XML评论 [英] XML Commenting

问题描述

C ++ / CLI是否具有类似C＃的XML样式注释？


如果我这样做///我没有像C＃那样完成＃

Does C++/CLI have XML style commenting like C#??

If i do /// I dont get the completion like C#

推荐答案

>来自：<。>

> From: <.>

C ++ / CLI是否具有类似C＃的XML样式注释？

如果我这样做///我没有完成喜欢C＃

Does C++/CLI have XML style commenting like C#??

If i do /// I dont get the completion like C#

我们的下一个版本（目前在Alpha中）将支持XML评论。


谢谢，
-

Tarek Madkour，Visual C ++团队

此帖子按原样提供，不提供任何保证，并且不授予任何权利。

Our next release (currently in Alpha) will have support for XML comments.

Thanks,
--
Tarek Madkour, Visual C++ Team
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

很好。


命名空间ONE :: TWO :: THREE而不是嵌套它们怎么样？因为

能够在一行上指定像C＃这样的命名空间会使它们更容易重构，而且代码更易读。


我在某地方读到__gc，__属性扩展关键字被替换为
以使它们变得更干净，这是真的吗？如果是这样的话我在哪里可以获得

文档。何时将这些提交给ECMA？


"" Tarek Madkour [MSFT]"" < TA **** @ online.microsoft.com>在消息中写道

新闻：GO ************** @ cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl ...

Great.

What about namespace ONE::TWO::THREE instead of having to nest them? Being
able to specify namespaces like C# on one line would make refactoring them
easier and also code more readable.

I read somewhere that the __gc, __property extension keywords are being
replaced to make them cleaner, is this true and if so where can I get the
docs on this. When will these be submitted to the ECMA?

""Tarek Madkour [MSFT]"" <ta****@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:GO**************@cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl...

来自：<。>

C ++ / CLI是否具有类似C＃的XML样式注释？

如果我这样做///我没有完成像C＃

From: <.>

Does C++/CLI have XML style commenting like C#??

If i do /// I dont get the completion like C#

我们的下一个版本（目前在Alpha中）将支持XML评论。

谢谢，
-
Tarek Madkour ，Visual C ++团队
此帖子按原样提供，不提供任何保证，并且不授予任何权利。

Our next release (currently in Alpha) will have support for XML comments.

Thanks,
--
Tarek Madkour, Visual C++ Team
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

..写道：

命名空间ONE :: TWO :: THREE而不是嵌套它们怎么样？能够在一行上指定C＃这样的命名空间会使重构变得更容易，而且代码更具可读性。


Hello dot，

在一个语句中打开并创建嵌套命名空间不是什么

我们要做什么在惠德贝。我们和ECMA委员会已经讨论过，

和一些事情我们正在将问题传递给ISO标准

委员会。希望他们会感到有必要解决它（我们参与其中，所以我们会试着强迫他们）。可能还需要一段时间，因为ISO标准

委员会仍处于创建新版本的早期阶段。

我在某处读到__gc，__属性扩展关键字是被取代以使它们更清洁，这是真的，如果是这样，我在哪里可以得到关于此的
文档。这些内容何时提交给ECMA？

What about namespace ONE::TWO::THREE instead of having to nest them? Being
able to specify namespaces like C# on one line would make refactoring
them easier and also code more readable.
Hello dot,
Opening and creating a nested namespace in one statement is not something
we''re going to do in Whidbey. We and the ECMA committee have discussed it,
and as with a few things we''re passing the issue to the ISO standards
committee. Hopefully, they''ll feel compelled to fix it (we''re involved, so
we''ll try to compell them). It may be a while, as the ISO standards
committee is still in the early stages of creating a new version.
I read somewhere that the __gc, __property extension keywords are being
replaced to make them cleaner, is this true and if so where can I get the
docs on this. When will these be submitted to the ECMA?

这项工作已经提交给ECMA。事实上，我们已经有两个

标准委员会会议来处理它。这是一个链接到

基础候选人草案的链接，讨论新语法发生了什么。

http://blogs.msdn.com/branbray/archi.../21/51029.aspx


-

Brandon Bray，Visual C ++编译器 http://blogs.msdn.com/branbray/

此帖子按原样提供，不提供任何保证，也不授予任何权利。

This work has already been submitted to ECMA. In fact, we''ve already had two
standards committee meetings to work on it. Here''s a link to a link to the
base candidate draft discussing what is happening with the new syntax.

http://blogs.msdn.com/branbray/archi.../21/51029.aspx

--
Brandon Bray, Visual C++ Compiler http://blogs.msdn.com/branbray/
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

这篇关于XML评论的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！