请解释一下这个小组的情况？ [英] Please explain something about this group?

问题描述

作为一个试图学习Access的新手，我问过一些问题。

有些人非常有帮助，非常直接和简单的答案

帮助很多。其他人给我答案广泛的代码是很难让一个新手跟进，当答案很简单之后我会想出来。

对于那些试图学习获取帮助的人而言，这是一个合适的群体吗？b $ b而不是程序员吗？或者是人们只是拉我的腿。


例如我最近问了一个问题并得到了大约半页的

代码我只需要做的就是在

组部分的报告中使用Max（Field）+ 180。看完

代码的两段后我试过了。


如果我做错了请告诉我。

I have asked a number of questions as a newbie trying to learn Access.
Some folks have been very helpful with very direct and simple answers
that help alot. Others give me answers with extensive code that is
hard for a newbie to follow when the answer is quite simple after I
figure it out.

Is this the right group for people trying to learn access to get help
without being a programmer? Or are people just pulling my leg.

For example I recently asked a question and got about half a page of
code when all I had to do was use Max(Field)+ 180 on the report in the
group section. I tried this after looking at the two paragraphs of
code.

If I am doing something wrong please tell me.

推荐答案

你没有做错任何事，

这个群体中也没有任何其他人。


我们*倾向*代码密集，但这是我们的背景。

（好吧，至少那个'__背景。）一个数字我们倾向于b / b盲目支持通过那个背景更经常然后没有。


随着你作为Access开发人员的技能进步，我当然希望你能继续在这里分享你的知识吗？ 。对于相当多的我们来说，我们在这里尽可能多地学习*，因为我们要分享我们所知道的。

是否涉及代码！

You''re not doing anything wrong, nor are any of the other people in
this group.

We do *tend* to be a bit code intensive, but that''s our background.
(Well, at least that''s _my_ background.) A number of us tend to be
"blind-sided" by that background more often then not.

As you progress in your skills as an Access developer, I certainly hope
you will continue to share your knowledge here. For quite a number of
us, we are here as much to *learn* as we are to share what we know.
Whether it involves code or not!

" Randy" < RA **** @ msn.com>在消息中写道

news：11 ********************* @ g49g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com ...

"Randy" <ra****@msn.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@g49g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...

作为一个试图学习Access的新手，我问过一些问题。
有些人非常有帮助，非常直接和简单的答案
帮助很多。其他人给我答案的答案广泛，代码很难让新手在我解决之后答案非常简单。

这是否适合人群试图学习访问以获得帮助
而不是程序员？或者是人们只是拉我的腿。

例如，我最近问了一个问题并得到了大约半页的代码，当我所要做的就是使用Max（Field）+ 180 on
组部分中的报告。看完
代码的两段后我试了这个。

如果我做错了请告诉我。

I have asked a number of questions as a newbie trying to learn Access.
Some folks have been very helpful with very direct and simple answers
that help alot. Others give me answers with extensive code that is
hard for a newbie to follow when the answer is quite simple after I
figure it out.

Is this the right group for people trying to learn access to get help
without being a programmer? Or are people just pulling my leg.

For example I recently asked a question and got about half a page of
code when all I had to do was use Max(Field)+ 180 on the report in the
group section. I tried this after looking at the two paragraphs of
code.

If I am doing something wrong please tell me.

大多数讨论这里涉及使用vba代码或sql语句

，这可能是合理的技术。人们试图容纳那些新手，但是人们普遍认为，如果你想在任何用Access构建数据库的地方获得
，那么编码就成了必需

相当快。

您可以尝试使用以下内容预先修复您的请求：

我是新手。

我不写代码。

我不想写代码。

我只想让你的一个书呆子解决我的问题。

快速，简单，免费。并且不用任何困扰我的b $ b细节。

Most of the discussions here involve working with vba code or sql statements
which can be reasonably technical. People try to be accommodating for those
who are newbies but it is generally felt that if you are ever going to get
anywhere building databases with Access, then coding becomes a necessity
fairly quickly.
You could try pre-fixing your requests with the following:
I am a newbie.
I do not write code.
I do not want to write code.
I just want one of you nerds to sort out my problem.
Quickly, simply and for free. And without bothering me with any dorky
details.

2005年5月13日16:27:43 -0700，"好色" < RA **** @ msn.com>写道：


大多数回复都是真实的。我们偶尔会有一个巨魔或者jokester。


我知道我当然已经用几行VBA

代码回答了一个问题，但后来才知道了更优雅的解决方案需要

只有一个表达式。我们都生活和学习。


告诉别人你是新手是不可耻的。这可能会有所帮助

得到更多的回复。


-Tom。

On 13 May 2005 16:27:43 -0700, "Randy" <ra****@msn.com> wrote:

Most replies are genuine. We do have an occasional troll or jokester.

I know I certainly have answered a question with several lines of VBA
code, only to later learn of a much more elegant solution requiring
only a single expression. We all live and learn.

There is no shame in telling people you''re a newbie. It may help
getting more consise replies.

-Tom.

我问过作为一个试图学习Access的新手的一些问题。
有些人非常有帮助，非常直接和简单的答案
帮助很多。其他人给我答案的答案广泛，代码很难让新手在我解决之后答案非常简单。

这是否适合人群试图学习访问以获得帮助
而不是程序员？或者是人们只是拉我的腿。

例如，我最近问了一个问题并得到了大约半页的代码，当我所要做的就是使用Max（Field）+ 180 on
组部分中的报告。看完
代码的两段后我试了这个。

如果我做错了请告诉我。

I have asked a number of questions as a newbie trying to learn Access.
Some folks have been very helpful with very direct and simple answers
that help alot. Others give me answers with extensive code that is
hard for a newbie to follow when the answer is quite simple after I
figure it out.

Is this the right group for people trying to learn access to get help
without being a programmer? Or are people just pulling my leg.

For example I recently asked a question and got about half a page of
code when all I had to do was use Max(Field)+ 180 on the report in the
group section. I tried this after looking at the two paragraphs of
code.

If I am doing something wrong please tell me.

这篇关于请解释一下这个小组的情况？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！