.NET 3.0 .... [英] .NET 3.0 ....
问题描述
与.NET 1.1相比，.NET 3.0带来了什么优势/新功能？使用1.1对当前系统有什么影响，
向后兼容性等。两个人之间可以进行一些比较吗？
这实际上是1.1和2.0之间的比较，因为.Net 3.0实际上是.b $ b。实际上.Net 2.0加上一些额外的库（WCF，WPF等）。下一个大的
变化来自.Net 3.5。
比较比比皆是;我找不到我经常引用的那个，但是 ：
http://blah.winsmarts.com//Post.aspx?postID=41
最大的变化是泛型，但其他各种功能。
但我同意这种观点：如果你*可以*改为2.0（来自
$ b） $ b 1.1），然后这样做。
你是否想要3.0取决于你在做什么;如果你正在使用
WSE / remoting那么WCF值得一看。如果你想要工作流，那么WF;
WPF是对GUI层的彻底改造，因此最好是
绿地网站，再加上它是一个全新的技能组合学习。
Marc
呃，哦 - 另一个流行语。什么是绿色领域。 - 一个版本的Web 2.0？
启发我们。
彼得
-
网站： http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog： http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
短网址和放大器;更多： http://ittyurl.net
" Marc Gravell"写道：
这是1.1和2.0之间的比较，因为.Net 3.0实际上是.b $ b。实际上.Net 2.0加上一些额外的库（WCF，WPF等）。下一个大的
变化来自.Net 3.5。
比较比比皆是;我找不到我经常引用的那个，但是 ：
http://blah.winsmarts.com//Post.aspx?postID=41
最大的变化是泛型，但其他各种功能。
但我同意这种观点：如果你*可以*改为2.0（来自
$ b） $ b 1.1），然后这样做。
你是否想要3.0取决于你在做什么;如果你正在使用
WSE / remoting那么WCF值得一看。如果你想要工作流，那么WF;
WPF是对GUI层的彻底改造，因此最好是
绿地网站，再加上它是一个全新的技能组合学习。
Marc
呃，哦 - 另一个流行语。什么是绿色领域。 - 一个版本的Web
2.0？
如同 - 一个新项目;我知道你可以从WPF< --- winform，
谈谈，但它有点乱。此外，它提供了一个不一致的UI与
不同形式的工作方式不同。因此，对于新项目，IMO，WPF最好保留
，而非作为已建立产品的插件。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenfield_project
Marc
Hi,
What are the advantages/new features .NET 3.0 brings in compared
to .NET 1.1.What are the impacts on the current system using 1.1,
backward compatibility etc. Can i get some heads-on comparison between
the two?
This is really a comparison between 1.1 and 2.0, as .Net 3.0 is
actually .Net 2.0 plus a few extra libs (WCF, WPF etc). The next big
change comes in .Net 3.5.
Comparisons abound; I can''t find the one I usually quote, but how
about:
http://blah.winsmarts.com//Post.aspx?postID=41
The biggest change is generics, but various other features.
But I agree with the sentiment : if you *can* change to 2.0 (from
1.1), then do so.
Whether you want 3.0 depends on what you are doing; if you are using
WSE/remoting then WCF is worth a peek. If you want workflow then WF;
WPF is a complete overhaul of the GUI layer, so is best for
green-field sites, plus it is a whole new skillset to learn.
Marc
Uh, oh- another buzzword. What is "Green-field" - a version of Web 2.0?
Enlighten us.
Peter
--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net
"Marc Gravell" wrote:
This is really a comparison between 1.1 and 2.0, as .Net 3.0 is
actually .Net 2.0 plus a few extra libs (WCF, WPF etc). The next big
change comes in .Net 3.5.
Comparisons abound; I can''t find the one I usually quote, but how
about:
http://blah.winsmarts.com//Post.aspx?postID=41
The biggest change is generics, but various other features.
But I agree with the sentiment : if you *can* change to 2.0 (from
1.1), then do so.
Whether you want 3.0 depends on what you are doing; if you are using
WSE/remoting then WCF is worth a peek. If you want workflow then WF;
WPF is a complete overhaul of the GUI layer, so is best for
green-field sites, plus it is a whole new skillset to learn.
Marc
Uh, oh- another buzzword. What is "Green-field" - a version of Web2.0?As in - a fresh project; I know you can talk from WPF <---winform,
but it gets a little messy. Plus it gives an inconsistent UI with
different forms working differently. Hence IMO, WPF is best reserved
for new projects, not as bolt-ons to established products.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenfield_project
Marc
这篇关于.NET 3.0 ....的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
