CSS布局与成本 [英] CSS Layout vs. cost
问题描述
我一直在使用CSS布局（无表格），我认为这是创建页面的最佳方式，但我一直很关心关于
提高成本与行业内的激烈竞争。
我能看到的是我花了大约更多时间来创建布局< CSS中的
，当我必须在所有页面上进行更改时，我看不到任何好处
（我在这里谈论布局，而不是外观和感觉）。
创建基于表格的布局+ CSS外观&我认为，在长期运行中感觉更有意义，因为它更快（这里有一个经济问题），并且全球外观&感觉取决于1个文件。
您怎么看？
-
使用Opera''革命性的电子邮件客户端： http://www.opera.com/mail/
发现歌剧： http://members.surfeu.fi / jerkku /
http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net
I''ve been using CSS layout (Tableless) for some time now, and I think it''s
the best way to create a page, but I''ve been quite concerned about the
raising cost vs. fierce competition in the industry.
What I can see is that I take roughly a lot more time to create a layout
in CSS, and I don''t see benefits when I have to do a change on all pages
(I''m talking about the layout here, not the look and feel).
Creating table-based layout + CSS look & feel makes more sense on the long
run, I think, because it is quicker (there is an economic issue here), and
the global look & feel depends on 1 file.
What do you think?
--
Using Opera''s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Discover Opera: http://members.surfeu.fi/jerkku/
http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net
推荐答案
未知用户写道：
我一直在使用CSS布局（无表格），我觉得它是'创建页面的最佳方式，但我一直非常关注提高成本与业内激烈竞争。
成本是多少？
我能看到的是我花了大约的时间在CSS中创建一个
布局，当我不得不对所有页面进行更改时，我看不到好处（我在这里谈的是布局，而不是外观和感觉）。
创建基于表格的布局+ CSS外观&从长远来看，感觉更有意义，因为它更快（这里有经济问题），以及全球外观和感觉取决于1个文件。
I''ve been using CSS layout (Tableless) for some time now, and I think
it''s the best way to create a page, but I''ve been quite concerned about
the raising cost vs. fierce competition in the industry.
What costs?
What I can see is that I take roughly a lot more time to create a
layout in CSS, and I don''t see benefits when I have to do a change on
all pages (I''m talking about the layout here, not the look and feel).
Creating table-based layout + CSS look & feel makes more sense on the
long run, I think, because it is quicker (there is an economic issue
here), and the global look & feel depends on 1 file.
之前的两个陈述相互矛盾。看起来和
感觉与布局有什么不同？
-
jmm dash list（at）sohnen-moe（ dot）com
（删除电子邮件的.AXSPAMGN）
The two previous statements contradict each other. And how is look and
feel different from layout?
--
jmm dash list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
文章< gb ************ ********@giganews.com>，
Jim Moe< jm *************** @ sohnen-moe.com>写道：
（snip）
In article <gb********************@giganews.com>,
Jim Moe <jm***************@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:
(snip)
之前的两个陈述相互矛盾。看起来和布局有什么不同？
The two previous statements contradict each other. And how is look and
feel different from layout?
也许他认为像字体和颜色这样的东西看起来和
感觉，而布局只是事物的相对定位。
无论如何，这是我的猜测。
- Mark
Maybe he''s thinking that things like fonts and colours are look and
feel, whereas layout is just about the relative positioning of things.
That''s my guess, anyway.
-- Mark
2005年1月24日18:44:46 +0000（GMT），Mark Carroll
< ma *** @ chiark.greenend.org .UK>写道：
On 24 Jan 2005 18:44:46 +0000 (GMT), Mark Carroll
<ma***@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
在文章< gb ******************** @ giganews.com> ;,
吉姆Moe< jm *************** @ sohnen-moe.com>写道：
（剪辑）
In article <gb********************@giganews.com>,
Jim Moe <jm***************@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:
(snip)
前两个陈述相互矛盾。外观与布局有何不同？
The two previous statements contradict each other. And how is look and
feel different from layout?
也许他认为像字体和颜色这样的东西看起来和感觉，而布局是关于事情的相对定位。
无论如何，这是我的猜测。
- 马克
Maybe he''s thinking that things like fonts and colours are look and
feel, whereas layout is just about the relative positioning of things.
That''s my guess, anyway.
-- Mark
是的，这就是我的意思。
-
使用Opera的革命性电子邮件客户端： http://www.opera.com/mail/
发现Opera： http://members.surfeu.fi/jerkku/
http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net
Yes, it''s what I mean.
--
Using Opera''s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Discover Opera: http://members.surfeu.fi/jerkku/
http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net
这篇关于CSS布局与成本的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
