Koenig& Co.的Annotated C ++语言标准。斯特劳斯???? [英] The Annotated C++ Language Standard by Koenig & Stroustrup????
问题描述
在TC ++ PL（SE）中，Stroustrup声称有一个名为_The
的带有C ++语言标准的伴随引用，由Koenig&斯特劳斯。它没有在谷歌上显示
。什么给这里？我知道这里有一个问题
： http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#ARM 我想这是
同样的工作？这似乎意味着有一个完整的参考手册由两位最有资格的作者休闲写成。
。我发现这令人不安。
-
p-> m ==（* p）.m == p [0] .m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
In TC++PL(SE) Stroustrup asserts there is a companion reference called _The
Annotated C++ Language Standard_ by Koenig & Stroustrup. It doesn''t show
up on a google. What gives here? I know there is mention of a problem
here: http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#ARM I guess this is the
same work? This seems to mean there is a complete reference manual written
by the two most qualified authors laying fallow. I find that disturbing.
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
推荐答案
2004年4月9日星期五12:09:53 -0400，Steven T. Hatton
< su ****** @ setidava.kushan.aa>写道：
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:09:53 -0400, Steven T. Hatton
<su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote:
在TC ++ PL（SE）中，Stroustrup声称有一个名为
的附带参考文献。由Koenig&撰写的带注释的C ++语言标准。斯特劳斯。它没有在谷歌上显示
。什么给这里？我知道这里有一个问题
： http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#ARM 我猜这是同样的工作吗？这似乎意味着有一个完整的参考手册由两位最有资格的作者写下来。我发现这令人不安。
In TC++PL(SE) Stroustrup asserts there is a companion reference called
_The
Annotated C++ Language Standard_ by Koenig & Stroustrup. It doesn''t show
up on a google. What gives here? I know there is mention of a problem
here: http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#ARM I guess this is the
same work? This seems to mean there is a complete reference manual
written
by the two most qualified authors laying fallow. I find that disturbing.
您仍然可以从亚马逊[1]获得它，但它现在已经过时了。我估计大部分核心语言的覆盖范围仍然具有相关性，但我会认为它不是完整的，也不是可靠的，而且这就是你需要的东西
这样一本书中的
。似乎不太可能更新，部分
由于ISO的问题，但也因为市场已经成熟到
点这些天有一些标准文本从大多数角度来看，这涵盖了
所有内容。你可能想要的另一种选择
a看看Brokken的C ++ Annotations [2]。
[1]
http://www.amazon.com /exec/obidos/tg...28842?v=glance
[2] http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/
-
Mike Higginbottom
http://www.peak41.co.uk
You can still get it from Amazon[1] but it''s very out of date now. I
guess most of the core language coverage is still relevant but I''d
consider it neither complete nor reliable today and that''s what you need
in a book like this. It seems unlikely that this will be updated, partly
due to issues with ISO but also because the market has matured to the
point where there are a few standard texts these days that cover
everything from most perspectives. An alternative you might want to take
a look at is Brokken''s C++ Annotations[2].
[1]
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...28842?v=glance
[2] http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/
--
Mike Higginbottom
http://www.peak41.co.uk
2004年4月9日星期五12:09:53 -0400，Steven T. Hatton
< su ****** @ setidava.kushan。 AA>写道：
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:09:53 -0400, Steven T. Hatton
<su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote:
在TC ++ PL（SE）中，Stroustrup声称有一个名为
的附带参考文献。由Koenig&撰写的带注释的C ++语言标准。斯特劳斯。它没有在谷歌上显示
。什么给这里？我知道这里有一个问题
： http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#ARM 我猜这是同样的工作吗？这似乎意味着有一个完整的参考手册由两位最有资格的作者写下来。我发现这令人不安。
In TC++PL(SE) Stroustrup asserts there is a companion reference called
_The
Annotated C++ Language Standard_ by Koenig & Stroustrup. It doesn''t show
up on a google. What gives here? I know there is mention of a problem
here: http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#ARM I guess this is the
same work? This seems to mean there is a complete reference manual
written
by the two most qualified authors laying fallow. I find that disturbing.
您仍然可以从亚马逊[1]获得它，但它现在已经过时了。我估计大部分核心语言的覆盖范围仍然具有相关性，但我会认为它不是完整的，也不是可靠的，而且这就是你需要的东西
这样一本书中的
。似乎不太可能更新，部分
由于ISO的问题，但也因为市场已经成熟到
点这些天有一些标准文本从大多数角度来看，这涵盖了
所有内容。你可能想要的另一种选择
a看看Brokken的C ++ Annotations [2]。
[1]
http://www.amazon.com /exec/obidos/tg...28842?v=glance
[2] http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/
-
Mike Higginbottom
http://www.peak41.co.uk
You can still get it from Amazon[1] but it''s very out of date now. I
guess most of the core language coverage is still relevant but I''d
consider it neither complete nor reliable today and that''s what you need
in a book like this. It seems unlikely that this will be updated, partly
due to issues with ISO but also because the market has matured to the
point where there are a few standard texts these days that cover
everything from most perspectives. An alternative you might want to take
a look at is Brokken''s C++ Annotations[2].
[1]
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...28842?v=glance
[2] http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/
--
Mike Higginbottom
http://www.peak41.co.uk
Mike Higginbottom写道：
Mike Higginbottom wrote:
你仍然可以从亚马逊[1]获得它，但它现在已经过时了。
直到我重读这一章，我才想到同样的事情。但那是Ellis&
Stroustrup。我正在谈论的那个是Koenig&斯特劳斯。我有
[1]。它已经过时了。我猜大部分核心语言的报道仍然具有相关性，但是我今天认为它既不完整也不可靠，这就是你在这样的书中所需要的。似乎不太可能更新，部分
由于ISO的问题，但也因为市场已经成熟到现在有一些标准文本涵盖
的所有内容大多数观点。您可能想要看看的另一种选择是Brokken的C ++ Annotations [2]。
看起来确实很有用。我还没找到我想要的东西。
例如： http://www.cppreference.com/index.html 非常好，
但它有点短。如果我试图通过点击关键词找到使用/ const /的所有可能的语法
变体，我得到的只是
一般定义。我会批准你，一个新的ARM可能也不会以这种方式提供
信息。
[1]
http://www.amazon.com/ exec / obidos / tg ... 28842？v = glance [2] http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/
You can still get it from Amazon[1] but it''s very out of date now.
Until I reread the chapter, I thought the same thing. But that is Ellis &
Stroustrup. The one I was talking about was Koenig & Stroustrup. I have
[1]. It is _way_ out of date. I
guess most of the core language coverage is still relevant but I''d
consider it neither complete nor reliable today and that''s what you need
in a book like this. It seems unlikely that this will be updated, partly
due to issues with ISO but also because the market has matured to the
point where there are a few standard texts these days that cover
everything from most perspectives. An alternative you might want to take
a look at is Brokken''s C++ Annotations[2].
That does look work bookmarking. I have yet to find exactly what I want.
For example this: http://www.cppreference.com/index.html is pretty nice,
but it falls a bit short. If I try to find all the possible syntactic
variants of the use of /const/ by clicking the key word, all I get is a
general definition. I''ll grant you, a new ARM would probably not present
information that way either.
[1]
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...28842?v=glance [2] http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/
我偶然发现了这个。它可能有点太行人了，但它也可能足够完成核心语言参考：
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jallert/cs1521...ew/ ppframe.htm
我一直想找个借口发布这个。现在我拥有它：
http：//www.cs .unm.edu /〜麦当劳/ cs108 /
-
p-> m ==（* p）.m == p [0 ] .m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
I stumbled onto this. It may be a bit too pedestrian, but it may also be
complete enough for a core language reference:
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jallert/cs1521...ew/ppframe.htm
I''ve been wanting an excuse to post this one. Now I have it:
http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mcdonald/cs108/
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
这篇关于Koenig& Co.的Annotated C ++语言标准。斯特劳斯????的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
