一场小小的辩论，需要帮助！ [英] A wee debate, help needed!
问题描述
我知道这不是真正相关的，但你可以说火狐和CSS之间有很大的关系！
我最近写了一篇文章在我的博客上支持firefox并且已经收到了相当多的反对我的想法的毫无价值的论据。
如果有任何人想要借出一手贷款，我会非常赞赏
很感激!!!
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives/2005/11/17/firefox/
I know this is not really relavant but you could argue there is quite a
big relationship between Firefox and CSS!
I recently wrote an article on my blog supporting firefox and have
recieved a considerable amount of worthless arguments against my ideas.
If anyone fancies coming over a lending a hand I would greatly
appreciate it!!!
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives/2005/11/17/firefox/
推荐答案
bi****@hotmail.com 写道：
我知道这不是真的相关但你可以说火狐和CSS之间有很大的关系！
它解析它，这就是它。
我最近在我的博客上写了一篇文章支持firefox并且有
收到了相当多的反对我的想法的毫无价值的论据。
如果有任何人想要借出一只手，我会非常感激它！
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives/2005/11/17/firefox /
I know this is not really relavant but you could argue there is quite a
big relationship between Firefox and CSS!
"It parses it", that''s about it.
I recently wrote an article on my blog supporting firefox and have
recieved a considerable amount of worthless arguments against my ideas.
If anyone fancies coming over a lending a hand I would greatly
appreciate it!!!
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives/2005/11/17/firefox/
您的文章说：
我们看到您正在使用Internet Explorer。尝试使用Firefox，你会喜欢的。
更好。
....实际上，我正在使用Lynx。
Your article says:
We see you''re using Internet Explorer. Try Firefox, you''ll like it
better.
.... actually, I''m using Lynx.
在消息< 11 ********************** @ g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> ;,, br />
David Dorward< do ***** @ gmail.com>写道
In message <11**********************@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
David Dorward <do*****@gmail.com> writes
bi **** @ hotmail.com写道：
bi****@hotmail.com wrote:
我知道这不是真正的相关但你可以说有很大的关系Firefox和CSS！
I know this is not really relavant but you could argue there is quite a
big relationship between Firefox and CSS!
它解析它，就是它。
"It parses it", that''s about it.
我最近在我的博客上写了一篇文章支持firefox并且已经收到了相当多的反对我的想法的毫无价值的论据。
如果有任何人想要借出一只手，我会非常感激它！
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives / 2005/11/17 / firefox /
I recently wrote an article on my blog supporting firefox and have
recieved a considerable amount of worthless arguments against my ideas.
If anyone fancies coming over a lending a hand I would greatly
appreciate it!!!
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives/2005/11/17/firefox/
你的文章说：
我们看到你正在使用Internet Explorer。尝试Firefox，你会更喜欢它。
...实际上，我正在使用Lynx。
Your article says:
We see you''re using Internet Explorer. Try Firefox, you''ll like it
better.
... actually, I''m using Lynx.
我'' d而不是从Opera切换......！
-
Chris Hughes
http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
在星期二， 2005年11月22日，David Dorward写道：
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, David Dorward wrote:
http://www.hopkins81.com/archives/2005/11/17/firefox/
您的文章说：
我们看到您正在使用Internet Explorer。尝试Firefox，你会更喜欢它。
...实际上，我正在使用Lynx。
Your article says:
We see you''re using Internet Explorer. Try Firefox, you''ll like it
better.
... actually, I''m using Lynx.
但文章声称：
||它只对使用IE的人可见。
有些错误，Shirley ...
我的印象是页面依赖于Javascript和CSS
的成功，但省略了使用简单可靠的方案
*真的*工作，即MSIE条件评论。
而且，经常如此：它声称要验证，并提供一个链接，
表明它不会。
我不认为严肃的网页设计师会有太多的恐惧。
尽管如此，隐藏在这个糟粕下的宝贵信息仍然存在。
But the article claims:
|| It is only visible to people who use IE.
Some mistake, Shirley...
I have the impression that the page relies on both Javascript and CSS
for success, but omits to use the simple and reliable scheme which
would *really* work, namely MSIE "conditional comments".
And, as so often: it claims to validate, and provides a link which
demonstrates that it doesn''t.
I don''t think serious web designers have much to fear.
There''s a valuable message hidden underneath this dross, though.
这篇关于一场小小的辩论，需要帮助！的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
