远程脚本和Sun JVM [英] Remote Scripting and Sun JVM

问题描述

我有一个Web应用程序，它使用Remote Scripting为网页提供动态的
数据。我在Internet Explorer中测试应用程序

6 SP1在Windows XP Professional上运行。


当我使用Microsoft JVM时，应用程序无需任何工作/>
问题。但是，由于与Sun达成和解而未来取消了对微软JVM的支持，我需要确保

该应用程序可以正常使用用于Internet的Sun Java插件

资源管理器。不幸的是，当页面加载了Sun插件

时（通过查看

Internet选项的高级部分确认），一个Install On Demand对话框似乎说需要Java虚拟机组件，我想这就是微软JVM。


显然，这个组件不再可用，单击

确定按钮只重复此消息。当我单击取消

按钮时，远程脚本功能无法工作。


是否可以将远程脚本配置为使用

替代JVM，例如Sun Java Plug-In，还是完全取决于Microsoft版本？$ / b

非常感谢提前。

I have a Web application that uses Remote Scripting to provide dynamic
data to a web page. I am testing the application in Internet Explorer
6 SP1 running on Windows XP Professional.

When I use the Microsoft JVM, the application works without any
problems. However, as a result of future withdrawal of support of the
Microsoft JVM as a result of the settlement with Sun, I need to ensure
that the application works okay with the Sun Java plug-in for Internet
Explorer. Unfortunately, when the page loads with the Sun plug-in
enabled (confirmed by having a look at the Advanced section of the
Internet Options), an Install On Demand dialog appears stating that
the Java virtual machine component is required, which I imagine is the
Microsoft JVM.

Obviously, this component is no longer available, and clicking on the
OK button only reiterates this message. When I click on the Cancel
button instead, the Remote Scripting functionality fails to work.

Is it possible for Remote Scripting to be configured to work with an
alternative JVM, such as the Sun Java Plug-In, or is it entirely
dependent on the Microsoft version?

Many thanks in advance.

推荐答案

>我想象的是微软的JVM。


问题1：你能证实吗？我怀疑它依赖于某种类型的外部控制或某种类型的外部控制，但我现在无法确定

。

问题2：你在考虑放弃远程脚本吗？我的

个人观点是也许你应该，尽管其他人可能不同意。


________________________________________

Atrax。 MVP，IIS
http://rtfm.atrax.co.uk/


newsflash：Atrax.Richedit 1.0现已发布。
http://rtfm.atrax.co.uk/infinitemonk...trax.RichEdit/


***通过开发人员指南 http://www.developersdex.com 发送***

不要只是参加USENET ......获得奖励！

> which I imagine is the Microsoft JVM.

question 1 : can you confirm that? I suspect it IS dependent on a
proprietery class or external control of some sort, but I can''t say for
sure right now.
question 2 : are you considering abandoning remote scripting? my
personal view is that perhaps you should, though others may disagree.

________________________________________
Atrax. MVP, IIS
http://rtfm.atrax.co.uk/

newsflash : Atrax.Richedit 1.0 now released.
http://rtfm.atrax.co.uk/infinitemonk...trax.RichEdit/

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don''t just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

Atrax写道：

我想是Microsoft JVM。

which I imagine is the Microsoft JVM.

问题1：你能确认一下吗？我怀疑它依赖于某个类别的外部控制或某种类型的外部控制，但我现在肯定不能确定
。问题2：你在考虑放弃远程脚本吗？我的个人观点是，也许你应该这样，尽管其他人可能不同意。

question 1 : can you confirm that? I suspect it IS dependent on a
proprietery class or external control of some sort, but I can''t say
for sure right now.
question 2 : are you considering abandoning remote scripting? my
personal view is that perhaps you should, though others may disagree.

我不是。远程脚本已经死了。


Bob


-

Microsoft MVP - ASP / ASP.NET

请回复新闻组。这个电子邮件帐户是我的垃圾邮件陷阱所以我

不经常检查它。如果您必须离线回复，请删除

没有垃圾邮件

I don''t. Remote scripting is dead.

Bob

--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I
don''t check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the
"NO SPAM"

鲍勃写道：


我不是。远程脚本已经死了。


我很好奇为什么？我的Boss认为这是最好的事情，因为

切片面包。我是ASP的新手，所以我还没有形成

意见。

Bob Wrote:

"I don''t. Remote scripting is dead."

I''m curious why? My Boss thinks it''s the best thing since
slice bread. I''m new to ASP, so I haven''t formed an
opinion yet.

-----原帖---- -
Atrax写道：

-----Original Message-----
Atrax wrote:

我想象的是Microsoft JVM。
问题1：你能证实吗？我怀疑它是依赖于某种类别的外交控制或某种外部控制的
，但我现在不能肯定地说b $ b。问题2：你在考虑放弃远程
脚本？我的个人观点是，也许你应该这样，尽管其他人可能不同意。

which I imagine is the Microsoft JVM.
question 1 : can you confirm that? I suspect it IS dependent on a proprietery class or external control of some sort, but I can''t say for sure right now.
question 2 : are you considering abandoning remote scripting? my personal view is that perhaps you should, though others may disagree.

我不是。远程脚本已经死了。

Bob

-
Microsoft MVP - ASP / ASP.NET
请回复新闻组。这个电子邮件帐户是我的

I don''t. Remote scripting is dead.

Bob

--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my

垃圾邮件陷阱所以我不经常检查它。如果你必须离线回复，
然后删除NO SPAM

。

spam trap so Idon''t check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the"NO SPAM"
.

这篇关于远程脚本和Sun JVM的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！