of the pond,
I am not familiar with UK regs, but I seem to recall that there are
laws requiring them for some sites? Here''s the start of the thread:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.xtra.co.nz

There are others, too, if you search Google.
http://www.aub-unison.org.uk/

不幸的网址。如果全国性组织

给你分配了一个子域名，那就好了：


aub.unison.org.uk将是一个明显的选择，而且更容易对于人们来说，要记住
。并且不同的分支可以使用类似的结构。对于

示例，如果有利兹分支，则为leeds.unison.org.uk。欲了解更多信息

，请参阅

http://domains.dan.info/structure/subdomains.html

-

Brian（按照路线指示在我的地址给我发电子邮件）
http://www.tsmchughs.com/

Unfortunate url. If would have been nice if the national organization
had assigned you a subdomain:

aub.unison.org.uk would be an obvious choice, and easier for people to
remember. And a different branch could use a similar structure. For
example, if there''s a Leeds branch, leeds.unison.org.uk. For more info
on this, see

http://domains.dan.info/structure/subdomains.html

--
Brian (follow directions in my address to email me)
http://www.tsmchughs.com/

Steve Pugh< st *** @ pugh.net>在消息新闻中写道：< f0 ******************************** @ 4ax.com>。 ..

Steve Pugh <st***@pugh.net> wrote in message news:<f0********************************@4ax.com>. ..

在页面上有多个一级标题是不寻常的，而且通常是错误的。从什么时候开始，版权声明是一级的？


谢谢 - 我已经纠正了这个问题并将下级标题改为

下一个标题，所以只有一个h1标题。同样更正了

版权声明的昙花一现。

想要一个标有RSS链接的图标是不是更有意义>到RSS提要？而不是一个读XML？


据我所知，在读取RSS等方面，''XML''是（更多）

接受表格，尽管有，在较小程度上，使用RSS

图标。

所有页面链接到自己，这是可用性差。


抱歉 - 我真的不明白你的意思。

每个页面都有相同的< title>，这也是可用性差的原因，例如，自动站点映射软件会产生毫无意义的结果。


再次感谢 - 我也解决了这个问题。

如果您要链接到PDF而不提供更易于访问的格式那么至少你应该做的是提供一个链接到
用户可以下载Acrobat Reader。还要始终指明何时链接到PDF（或任何其他非标准文件类型），例如加入我们页面上的申请表格链接。


我在链接旁边放了一个PDF图标，并将文件扩展名保留为

- 你认为需要有什么东西吗？更多？我也会给Adobe下载一个链接

。

在％而不是em中调整文本大小可以避免IE中的问题
当用户选择了除Medium之外的
尺寸时失控。 （即，当用户选择最小但文本大小为1em时，大小为100％的文本仍然清晰可辨，这应该是相同的，是微观的）。


是的 - 之前我没有注意到这种效果 - 相当奇怪 - 我会想想那个。 :-)

alt =" Hand Writing"和alt =" meerkats.jpg"很穷纯粹的装饰
图像应该有alt =""

Having more than one level one heading on a page is unusual and
usually wrong. And since when was a copyright notice a level one
heading?
Thanks - I have corrected this and changed the lower level headings to
the next one down, so there is only one h1 heading. Also corrected
the blip of the copyright notice too.

Wouldn''t it make more sense to have an icon that reads ''RSS'' to link
to the RSS feed? Rather than one that reads ''XML''?
As far as I can tell from reading about RSS etc., ''XML'' is the (more)
accepted form, although there is, to a lesser degree, usage of RSS
icons as well.

All the pages link to themselves which is poor usability.

Sorry - I didn''t really understand what you meant here.
Every page has the same <title>, again this is poor usability as, for
example, automated site mapping software will produce a meaningless
result.
Thanks again - I have fixed this one too.

If you''re going to link to PDFs without providing a more accessible
format as well then the very least you should do is provide a link to
where the user can download Acrobat Reader. Also always indicate when
you link to a PDF (or any other non-standard file type), e.g. the link
to the application form on the Join Us page.
I had put a ''PDF'' icon next to the links, and left the file extension
on - do you think there needs to be something more? I will put a link
to Adobe for the download too.
Sizing the text in % rather than em would avoid the problem in IE
whereby the text sizing gets out of control when the user has chosen a
size other than Medium. (i.e. text sized at 100% is still legible when
the user has chosen Smallest but text sized at 1em, which should be
the same, is microscopic).
Yes - I hadn''t noticed that effect before - rather strange - I will
think about that one. :-)
alt="Hand Writing" and alt="meerkats.jpg" are poor. Purely decorative
images should have alt=""

空的alt标签允许残疾人访问 - 我认为

需要一个有意义的alt标签？


非常感谢您花时间查看网站史蒂夫 -

评论非常感谢。 />

祝你好运，

科林。

Are empty alt tags allowed for disability access though - I thought
that a meaningful alt tag was required?

Many thanks for taking the time to review the site Steve - the
comments are very much appreciated.

Best regards,
Colin.

这篇关于对新网站的评论请求......的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！