你好，世界... [英] Hello World...
问题描述
我刚开始进入C ++之旅。我这里有一本书，在第一个教程HelloWorld中找到了
。我有一个向后的警告。经过一些
研究我输入的代码后我发现有一个标准，所以我猜这本书是基于旧代码的。没过多久我就找到了需要修理它的东西。我正在使用Borland BuilderX个人版，它给了
我的警告，但我也有一份Borland Turbo 1.01和这个旧的
代码工作正常。我希望发生这种情况。
我想知道，我是否应该购买一本基于标准
的新书来学习？或者继续阅读这本书可能会更好，但
知道有一个标准，这里可能会有一些警告
那里？ ...我只是在想，因为我有2个基于旧的程序和
编写C ++的新方法，对于
来说，了解它们可能是一个好主意。学习过程，因为它可能有助于以后调试..我不知道。
提前谢谢，
史蒂夫。
Hi, I am just beginning my journey into C++. I have a book here and found in
the first tutorial "HelloWorld" that I had a backward warning. After some
research into the code I typed I found that there was a standard so I guess
this book is based on old code. It didn''t take long and I found what I
needed to fix it. I am using Borland BuilderX personal edition, which gave
me the warning, but I also have a copy of Borland Turbo 1.01 and this old
code worked fine. Which I expected to happen.
I would like to know, should I buy a new book that is based on the standard
to learn from? or might it be better to keep going through this book, but
knowing that there is a standard and that there may be a few warnings here
and there? ...I am just thinking becuase I have 2 programs based on old and
new ways of writing C++ that it might be a good idea to know about both for
the learning process, as it may help for debugging later.. I don''t know.
Thanks in advance,
Steve.
推荐答案
" Steve" < GI ****** @ hotmail.com>写道...
"Steve" <gi******@hotmail.com> wrote...
我刚开始进入C ++之旅。我这里有一本书，在第一个教程HelloWorld中找到了
。我有一个向后的警告。在对我输入的代码进行了一些研究之后，我发现有一个标准，所以I
猜这本书是基于旧代码的。没过多久我找到了解决它所需要的东西。我正在使用Borland BuilderX个人版，它给了我警告，但我也有一份Borland Turbo 1.01，这个旧的
代码工作得很好。我希望发生这种情况。
我想知道，我应该购买一本基于
标准的新书来学习吗？
拥有一本体面的书总是一个好主意。
或者继续阅读这本书可能会更好，但是
知道有一个标准，这里可能会有一些警告
那里？
该书中代码的非标准合规性也受到您正在使用的编译器的违规行为的影响。知道哪个系统的b $ b部分不适合你，这要好得多。为此你需要
a完全正确的编译器（很难找到）或完全正确的书
（更容易找到）。
。 ..我只是想，因为我有两个基于旧的和编写C ++的新方法的程序，这对于学习过程知道两个
可能是一个好主意，因为它可能有助于调试后来......我不知道。
Hi, I am just beginning my journey into C++. I have a book here and found in the first tutorial "HelloWorld" that I had a backward warning. After some
research into the code I typed I found that there was a standard so I guess this book is based on old code. It didn''t take long and I found what I
needed to fix it. I am using Borland BuilderX personal edition, which gave
me the warning, but I also have a copy of Borland Turbo 1.01 and this old
code worked fine. Which I expected to happen.
I would like to know, should I buy a new book that is based on the standard to learn from?
It''s always a good idea to have a decent book.
or might it be better to keep going through this book, but
knowing that there is a standard and that there may be a few warnings here
and there?
The non-standard-compliance of the code in that book is also tainted by the
non-compliance of the compiler you''re using. It''s much better to know which
part of the system is not working for you. For that you need either
a completely correct compiler (hard to find) or a completely correct book
(much easier to find).
...I am just thinking becuase I have 2 programs based on old and
new ways of writing C++ that it might be a good idea to know about both for the learning process, as it may help for debugging later.. I don''t know.
可能。你总是可以购买一本旧书，这本书是由一个知道
他们所说的人写的，比如Stroustrup和EllisAnnotated Reference
Manual
或早期版本的The C ++ Programming Language中的一个。看看以前语言看起来像什么？b $ b什么不是一个好主意是买一本充满错误的书b $ b（即使是现代的措施）。
Victor
It might. You could always buy an older book written by somebody who knew
what they were saying, like Stroustrup and Ellis "Annotated Reference
Manual"
or one of earlier editions of "The C++ Programming Language" to see what
the language looked like before. What isn''t a good idea is to buy a book
that is full of errors (even by its contemporary measures).
Victor
On Tue，2004年7月27日10:32:43 +0930，Steve < gi ****** @ hotmail.com>
写道：
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:32:43 +0930, "Steve" <gi******@hotmail.com>
wrote:
我刚开始进入C ++之旅。我这里有一本书，在第一个教程HelloWorld中找到了。我有一个向后的警告。在对我输入的代码进行了一些研究之后，我发现有一个标准，所以我猜这本书是基于旧代码的。没过多久我找到了解决它所需要的东西。我正在使用Borland BuilderX个人版，它给了我警告，但我也有一份Borland Turbo 1.01，这个旧的
代码工作得很好。我希望发生这种情况。
我想知道，我应该购买一本基于标准的新书来学习吗？或者继续阅读这本书可能会更好，但是知道有一个标准，并且这里可能会有一些警告
和那里？ ...我只是在想，因为我有两个基于旧的和基于旧的C ++编写方式的程序，对于学习过程两者都可能是一个好主意，因为它可能有助于稍后调试..我不知道。
提前致谢，史蒂夫。
Hi, I am just beginning my journey into C++. I have a book here and found in
the first tutorial "HelloWorld" that I had a backward warning. After some
research into the code I typed I found that there was a standard so I guess
this book is based on old code. It didn''t take long and I found what I
needed to fix it. I am using Borland BuilderX personal edition, which gave
me the warning, but I also have a copy of Borland Turbo 1.01 and this old
code worked fine. Which I expected to happen.
I would like to know, should I buy a new book that is based on the standard
to learn from? or might it be better to keep going through this book, but
knowing that there is a standard and that there may be a few warnings here
and there? ...I am just thinking becuase I have 2 programs based on old and
new ways of writing C++ that it might be a good idea to know about both for
the learning process, as it may help for debugging later.. I don''t know.
Thanks in advance,
Steve.
我会推荐获得一些最新工具等。
两个优秀的文本，都是免费的。
C ++注释版本5.1.1a Frank B. Brokken
http：// www。 icce.rug.nl/documents/cpl...cplusplus.html
这是布鲁斯·埃克尔的在线书籍：用C ++思考第1卷& 2，
也很棒...
http://www.mindview.net/Books
欲了解更多信息。
www.aacu.org
马克
-
[C ++ FAQ： http://www.parashift.com / c ++ - faq-lite / ]
I''d recommend getting some of the ''latest'' tools,etc.
Two excellent texts, both free.
C++ Annotations Version 5.1.1a Frank B. Brokken
http://www.icce.rug.nl/documents/cpl...cplusplus.html
Here is Bruce Eckel''s on-line books: Thinking in C++ Vol 1 & 2,
which are also excellent...
http://www.mindview.net/Books
For more info.
www.aacu.org
Mark
--
[ C++ FAQ: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ ]
" Mark" <毫安********** @ hotmail.com>写了...
"Mark" <ma**********@hotmail.com> wrote...
[...]
更多信息。
www.aacu.org
这篇关于你好，世界...的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
