是否有可能像编程一样自学网络? [英] is it possible to self educate networking like it is for programming?

查看:104
本文介绍了是否有可能像编程一样自学网络?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

与编程相比,网络是否更难学习和掌握?



哪个人需要更少思考?



您需要哪些职业才能让您的技能更具相关性和最新(哪一个变化更快)?

解决方案

它取决于你。如果你能在一个地区自学,为什么不在另一个地方呢?有些人不能在任何事情上进行自我教育,让我们希望你不是其中之一。

这两个问题,什么是更难和什么需要少思考都是完全错误的。这个想法是:有各种各样的困难和不同的思维方法。抛开不同的人以不同的方式思考的简单事实(许多人严重低估这一事实),不同类型之间的比较不能以任何预定义的方式构建。粗略地说,这就像比较苹果和橘子。即使您在某些情况下可以比较两类此类概念,也只能构建部分有序集 http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partially_ordered_set [ ^ ])。抛开那些类别也是模糊的。曾经听说过模糊集理论( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_set [ ^ ])? :-)



我对你提出的关于困难和少思考的事实感到不安。我不敢问......你是希望减少难度,减少思考,或者更多的困难和思考?让我告诉你:如果你真的看起来不那么困难和思考,你现在应该更好地放弃技术或科学专业,然后再放松。是的,就这么简单。我只是希望你不是那样的。



最后,让技能保持最新状态?另一个错误的问题有些情况下,缺少几个月的技术新闻会让你专业死亡,但......如果你只有一些最低限度的专业技能,你可以迅速恢复。基础知识和思维,对基础科学的理解,基本工作技能,分析和综合,这才是最重要的。重要的是能够跟上,而不是每隔一分钟都在上升。但这种能力本身非常重要。有许多真正的恐龙,有些甚至做好工作,但保持恐龙的态度导致变得一无所有。但也是技术时尚,酷的永久追逐。



-SA


is Networking more difficult to learn and master comparing to Programming?

which one needs less thinking more doing?

in which career do you need to keep your skills more relevant and up-to-date (which one changes more rapidly)?

解决方案

It rather depends on you. If you can self-educate you in one area, why not in another one? There are people who cannot self-educate in anything, let's hope you are not one of them.
Both questions, "what is more difficult" and "what needs less thinking" are both totally incorrect. The idea is: there are different sorts of difficulties and different methods of thinking. Set aside the simple fact that different people think in somewhat different ways (the fact badly underestimated by many), the comparison between different kind cannot be built in any predefined way. Roughly speaking, this is like comparing apples and oranges. Even if you can compare two categories of such notions in certain cases, you can only build partially ordered set (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partially_ordered_set[^]). Set aside that the categories are also fuzzy. Ever heard of fuzzy set theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_set[^])? :-)

I feel disturbed by the fact you are asking about both difficulty and "less thinking". I'm afraid to ask… Are you hoping for less difficulty and less thinking, or more difficulty and thinking? Let me tell you: if you are really looking less difficulty and thinking, you should better give up technological or scientific professions right now, before you loose more. Yes, as simple as that. I'm just hoping you are not like that.

And, finally, keeping the skills up-to-date? Another incorrect question. There are cases when missing few months of technological news make you professionally dead, but… if you only have only some minimal professional skills, you can quickly rehabilitate. Fundamental knowledge and thinking, understanding of fundamental science, fundamental working skills, analytic and synthesizing, this is what's the most important. Important is the ability to keep up, not being up at every given minute. But this ability itself is very important. There are good number of real dinosaurs, some even do good jobs, but the attitude to remain a dinosaur leads to becoming good for nothing. But the permanent chase for technologically fashionable, "cool" things, too.

—SA


这篇关于是否有可能像编程一样自学网络?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆