字段在Qooxdoo库中作为静态字段 [英] Fields are as static fields in Qooxdoo library
问题描述
我想使用qx-oo(Qooxdoo)作为OOP库。但我对场外成员的奇怪行为感到困惑。看起来这些字段在一个类的所有对象之间共享,就像静态成员一样。例如,此测试代码
I'd like to use qx-oo (Qooxdoo) as OOP library. But I was confused by strange behaviour of field members. It's looks like that fields are shared between all objects of one class, like static members. For example, this test code
qx.Class.define("com.BaseClass",
{
extend : qx.core.Object,
members:
{
_children: [],
getChildrenCount: function(){
return this._children.length;
},
addChild: function(child){
this._children.push(child);
}
}
});
var class1 = new com.BaseClass();
var class2 = new com.BaseClass();
showLog("class1.getChildrenCount() - " + class1.getChildrenCount())
showLog("class2.getChildrenCount() - " + class2.getChildrenCount())
class1.addChild("somechild");
showLog("class1.getChildrenCount() - " + class1.getChildrenCount())
showLog("class2.getChildrenCount() - " + class2.getChildrenCount())
将生成此类日志
class1.getChildrenCount() - 0
class2.getChildrenCount() - 0
class1.getChildrenCount() - 1
class2.getChildrenCount() - 1
有没有办法实现这个目标?
Is there a way to accomplish this?
或者你能建议另一个OOP吗? -js-lib?
这是一个完整的示例。
推荐答案
这不是qooxdoo的问题。您不应该在类描述上初始化引用类型。你应该用构造函数初始化引用类型。
This is not a issue from qooxdoo. You should not initialize reference types on the class description. You should initialize reference types with the constructor.
qooxdoo中有一篇好文章手册解释了这个问题。
There is a good article in the qooxdoo manual which explains the problem.
这是你的改进示例:
qx.Class.define("com.BaseClass",
{
extend : qx.core.Object,
construct: function() {
this._children = [];
},
members:
{
_children: null,
getChildrenCount: function(){
return this._children.length;
},
addChild: function(child){
this._children.push(child);
}
}
});
这篇关于字段在Qooxdoo库中作为静态字段的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!