非Windows操作系统上的Dot Net [英] Dot Net on non-windows OS
问题描述
在我看来，为了让微软能够通过windows os生存，他们需要在其他平台上支持DOT.NET。这首先不是DOT.NET的理由，要打破
窗口操作系统的依赖性。我认为他们应该直接扮演dot net the mac
和linux。如果Sun做了一件事，那就是将java VM移植到所有流行的平台上，确保其广泛使用。微软应该和
相同。他们应该在这方面发挥积极作用，而不是依靠Mono
项目为他们做这件事。有没有人知道这是否在地址？
microsoft？
I seems to me that in order for microsoft to survive past the windows os,
that they need to support DOT.NET on other platforms. Wasn''t this the
rationel for DOT.NET in the first place, To break the dependancy on the
window os. I think they should take a direct role in bring dot net the mac
and linux. If Sun did one thing right, it was to port the java VM to all
popular platforms, insuring its wide spread use. Microsoft should do the
same. They should take an active role in this and not depend on the Mono
project to do it for them. Does anyone know if this is being address at
microsoft?
推荐答案
< =？Utf-8？B？ SmVmZnJleSBIYXVu？=< Jeffrey
Ha**@discussions.microsoft.com >>写道：
<=?Utf-8?B?SmVmZnJleSBIYXVu?= <Jeffrey
Ha**@discussions.microsoft.com>> wrote:
我觉得，为了让微软能够通过windows os生存，他们需要在其他平台上支持DOT.NET。
我不认为MS正试图生存过去的Windows操作系统 - 他们是
试图确保Windows继续运行。
首先，这不是DOT.NET的基本原理，打破
窗口os的依赖性。
不是，不是。它有助于弥合32位/ 64位的鸿沟，当然，
但我不认为操作系统独立性是其背后的主要原因之一
..NET。
我认为他们应该直接扮演dot net的网络和linux。如果Sun做了一件事，那就是将java VM移植到所有流行的平台上，确保其广泛使用。
Sun显然不得不将Java移植到Windows - 它本来是致命的
不能。虽然很长一段时间他们正式支持Linux
端口 - 多年来它来自blackdown.org。
微软应该做同样的事情。他们应该在这方面发挥积极作用，而不是依靠Mono
项目为他们做这件事。有谁知道这是在微软的地址吗？
I seems to me that in order for microsoft to survive past the windows os,
that they need to support DOT.NET on other platforms.
I don''t think MS is trying to survive "past the Windows OS" - they''re
trying to make sure that Windows keeps going.
Wasn''t this the
rationel for DOT.NET in the first place, To break the dependancy on the
window os.
Not really, no. It helps to bridge the 32-bit/64-bit divide, of course,
but I don''t think OS-independence was one of the major reasons behind
..NET.
I think they should take a direct role in bring dot net the mac
and linux. If Sun did one thing right, it was to port the java VM to all
popular platforms, insuring its wide spread use.
Sun obviously had to port Java to Windows - it would have been fatal
not to. It was a long time before they officially supported the Linux
port though - for years it came from blackdown.org.
Microsoft should do the
same. They should take an active role in this and not depend on the Mono
project to do it for them. Does anyone know if this is being address at
microsoft?
我怀疑它是否被解决了很多，除了转子
项目。我没有看到任何证据表明MS非常关心在其他操作系统上运行的.NET
应用程序。
-
Jon Skeet - < sk *** @ pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
如果回复小组，请不要给我发邮件
I doubt that it''s being addressed very much, apart from by the Rotor
project. I haven''t seen any evidence that MS cares very much about .NET
apps running on other operating systems.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Jeffrey Haun写道：
Jeffrey Haun wrote:
我认为，为了让微软能够在Windows操作系统中存活，他们需要在其他平台上支持DOT.NET。这首先不是DOT.NET的基本理由，打破了
窗口操作系统的依赖性。我认为他们应该直接扮演dot net the mac
和linux。如果Sun做了一件事，那就是将java VM移植到所有流行的平台上，确保其广泛使用。微软应该这样做。他们应该在这方面发挥积极作用，而不是依靠Mono
项目为他们做这件事。有谁知道这是否在微软的地址？
I seems to me that in order for microsoft to survive past the windows os,
that they need to support DOT.NET on other platforms. Wasn''t this the
rationel for DOT.NET in the first place, To break the dependancy on the
window os. I think they should take a direct role in bring dot net the mac
and linux. If Sun did one thing right, it was to port the java VM to all
popular platforms, insuring its wide spread use. Microsoft should do the
same. They should take an active role in this and not depend on the Mono
project to do it for them. Does anyone know if this is being address at
microsoft?
http://www.mono-project.com
我用过Mono，其中一些部分非常好用，其他人还不是很好的b $ b。只要他们有一个工作的System.Windows.Forms版本
这对于想要在Linux上运行他们的
应用程序的Windows开发人员来说非常好。如果微软没有关闭它们，那么它们就会被关闭......
http://www.mono-project.com
I''ve used Mono and some parts of it are very good, others aren''t quite
there yet. As soon as they have a working System.Windows.Forms version
this could be great for windows developers that want to get their
applications running on Linux. Provided that Microsoft doesn''t shut
them down...
我认为Mono总是会有点蹩脚。单声道的人总是在追赶他们，他们正在做这件事，而没有任何机会可以获得
MS开发团队的战略路线图。他们想去哪里.Net。
Miguel de Acaza是一个非常敏锐的家伙，我毫不怀疑，这无疑是一个非常好的
具有挑战性和雄心勃勃的目标，即开发.Net的开源式多平台实施方案。但是对于那些按照b
工作的普通人来说，总是会出现跟随某人的情况
其他的影子，做什么他们做了什么，但总是落后一年或更多。
当你根据当前版本的MS .Net的东西获得一些工作时，一个新的MS的发布即将到来或已经到了
。我自己，我认为这将是非常令人沮丧的工作。
我记得进入VB6级别的通用控制的辛勤工作
更换项目，几年前由一群顶级的VB开发人员提供。
当.Net出现时，它有点打败了他们。只需
想想当Avalon和XAML出现时Mono会发生什么。
转到 http://www.mono-project.com/about/index.html 并按照博客链接
然后读一下单声道人对这个过程的看法。
也许这只是我，但它听起来不是很多好玩。
太糟糕了......
Tom Dacon
Dacon软件咨询
Davy Brion < RA **** @ gmail.com>在消息中写道
新闻：g2 *********************** @ phobos.telenet-ops.be ...
I think Mono is always going to be kind of lame. The Mono people are always
going to be playing catch-up, and they''re doing it without any access to the
MS development team''s strategic roadmap for where they want to take .Net.
Miguel de Acaza is a real sharp guy, I have no doubt, and it''s undoubtedly a
greatly challenging and ambitious goal to produce an open-source
multi-platform implementation of .Net. But for the rank and file people who
work on it, it''s always going to be a case of following along in someone
else''s shadow, doing what they do, but always being a year or more behind.
By the time you get something working according to the current release of
the MS .Net stuff, a new release from MS is on the horizon or has already
arrived. Myself, I think it''d be pretty demoralizing work.
I remember the hard work that went into the VB6-level Common Control
Replacement Project, by a bunch of top-flight VB developers some years ago.
When .Net came along, it kind of knocked the stuffing out of them. Just
think what''s going to happen to Mono when Avalon and XAML come along.
Go to http://www.mono-project.com/about/index.html and follow the Blogs link
and do some reading about what the mono people are saying about the process.
Maybe it''s just me, but it doesn''t sound like a lot of fun.
Too bad...
Tom Dacon
Dacon Software Consulting
"Davy Brion" <ra****@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g2***********************@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Jeffrey Haun写道：
Jeffrey Haun wrote:
我觉得，为了让微软能够在Windows操作系统中存活，他们需要在其他平台上支持DOT.NET。这首先不是DOT.NET的基本理由，打破了
窗口操作系统的依赖性。我认为他们应该直接扮演带网点的mac和linux。如果Sun做了一件事，那就是将java VM移植到所有流行的平台上，确保其广泛使用。微软应该做同样的事情。他们应该在这方面发挥积极作用，而不是依赖于Mono项目为他们做这件事。有谁知道这是微软公司的地址吗？
I seems to me that in order for microsoft to survive past the windows os,
that they need to support DOT.NET on other platforms. Wasn''t this the
rationel for DOT.NET in the first place, To break the dependancy on the
window os. I think they should take a direct role in bring dot net the
mac and linux. If Sun did one thing right, it was to port the java VM to
all popular platforms, insuring its wide spread use. Microsoft should do
the same. They should take an active role in this and not depend on the
Mono project to do it for them. Does anyone know if this is being address
at microsoft?
http://www.mono-project.com
我使用过Mono，其中一些部分非常好，其他部分都没有还没有。只要他们有一个正常工作的System.Windows.Forms版本，这对于希望在Linux上运行其应用程序的Windows开发人员来说非常有用。如果微软没有关闭它们
......
http://www.mono-project.com
I''ve used Mono and some parts of it are very good, others aren''t quite
there yet. As soon as they have a working System.Windows.Forms version
this could be great for windows developers that want to get their
applications running on Linux. Provided that Microsoft doesn''t shut them
down...
这篇关于非Windows操作系统上的Dot Net的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
